SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • cell cycle;
  • central nervous system;
  • neuronal differentiation;
  • Rb;
  • retinoblastoma

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

Once neurons enter the post-mitotic G0 phase during central nervous system (CNS) development, they lose their proliferative potential. When neurons re-enter the cell cycle during pathological situations such as neurodegeneration, they undergo cell death after S phase progression. Thus, the regulatory networks that drive cell proliferation and maintain neuronal differentiation are highly coordinated. In this review, the coordination of cell cycle control and neuronal differentiation during development are discussed, focusing on regulation by the Rb family of tumor suppressors (including p107 and p130), and the Cip/Kip family of cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors. Based on recent findings suggesting roles for these families in regulating neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation, I propose that the Rb family is essential for daughter cells of neuronal progenitors to enter the post-mitotic G0 phase without affecting the initiation of neuronal differentiation in most cases, while the Cip/Kip family regulates the timing of neuronal progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation at least in the progenitor cells of the cerebral cortex and the retina. Rb's lack of involvement in regulating the initiation of neuronal differentiation may explain why Rb family-deficient retinoblastomas characteristically exhibit neuronal features.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

One of the most striking properties of the central nervous system (CNS) is the tremendous diversity of neurons, which display distinct morphologies (Cajal 1909–1911) and gene expression profiles (Gong et al. 2003; Lein et al. 2007). These diverse populations of neurons are generated from a pool of undifferentiated multi-potent progenitor cells during a specific developmental stage in embryogenesis (Turner & Cepko 1987; Holt et al. 1988). During CNS development, different types of neurons in each part of the CNS are generated at specific times. For example, in the cerebral cortex, deep layer neurons that extend axons to subcortical targets are generated at early stages, while more superficial layer neurons that extend axons intracortically are generated at later developmental stages (Angevine & Sidman 1961). Thus, the cell cycle exit of progenitor cells must be temporally coordinated with the initiation of neuronal differentiation to control the number and ratio of different neuronal subtypes in the CNS. Once progenitor cells exit the cell cycle, their daughter neurons enter the post-mitotic G0 phase for terminal differentiation and lose their proliferative potential. This inability of differentiated neurons to undergo proliferation is one of the major reasons brain tissue cannot regenerate following injury. When mature neurons re-enter the S phase in pathological situations such as neurodegeneration, they undergo cell death (Herrup & Yang 2007). Thus, the regulatory networks that drive cell proliferation and maintain neuronal differentiation are tightly controlled.

Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in cell cycle regulation and neuronal differentiation has markedly increased in recent years. For example, the Cip/Kip family of cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors was shown to regulate the timing of neuronal progenitor cell cycle exit, thereby contributing to the generation of different neuronal subtypes in the correct ratios (Dehay & Kennedy 2007). On the other hand, the tumor suppressor Rb and its family members (p107 and p130) were found to play a central role in cell cycle regulation during cell differentiation (Burkhart & Sage 2008). Both the Cip/Kip and Rb families regulate neuronal migration, a critical aspect of neuronal differentiation (Frank & Tsai 2009). However, the coordinated regulation of the cell cycle and neuronal differentiation, and the consequences of uncoupled proliferation and differentiation during neuronal development are not well understood. Here, recent reports describing the mechanisms by which cells enter the quiescent, senescent, and post-mitotic G0 phases, the coordination of cell cycle control and neuronal differentiation during development, and the consequences of uncoupled proliferation and differentiation leading to the development of retinoblastoma are reviewed. Based on these findings, I propose that the Rb family is essential for regulating the entrance and maintenance of the daughter neurons of progenitors in the post-mitotic G0 phase, without affecting the initiation of neuronal differentiation in most cases, while the Cip/Kip family controls the timing of progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation at least in the progenitor cells of the cerebral cortex and the retina.

Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

RB1 was the first tumor suppressor gene cloned from patients with retinoblastoma (Friend et al. 1986). The Rb protein product suppresses the expression of genes important for S phase progression by binding to the E2F transcription factor (Chellappan et al. 1991; Hiebert et al. 1992; Weintraub et al. 1992). During the G1 to S phase progression, Rb is phosphorylated and dissociates from E2F, which induces the expression of S phase-related genes (Buchkovich et al. 1989; Chen et al. 1989; DeCaprio et al. 1989). The Rb family members p107 and p130 also bind to E2F and function to control proliferation. p107 and p130 are expressed during different cell cycle phases, while Rb is expressed throughout the cell cycle. p107 is found in an E2F complex at the late G1 and S phases (Devoto et al. 1992; Shirodkar et al. 1992), while p130 and E2F form a complex during the quiescent G0 and early G1 phases (Cobrinik et al. 1993; Smith et al. 1996).

