SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Varadarajulu S, Fockens P, Hawes RH. Best practices in EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 10: 697703.
  • 2
    Klapman JB, Logroño R, Dye CE et al. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003; 98: 12891294.
    Direct Link:
  • 3
    Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 17051710.
  • 4
    Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, Sandha GS. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 23: 2630.
  • 5
    Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Jhala N et al. Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: Implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 101: 28412847.
    Direct Link:
  • 6
    Yang YJ, Damron TA. Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2004; 128: 759764.
  • 7
    Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N et al. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 397401.
  • 8
    Levy MJ, Reddy RP, Wiersema MJ et al. EUS-guided trucut biopsy in establishing autoimmune pancreatitis as the cause of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 61: 467472.
  • 9
    Bloomston M, Durkin A, Yang I et al. Identification of molecular markers specific for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by genetic profiling of core biopsies. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2004; 11: 413419.
  • 10
    Fan YS. Companion diagnostic testing for targeted cancer therapies: An overview. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers. 2013; 17: 515523.
  • 11
    Yun SS, Remotti H, Vazquez MF et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies of pancreatic masses. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2007; 35: 276282.
  • 12
    Michael CW, Hunter B. Interpretation of fine-needle aspirates process by the ThinPrep technique: Cytologic artifacts and diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2000; 23: 613.
  • 13
    Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 62: 728736.
  • 14
    Chen VK, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is superior to lymph node echofeatures: A prospective evaluation of mediastinal and peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 628633.
  • 15
    Bueno Angela SP, Viero RM, Soares CT. Fine needle aspirate cell blocks are reliable for detection of hormone receptors and HER-2 by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma. Cytopathology 2013; 24: 2632.
  • 16
    Tournoy KG, Carprieaux M, Deschepper E et al. Are EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA specimens reliable for subtyping non-small cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer 2012; 76: 4650.
  • 17
    Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 76: 336343.
  • 18
    Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: Results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 73: 11891196.
  • 19
    Ramesh J, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S et al. Multi-center randomized trial comparing the 19G and 25G needles for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 1022 (Abstract supplement).
  • 20
    Suzuki R, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS et al. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist. Dig. Endosc. 2012; 24: 452456.
  • 21
    Wani S, Mullady D, Early DS et al. Clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology (CyP) evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic mass: Interim analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 2 (Abstract supplement).
  • 22
    Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Yoshida M et al. Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013; 28: 656663.
  • 23
    Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Azzolini F et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 709715.
  • 24
    Fabbri C, Polifemo AM, Luigiano C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: A prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence. Dig. Liver Dis. 2011; 43: 647652.
  • 25
    Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 70: 10931097.
  • 26
    Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 17391745.
  • 27
    Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi A et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 8692.
  • 28
    Levy MJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of the pancreas: Prospects and problems. Pancreatology 2007; 7: 163166.
  • 29
    Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN et al. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: A prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 59: 185190.
  • 30
    Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley W-J et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg. Endosc. 2013; 27: 29572959.
  • 31
    Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JB et al. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 909915.
  • 32
    Larghi A, Verna EC, Ricci R et al. EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using a 19-gauge needle in a selected patient population: A prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 74: 504510.
  • 33
    Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S et al. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A prospective evaluation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006; 63: 622629.
  • 34
    Varadarajulu S, Ginnetti L, Peetermans J et al. Meta-analysis comparing rates of complications between the standard 19G and 22G/25G needles for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 405 (Abstract supplement).
  • 35
    Bang JY, Ramesh J, Trevino JM et al. Objective assessment of an algorithmic approach to EUS-guided FNA and interventions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 739744.
  • 36
    Ekberg O, Bergenfeldt M, Aspelin P et al. Reliability of ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of pancreatic masses. Acta Radiol. 1988; 29: 535539.
  • 37
    Wyse JM, Paquin SC, Joseph L, Sahai A. EUS-FNA without the stylet: The yield is comparable to that with the stylet and sampling of multiple sites during the same pass may improve sample quality and yield. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 69: AB330 (Abstract).
  • 38
    Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Ramesh J et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 445450.
  • 39
    Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Durkalski V et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 54: 441447.
  • 40
    Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eltoum IA et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: A powerful tool to obtain samples from small lesions. Cancer 2004; 102: 239246.
  • 41
    Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Duralski V et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 54: 441447.
  • 42
    Puri R, Vilmann P, Săftoiu A et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 44: 499504.
  • 43
    Sahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariépy G. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 900903.
  • 44
    Rastogi A, Wani S, Gupta N et al. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 74: 5864.
  • 45
    Wani S, Gupta N, Gaddam S et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011; 56: 24092414.
  • 46
    Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH et al. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 745751.
  • 47
    Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO et al., American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 54: 811814.
  • 48
    Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 59: 3337.
  • 49
    Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 61: 700708.
  • 50
    Jacobson BC, Adler DG, Davila RE et al. ASGE guideline: Complications of EUS. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 61: 812.
  • 51
    Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A prospective evaluation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 60: 631635.
  • 52
    Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T, Gan SI et al. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 70: 10601070.