Serum-starved cells enter the quiescent G0 phase prior to the late G1 restriction point (Pardee 1974; Fig. 1A). When quiescent G0 cells receive growth stimulation, a few hours later they re-enter the late G1 phase and proliferate (Zetterberg & Larsson 1985; Fig. 1A). p130 functions to maintain the quiescent G0 phase by an epigenetic mechanism involving the recruitment of chromatin-modifying enzymes that suppress E2F-target genes (Takahashi et al. 2000; Rayman et al. 2002). When cells arrest at the quiescent G0 phase, p130 forms a complex with E2F4 and the histone deacetylase HDAC1, associated with the low levels of histone H3 and H4 acetylation (Fig. 1B). When cells advance to the late G1 phase, the p130-E2F4-HDAC1 complex is replaced by E2F1 and E2F3, associated with the high levels of histone acetylation. Thus, Rb family members suppress E2F-dependent transcription in both phosphorylation- and chromatin modification-dependent manners (Fig. 2A). Rb also suppresses cell cycle progression in E2F-independent manners, involving Cdk inhibition (Fig. 2B). In one mechanism, Rb binds to S-phase kinase-associated protein (Skp2), the F-box protein of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex (Ji et al. 2004). This interaction prevents the degradation of p27, a Cip/Kip family member, via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In a second mechanism, Rb interacts with both Skp2 and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C; Binne et al. 2007). This interaction leads to Skp2 ubiquitylation and degradation, thereby stabilizing p27.

image

Figure 1. Rb family regulation of cell entrance and maintenance in the G0 phase. (A) After cells exit the cell cycle, they enter the G0 phase. The quiescent G0 phase is reversible, allowing cells to re-enter the cell cycle following growth factor stimulation, while both the senescent G0 phase and the post-mitotic G0 phase, leading to terminal differentiation, are irreversible. (B) Epigenetic landmarks of the quiescent, senescent, and post-mitotic G0 phases. The Rb family is required for cells to enter the different G0 phases and is thought to mediate the epigenetic modifications characteristic of each phase using different molecular mechanisms. (C) The Rb family is essential for maintaining the senescent and the post-mitotic G0 phases. The inactivation of Rb in senescent mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) induces cell proliferation while Rb family inactivation in post-mitotic cortical neurons induces cell death after S phase progression.

Download figure to PowerPoint

image

Figure 2. Rb family-mediated E2F-dependent and -independent mechanisms regulate S phase progression. (A) Rb family-mediated E2F-dependent mechanisms regulate S phase progression. Both phosphorylation-dependent and chromatin-dependent mechanisms involving Rb and E2F function to suppress gene expressions required for S phase progression. (B) Alternative E2F-independent/Cdk-dependent mechanisms involving Rb regulate S phase progression. In one mechanism, Rb binds to Skp2 and prevents p27 degradation. In another mechanism, Rb binds to both anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and Skp2 and induces Skp2 degradation, thereby stabilizing p27.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Although the Rb family members use different mechanisms to prevent S phase progression, redundancy among these family members is likely to mask their individual functions. Therefore, Rb−/−; p107−/−; p130−/− (Rb-TKO) cells are ideal for elucidating Rb family functions in suppressing S phase progression. The mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from Rb-TKO embryonic stem (ES) cells are resistant to G1 arrest triggers such as contact inhibition and serum starvation (Dannenberg et al. 2000; Sage et al. 2000). Thus, use of the triple knockout showed that the Rb family is essential for inducing cultured MEFs to enter the quiescent G0 phase.

Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

The quiescent G0 phase is different from the senescent and post-mitotic G0 phases with respect to the terminal differentiation of cells and their responses to growth factor stimulation. In contrast to quiescent G0 phase cells, senescent and post-mitotic G0 phase cells are incapable of proliferating after growth factor stimulation (Fig. 1A). Senescent cells can be distinguished from post-mitotic cells by the expression of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-βgal; Dimri et al. 1995) and the presence of senescence-associated DNA-damage foci (SDFs; d'Adda di Fagagna et al. 2003; Takai et al. 2003) and senescence-associated heterochromatic foci (SAHFs; Narita et al. 2003). SAHFs are characterized by the presence of heterochromatin-associated histone modifications such as tri-methylated lysine 9 at histone H3 (H3K9Me3) and the methyl-lysine binding protein HP1 (Fig. 1B). Consistent with biochemical data showing that Rb associates with Suv39h1, the H3K9 histone methylase, and HP1 (Nielsen et al. 2001), the loss of Rb prevents SAHF formation and inhibits cells from entering the senescent G0 phase (Chicas et al. 2010). In contrast to quiescent cells, senescent cells are characterized by the association of Rb, rather than p107 or p130, with the E2F-target genes important for S phase progression. Moreover, the inactivation of Rb in senescent MEFs causes them to re-enter the cell cycle and proliferate (Sage et al. 2003). Thus, among the Rb family members, Rb is uniquely required for cells to enter and remain in the senescent G0 phase.

The role of Rb family members in regulating the entrance and maintenance of cells in the post-mitotic G0 phase, leading to terminal differentiation is context-dependent (Burkhart & Sage 2008; Indovina et al. 2013). During skeletal muscle differentiation, the loss of Rb in undifferentiated cells leads to S phase progression both in vitro and in vivo but does not affect the initiation of differentiation, suggesting that Rb is required for cells to enter the post-mitotic G0 phase (Gu et al. 1993; Schneider et al. 1994; Novitch et al. 1996; Zacksenhaus et al. 1996). However, Rb-deficient myotubes fail to fully mature. Rb interacts with the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) muscle transcription factor MyoD and may control terminal differentiation via this factor (Gu et al. 1993), suggesting that Rb regulates the entrance of cells into the post-mitotic G0 phase as well as their advancing differentiation. In contrast, the inactivation of Rb in post-mitotic myocytes and myotubes does not lead to S phase progression (Camarda et al. 2004; Pajcini et al. 2010). Additional signals such as Cyclin D and Cdk4 overexpression and Arf suppression are required for the S phase progression of Rb-deficient post-mitotic myocytes and myotubes. Although the roles of p107 and p130 in maintaining the post-mitotic state of skeletal muscle myotubes have not yet been characterized, the inactivation of both Rb and p130 leads post-mitotic cardiac myocytes to enter the S phase (Sdek et al. 2011), suggesting that the Rb family is required for maintaining cardiac myocytes and possibly other cell types in the post-mitotic G0 phase.

Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

Unlike myocyte differentiation, the timing of progenitor cell cycle exit affects the total neuron number, because neurogenesis is limited to a specific developmental stage. If more progenitor cells exit the cell cycle at early developmental stages, fewer progenitor cells are produced, and therefore fewer neurons are generated in total. In contrast, if fewer progenitor cells exit the cell cycle at the early stages, more progenitor cells are produced and therefore more neurons are generated in total. Since glial cells proliferate even after development (Ge et al. 2012), the number of progenitor cells to produce glial cells at the later gliogenic stages may not affect the total number of glial cells. In fact, neurogenesis peaks later in the development of the larger primate cerebral cortex than in that of a smaller rodent (Finlay et al. 1998). The timing of progenitor cell cycle exit also affects the ratio of specific neuronal subtypes, because of the birth-date-dependent neurogenesis of each subtype. In the retina, cone genesis peaks earlier than rod genesis (Young 1985). As cone and rod photoreceptors are responsible for color and night vision, respectively, it was hypothesized that among closely related species, more retinal progenitor cells exit the cell cycle at the early stages in diurnal species than in nocturnal ones. In fact, the retinal progenitor cells in the diurnal capuchin monkey exit the cell cycle earlier and produce more early-born cone and ganglion cells than do those in the nocturnal owl monkey (Dyer et al. 2009). Thus, the timing of progenitor cell exit from the cell cycle and initiation of differentiation impacts the total neuron number and the ratio of neuronal subtypes. Deregulated timing may alter neuronal numbers and neuron subtype ratios, which may affect neuronal functions. Thus, genetic alterations that result in timing differences may contribute to evolution at the species level and may cause neuronal defects at the individual organism level.

The timing of progenitor cell cycle exit and neuronal differentiation initiation is regulated by the Cip/Kip family. Although the Cip/Kip family member p21 directly regulates cell cycle exit during skeletal muscle differentiation (Guo et al. 1995; Halevy et al. 1995; Parker et al. 1995; Skapek et al. 1995; Zhang et al. 1999), in the CNS, p21 indirectly regulates the cell cycle exit of adult neural stem cells by negatively regulating the pluripotency factor, Sox2 (Kippin et al. 2005; Marques-Torrejon et al. 2013). In contrast, the other Cip/Kip family members, p27 and p57, regulate the cell cycle exit of cortical progenitor cells (Goto et al. 2004; Tarui et al. 2005; Tury et al. 2011; Mairet-Coello et al. 2012). In primates, more upper layer neurons (late-born neurons) are generated in the primary than in the secondary visual cortex (Rockel et al. 1980), and a recent report indicates that the Cip/Kip family contributes to these differences (Lukaszewicz et al. 2005). The G1 phase is shorter, p27 expression is lower, and Cyclin E expression is higher in the progenitors of the primary visual cortex at the developmental stages when the upper layer progenitors expand to generate a sufficient number of upper layer neurons. p27 also contributes to neuronal differentiation not only by suppressing Cdk activity but also by regulating RhoA-mediated neuronal migration (Kawauchi et al. 2006; Nguyen et al. 2006). p57 also regulates both cell cycle arrest and neuronal migration (Itoh et al. 2007; Tury et al. 2011; Mairet-Coello et al. 2012). Thus, the Cip/Kip family coordinates the timing of progenitor cell cycle exit, the initiation of neuronal differentiation, and neuronal migration by multiple signaling pathways. Although recent studies have revealed that the p21-Cdk and p21-Sox2 pathways coordinate cell cycle exit and the initiation of differentiation in adult neural stem cells, future studies are required to elucidate the molecular mechanism(s) by which the Cip/Kip family coordinates these activities in cortical progenitors.

Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

In contrast to the Cip/Kip family, the Rb family does not regulate the initiation of differentiation in most cases. For example, when Rb is inactivated in mouse otocysts, the progenitors of hair and supporting cells in the utricle, Rb-deficient hair cells are terminally differentiated but continue to proliferate (Sage et al. 2005). Terminally differentiated neurons can also proliferate when the Rb family is inactivated in retinal progenitor cells. Retinal horizontal interneurons generated from Rb−/−; p107+/−; p130−/− (p107-single) mouse retinal progenitor cells re-enter the cell cycle, proliferate, and form retinoblastomas, while maintaining their differentiated state, including the ability to form neurites and synaptic connections (Ajioka et al. 2007). In contrast, p27-deficient retinal progenitor cells extend their retinogenesis stages (Levine et al. 2000). Importantly, the G2/M-phase marker phosphohistone-H3-positive neurons in the retina and the brain are detected when both p27 and the Ink4 family Cdk inhibitor p19 are deleted (Cunningham et al. 2002; Zindy et al. 1999). Since the Ink4 but not the Cip/Kip family suppresses the activity of Cdk4 (Sherr & Roberts 1999), which uniquely phosphorylates Rb at Ser780 (Kitagawa et al. 1996), Ink4-CyclinD/Cdk4-Rb axis may be partly involved in suppressing uncoupled differentiation and proliferation. Thus, some Rb family-deficient cells continue to proliferate while undergoing differentiation, two processes that are usually mutually exclusive.

Rb also regulates neuronal differentiation and maturation in a context-dependent manner. For example, Rb, but not p107 or p130, regulates the differentiation and maturation of rod photoreceptor and starburst amacrine cells in the mouse retina (Zhang et al. 2004a; Johnson et al. 2006; Chen et al. 2007; Table 1). The differentiation and maturation defects in Rb-deficient retina are not due to the deregulation of the timing of the cell cycle exit of retinal progenitor cells. In the mouse retina, one allele each of Rb and p107 is sufficient to regulate the proper cell cycle progression of retinal progenitor cells (Donovan et al. 2006). However, Rb−/−; p107−/− retinal progenitor cells do not exit the cell cycle, but initiate differentiation into the various types of retinal neurons (Chen et al. 2004; Macpherson et al. 2004). As a consequence, differentiating rod and cone photoreceptors, ganglion cells, and bipolar cells undergo cell death, while differentiating amacrine, horizontal, and Müller glia cells proliferate and form retinoblastomas (Table 1). Most of the cell cycle defects are rescued by the additional inactivation of E2f1 (Chen et al. 2007; Table 1). However, the differentiation defect of starburst amacrine cells is not rescued in the Rb−/−; E2f1−/− retina, but is rescued in the Rb−/−; E2f3a−/− retina, suggesting that Rb regulates starburst amacrine cell differentiation in a cell cycle-independent manner (Table 1). The defect of starburst amacrine cell differentiation may not be due to that of the initiation of differentiation because the ratio of starburst amacrine cell marker-positive cells in Rb-deficient retina decreases as development progresses.

Table 1. Summary of Rb family-mutant mouse strains
GenotypeCre activityPhenotypeReference
  1. a

    The retinal cells of Pax6-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox mice deregulate their cell cycle even in the presence of p107 but not develop retinoblastoma.

Col1A1-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox Utriclar cells (progenitors)Hair cell proliferationSage et al. (2005)
Chx10-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox Retinal progenitorsImmature rod photoreceptorsZhang et al. (2004a); Johnson et al. (2006)
Pax6-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; p107−/− Retinal progenitors (peripheral)Immature amacrine/horizontal/Müller glia cell proliferation (tumor)Chen et al. (2004)
Nestin-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; p107−/− Progenitors in the CNSImmature amacrine/horizontal/Müller glia cell proliferation (tumor)Macpherson et al. (2004)
Nestin-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; p130−/− Progenitors in the CNSImmature amacrine/horizontal/Müller glia cell proliferation (tumor)Macpherson et al. (2004)
Chx10-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; p107−/− Retinal progenitorsImmature amacrine/horizontal/Müller glia cell proliferation (tumor) Zhang et al. (2004b)
Chx10-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; p107+/−; p130−/− (p107-single)Retinal progenitorsDifferentiated horizontal cell proliferation (tumor)Ajioka et al. (2007)
Chx10-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; p107−/−; p130 Lox/Lox (Rb-TKO)Retinal progenitorsTumor (no description of early stages)McEvoy et al. (2011)
Pax6-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox Retinal progenitors (peripheral)Deregulated cell cyclea and the defect of starburst amacrine cellsChen et al. (2007)
Pax6-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; E2f1−/− Retinal progenitors (peripheral)The defect of starburst amacrine cellsChen et al. (2007)
Pax6-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; E2f3a−/− Retinal progenitors (peripheral)Deregulated cell cycleaChen et al. (2007)
Foxg1-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox Cortical progenitorsMigration defect of cortical interneuronsFerguson et al. (2005)
Foxg1-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; E2f1−/− Cortical progenitorsMigration defect of cortical interneuronsMcClellan et al. (2007)
Foxg1-Cre; Rb Lox/Lox; E2f3−/− Cortical progenitorsRescued migration defectMcClellan et al. (2007)
CamKCreERT2; Rb Lox/Lox NeuronsCell deathAndrusiak et al. (2012)
Rb Lox/Lox; p107−/−; p130 Lox/Lox (Rb-TKO), pCAG-Cre electroporationCortical progenitorsImmature neuron proliferationOshikawa et al. (2013)
Rb Lox/Lox; p107−/−; p130 Lox/Lox (Rb-TKO), pMAP2-Cre electroporationImmature cortical neuronsS phase progression but not G2/M phase progressionOshikawa et al. (2013)
p27 CK−/CK−  Retinal progenitor amplification (tumor)Besson et al. (2007)

Rb also regulates neuronal migration in a cell cycle-independent manner. Differentiating cortical inhibitory neurons generated at the ganglionic eminence migrate tangentially to the cerebral cortex, and Rb-E2F3, but not Rb-E2F1, regulates this migration (Ferguson et al. 2005; McClellan et al. 2007; Table 1). E2F3 binds to the promoter region of the netrin receptor neogenin to activate its expression, while the binding of Rb suppresses neogenin gene expression. Since neogenin overexpression suppresses cell migration from the medial ganglionic eminence, the Rb-E2F3-neogenin pathway is important for regulating the migration of cortical inhibitory neurons (Andrusiak et al. 2011). Recent reports revealed that the Rb family also plays a role in regulating the migration of cortical excitatory neurons (Oshikawa et al. 2013; Svoboda et al. 2013). Although the molecular mechanisms of this regulation have not yet been identified, they are likely to differ from those underlying the regulation of inhibitory neurons, because (i) Rb inactivation alone inhibits the migration of inhibitory neurons while the additional inactivation of p107 and p130 is required to inhibit the migration of excitatory neurons and (ii) neogenin is not upregulated in the absence of Rb family members in excitatory neurons as it is in inhibitory neurons. Thus, the Rb family is essential for promoting cell entry into the post-mitotic G0 phase in general, and regulates neuronal differentiation in a context-specific manner.

Rb family members were also recently shown to be involved in the maintenance of post-mitotic neurons. We recently developed a technique for the conditional inactivation of all Rb family members just after cells enter the post-mitotic G0 phase, by the ex vivo electroporation of a Cre-expressing plasmid with a neuron-specific pMAP2 promoter (Oshikawa et al. 2013; Table 1). When the Rb family is inactivated following cell entry into the post-mitotic G0 phase, differentiating neurons undergo S phase progression, but not cell division. In contrast, Rb family inactivation in cortical progenitor cells leads to differentiating neurons that divide and proliferate. Thus, once differentiating cortical excitatory neurons enter the post-mitotic G0 phase, they are prevented from undergoing cell division even after the inactivation of all Rb family members.

Epigenetic regulation appears to be involved in maintaining cells in the post-mitotic G0 phase. During the neurogenesis of cortical excitatory neurons, H4K20 becomes tri-methylated (Fig. 1B). In mouse MEFs, the Rb family is required for H4K20 tri-methylation (Gonzalo et al. 2005). Rb family members bind to the histone methyl transferases Suv420h1 and Suv420h2, resulting in the transition of mono- to tri-methylated H4K20. Consistent with these findings, H4K20 is not tri-methylated in post-mitotic neurons generated from Rb-TKO progenitor cells, while the tri-methylated status of H4K20 is maintained in post-mitotic neurons in which Rb family members have been conditionally inactivated. Future studies are required to elucidate the biological roles of H4K20 tri-methylation in post-mitotic differentiating neurons.

In mature neurons in the CNS, the Rb pathway is believed to prevent cell cycle re-entry, which can result in cell death associated with the progression of neuronal degeneration (Heintz 1993; Herrup & Yang 2007). In fact, when Rb is inactivated in mature cortical neurons using the CamKCreERT2 transgenic mouse, Rb-deficient mature neurons undergo cell death (Andrusiak et al. 2012; Table 1). Although this study did not address whether Rb-deficient mature neurons undergo S phase progression or whether the redundancy of p107 and p130 compensates for Rb to prevent S phase progression, Rb family inactivation (using the MAP2 promoter system) induced cell death after S phase progression (IA; unpubl. data). Thus, Rb family-deficient progenitors initiate neuronal differentiation without exiting the cell cycle, resulting in proliferation, while the acute inactivation of Rb family in post-mitotic neurons leads to cell death. In contrast to senescent cells, post-mitotic neurons, at least cortical excitatory neurons, do not proliferate after S phase progression, even after Rb family inactivation.

Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

Recent advances in whole genome sequencing have revealed that RB1 is the only known tumor suppressor gene that is mutated in human retinoblastoma (Zhang et al. 2012). The p53 pathway is another tumor suppressor pathway that impacts retinoblastoma development. RB1 inactivation upregulates MDMX, the E3 ubiquitin ligase that recognizes and degrades p53, resulting in p53 pathway inactivation in the RB1-deficient human retina (Laurie et al. 2006). In contrast to the human retina, in the mouse Rb-deficient retina, p107 is upregulated and compensates for Rb functions in cell cycle regulation (Donovan et al. 2006). The mouse Rb−/−; p107−/−, Rb−/−; p130−/−, p107-single, and Rb-TKO retinae develop retinoblastoma (Chen et al. 2004; Macpherson et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2004b; Ajioka et al. 2007; McEvoy et al. 2011; Table 1). In p107-single mice, differentiated horizontal interneurons proliferate and develop retinoblastomas (Ajioka et al. 2007). At the later stages of tumor development, p107-single retinoblastomas lose their differentiated properties and form metastatic retinoblastomas. In contrast, the retinoblastomas from Rb−/−; p107−/− mice exhibit immature neuron-like features even at the early developmental stages (Chen et al. 2004; Macpherson et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2004b). Importantly, the knock-in mice expressing mutant p27 protein that cannot bind to Cyclins and Cdks (p27 CK− mice) develop retinoblastoma associated with the amplification of retinal progenitor cells (Besson et al. 2007; Table 1).

Interestingly, both mouse and human late-stage retinoblastomas deficient in the Rb family and RB1, respectively, co-express the cell-type-specific genes for amacrine and horizontal interneurons, rod and cone photoreceptors, and retinal progenitor cells, which are usually mutually exclusive (McEvoy et al. 2011; Fig. 3). A subsequent analysis of epigenetically deregulated genes in retinoblastoma identified many of the same pathways that are co-expressed in these hybrid tumor cells. These data suggest that RB1 inactivation can lead to epigenetic changes in key cancer and retinal differentiation pathways and contribute to the expression of this hybrid developmental phenotype in retinoblastoma.

image

Figure 3. Epigenetic landmarks of retinoblastoma. In human retinoblastoma, the promoter region of SYK is epigenetically deregulated and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), a cell-survival factor for retinoblastoma tumor cells, is upregulated. H3K9 and H3K14 are acetylated and H3K4 is tri-methylated, a characteristic landmark of elevated transcriptional activation. Both human and mouse retinoblastomas co-express cell-type-specific genes for rod and cone photoreceptors, horizontal and amacrine interneurons, and retinal progenitor cells. Expression of these cell-type-specific genes is usually limited to their respective neuronal subtypes.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The proto-oncogene, spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), is highly expressed in retinoblastoma and is required for cell survival in this tumor (Zhang et al. 2012). The SYK promoter region exhibits transcriptional activation landmarks such as H3K4Me3 and acetylated H3K9 and H3K14 (Fig. 3), suggesting that epigenetic changes in RB1-deficient human retinoblastoma are important for tumor development. On the other hand, another report indicates that human retinoblastomas exhibit characteristic features of differentiating cone photoreceptor cells (Xu et al. 2009). MDM2, another p53 E3 ubiquitin ligase, is upregulated by the cone-specific transcription factor RXRγ in humans. A recent gene expression analysis revealed that human retinoblastomas are composed of two subgroups (Kapatai et al. 2013): group 1 tumors express genes associated with multiple retinal cell types and group 2 tumors express genes associated with differentiating cone cells. Future studies are required to understand the mechanisms by which these two retinoblastoma subtypes develop after RB1 loss. Rb-dependent epigenetic changes that induce uncoupled proliferation and differentiation along with p53 pathway inactivation may play an important role in retinoblastoma development.

Conclusions and perspectives

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References

Recent studies have demonstrated that the Rb family regulates the entrance and maintenance of cells in the post-mitotic G0 phase during neuronal development. Importantly, once neurons enter the post-mitotic phase, cell cycle regulators ensure that proliferation and differentiation are mutually exclusive paths, and prevent cell division even after Rb family inactivation. In contrast, Rb family-deficient neuronal progenitor cells initiate differentiation without exiting the cell cycle at least in the progenitor cells of the cerebral cortex and the retina (Fig. 4), resulting in tumor formation in the retina. On the other hand, Cip/Kip family-deficient neuronal progenitor cells tend to proliferate and suppress the initiation of differentiation, resulting in increased or decreased total cell numbers and altered ratios of neuronal subtypes at least in the progenitor cells of the cerebral cortex and the retina (Fig. 4). Future studies are required to understand the mechanism by which post-mitotic neurons are prevented from undergoing cell division. The elucidation of these mechanisms may lead to the development of new regenerative strategies for recovering lost neurons in neurodegenerative diseases.

image

Figure 4. Coordination of progenitor proliferation and neuronal differentiation by the Cip/Kip and Rb families. (A) During neurogenesis, cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation are well coordinated in progenitor cells. (B) Rb family-deficient progenitor cells initiate neuronal differentiation without exiting the cell cycle, resulting in uncoupled proliferation and differentiation. (C, D) Cip/Kip family-overexpressing and -deficient progenitor cells tend to exit the cell cycle earlier and later, respectively.

Download figure to PowerPoint

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the quiescent G0 phase
  5. Role of the Rb family in regulating cell entrance into the senescent or post-mitotic G0 phase
  6. Cip/Kip family regulation of neural progenitor cell cycle exit and the initiation of neuronal differentiation
  7. Rb family proteins regulate progenitor cell cycle exit without affecting neuronal differentiation initiation
  8. Uncoupled proliferation and neuronal differentiation in retinoblastoma formation
  9. Conclusions and perspectives
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  • Ajioka, I., Martins, R. A., Bayazitov, I. T., Donovan, S., Johnson, D. A., Frase, S., Cicero, S. A., Boyd, K., Zakharenko, S. S. & Dyer, M. A. 2007. Differentiated horizontal interneurons clonally expand to form metastatic retinoblastoma in mice. Cell 131, 378390.
  • Andrusiak, M. G., McClellan, K. A., Dugal-Tessier, D., Julian, L. M., Rodrigues, S. P., Park, D. S., Kennedy, T. E. & Slack, R. S. 2011. Rb/E2F regulates expression of neogenin during neuronal migration. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 238247.
  • Andrusiak, M. G., Vandenbosch, R., Park, D. S. & Slack, R. S. 2012. The retinoblastoma protein is essential for survival of postmitotic neurons. J. Neurosci. 32, 1480914814.
  • Angevine, J. B. Jr & Sidman, R. L. 1961. Autoradiographic study of cell migration during histogenesis of cerebral cortex in the mouse. Nature 192, 766768.
  • Besson, A., Hwang, H. C., Cicero, S., Donovan, S.L., Gurian-West, M., Johnson, D., Clurman, B.E., Dyer, M.A. & Roberts, J.M. 2007. Discovery of an oncogenic activity in p27Kip1 that causes stem cell expansion and a multiple tumor phenotype. Genes Dev. 21, 17311746.
  • Binne, U. K., Classon, M. K., Dick, F. A., Wei, W., Rape, M., Kaelin, W. G., . Jr, Naar & A. M. Dyson, N. J. 2007. Retinoblastoma protein and anaphase-promoting complex physically interact and functionally cooperate during cell-cycle exit. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 225232.
  • Buchkovich, K., Duffy, L. A. & Harlow, E. 1989. The retinoblastoma protein is phosphorylated during specific phases of the cell cycle. Cell 58, 10971105.
  • Burkhart, D. L. & Sage, J. 2008. Cellular mechanisms of tumour suppression by the retinoblastoma gene. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 671682.
  • Cajal, R. Y. 1909–1911. Histologie dù Système Nerveux de l′homme et des vertébrés. Maloine, París.
  • Camarda, G., Siepi, F., Pajalunga, D., Bernardini, C., Rossi, R., Montecucco, A., Meccia, E. & Crescenzi, M. 2004. A pRb-independent mechanism preserves the postmitotic state in terminally differentiated skeletal muscle cells. J. Cell Biol. 167, 417423.
  • Chellappan, S. P., Hiebert, S., Mudryj, M., Horowitz, J. M. & Nevins, J. R. 1991. The E2F transcription factor is a cellular target for the RB protein. Cell 65, 10531061.
  • Chen, D., Livne-Bar, I., Vanderluit, J. L., Slack, R. S., Agochiya, M. & Bremner, R. 2004. Cell-specific effects of RB or RB/p107 loss on retinal development implicate an intrinsically death-resistant cell-of-origin in retinoblastoma. Cancer Cell 5, 539551.
  • Chen, D., Opavsky, R., Pacal, M., Tanimoto, N., Wenzel, P., Seeliger, M. W., Leone, G. & Bremner, R. 2007. Rb-mediated neuronal differentiation through cell-cycle-independent regulation of E2f3a. PLoS Biol. 5, e179.
  • Chen, P. L., Scully, P., Shew, J. Y., Wang, J. Y. & Lee, W. H. 1989. Phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product is modulated during the cell cycle and cellular differentiation. Cell 58, 11931198.
  • Chicas, A., Wang, X., Zhang, C., Mccurrach, M., Zhao, Z., Mert, O., Dickins, R. A., Narita, M., Zhang, M. & Lowe, S. W. 2010. Dissecting the unique role of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor during cellular senescence. Cancer Cell 17, 376387.
  • Cobrinik, D., Whyte, P., Peeper, D. S., Jacks, T. & Weinberg, R. A. 1993. Cell cycle-specific association of E2F with the p130 E1A-binding protein. Genes Dev. 7, 23922404.
  • Cunningham, J. J., Levine, E. M., Zindy, F., Goloubeva, O., Roussel, M. F. & Smeyne, R. J. 2002. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p19(Ink4d) and p27(Kip1) are coexpressed in select retinal cells and act cooperatively to control cell cycle exit. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 19, 359374.
  • d'Adda di Fagagna, F., Reaper, P. M., Clay-Farrace, L., Fiegler, H., Carr, P., Von Zglinicki, T., Saretzki, G., Carter, N. P. & Jackson, S. P. 2003. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 426, 194198.
  • Dannenberg, J. H., Van Rossum, A., Schuijff, L. & Te Riele, H. 2000. Ablation of the retinoblastoma gene family deregulates G(1) control causing immortalization and increased cell turnover under growth-restricting conditions. Genes Dev. 14, 30513064.
  • DeCaprio, J. A., Ludlow, J. W., Lynch, D., Furukawa, Y., Griffin, J., Piwnica-Worms, H., Huang, C. M. & Livingston, D. M. 1989. The product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene has properties of a cell cycle regulatory element. Cell 58, 10851095.
  • Dehay, C. & Kennedy, H. 2007. Cell-cycle control and cortical development. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 438450.
  • Devoto, S. H., Mudryj, M., Pines, J., Hunter, T. & Nevins, J. R. 1992. A cyclin A-protein kinase complex possesses sequence-specific DNA binding activity: p33cdk2 is a component of the E2F-cyclin A complex. Cell 68, 167176.
  • Dimri, G. P., Lee, X., Basile, G., Acosta, M., Scott, G., Roskelley, C., Medrano, E. E., Linskens, M., Rubelj, I. & Pereira-Smith, O. 1995. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 93639367.
  • Donovan, S. L., Schweers, B., Martins, R., Johnson, D. & Dyer, M. A. 2006. Compensation by tumor suppressor genes during retinal development in mice and humans. BMC Biol. 4, 14.
  • Dyer, M. A., Martins, R., Da Silva Filho, M., Muniz, J. A., Silveira, L. C., Cepko, C. L. & Finlay, B. L. 2009. Developmental sources of conservation and variation in the evolution of the primate eye. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 89638968.
  • Ferguson, K. L., McClellan, K. A., Vanderluit, J. L., Mcintosh, W. C., Schuurmans, C., Polleux, F. & Slack, R. S. 2005. A cell-autonomous requirement for the cell cycle regulatory protein, Rb, in neuronal migration. EMBO J. 24, 43814391.
  • Finlay, B. L., Hersman, M. N. & Darlington, R. B. 1998. Patterns of vertebrate neurogenesis and the paths of vertebrate evolution. Brain Behav. Evol. 52, 232242.
  • Frank, C. L. & Tsai, L. H. 2009. Alternative functions of core cell cycle regulators in neuronal migration, neuronal maturation, and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 62, 312326.
  • Friend, S. H., Bernards, R., Rogelj, S., Weinberg, R. A., Rapaport, J. M., Albert, D. M. & Dryja, T. P. 1986. A human DNA segment with properties of the gene that predisposes to retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma. Nature 323, 643646.
  • Ge, W. P., Miyawaki, A., Gage, F. H., Jan, Y. N. & Jan, L. Y. 2012. Local generation of glia is a major astrocyte source in postnatal cortex. Nature 484, 376380.
  • Gong, S., Zheng, C., Doughty, M. L., Losos, K., Didkovsky, N., Schambra, U. B., Nowak, N. J., Joyner, A., Leblanc, G., Hatten, M. E. & Heintz, N. 2003. A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes. Nature 425, 917925.
  • Gonzalo, S., Garcia-Cao, M., Fraga, M. F., Schotta, G., Peters, A. H., Cotter, S. E., Eguia, R., Dean, D. C., Esteller, M., Jenuwein, T. & Blasco, M. A. 2005. Role of the RB1 family in stabilizing histone methylation at constitutive heterochromatin. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 420428.
  • Goto, T., Mitsuhashi, T. & Takahashi, T. 2004. Altered patterns of neuron production in the p27 knockout mouse. Dev. Neurosci. 26, 208217.
  • Gu, W., Schneider, J. W., Condorelli, G., Kaushal, S., Mahdavi, V. & Nadal-Ginard, B. 1993. Interaction of myogenic factors and the retinoblastoma protein mediates muscle cell commitment and differentiation. Cell 72, 309324.
  • Guo, K., Wang, J., Andres, V., Smith, R. C. & Walsh, K. 1995. MyoD-induced expression of p21 inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase activity upon myocyte terminal differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 38233829.
  • Halevy, O., Novitch, B. G., Spicer, D. B., Skapek, S. X., Rhee, J., Hannon, G. J., Beach, D. & Lassar, A. B. 1995. Correlation of terminal cell cycle arrest of skeletal muscle with induction of p21 by MyoD. Science 267, 10181021.
  • Heintz, N. 1993. Cell death and the cell cycle: a relationship between transformation and neurodegeneration? Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 157159.
  • Herrup, K. & Yang, Y. 2007. Cell cycle regulation in the postmitotic neuron: oxymoron or new biology? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 368378.
  • Hiebert, S. W., Chellappan, S. P., Horowitz, J. M. & Nevins, J. R. 1992. The interaction of RB with E2F coincides with an inhibition of the transcriptional activity of E2F. Genes Dev. 6, 177185.
  • Holt, C. E., Bertsch, T. W., Ellis, H. M. & Harris, W. A. 1988. Cellular determination in the Xenopus retina is independent of lineage and birth date. Neuron 1, 1526.
  • Indovina, P., Marcelli, E., Casini, N., Rizzo, V. & Giordano, A. 2013. Emerging roles of RB family: new defense mechanisms against tumor progression. J. Cell. Physiol. 228, 525535.
  • Itoh, Y., Masuyama, N., Nakayama, K., Nakayama, K. I. & Gotoh, Y. 2007. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p57 and p27 regulate neuronal migration in the developing mouse neocortex. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 390396.
  • Ji, P., Jiang, H., Rekhtman, K., Bloom, J., Ichetovkin, M., Pagano, M. & Zhu, L. 2004. An Rb-Skp2-p27 pathway mediates acute cell cycle inhibition by Rb and is retained in a partial-penetrance Rb mutant. Mol. Cell 16, 4758.
  • Johnson, D. A., Donovan, S. L. & Dyer, M. A. 2006. Mosaic deletion of Rb arrests rod differentiation and stimulates ectopic synaptogenesis in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 498, 112128.
  • Kapatai, G., Brundler, M. A., Jenkinson, H., Kearns, P., Parulekar, M., Peet, A. C. & McConville, C. M. 2013. Gene expression profiling identifies different sub-types of retinoblastoma. Br. J. Cancer 109, 512525.
  • Kawauchi, T., Chihama, K., Nabeshima, Y. & Hoshino, M. 2006. Cdk5 phosphorylates and stabilizes p27kip1 contributing to actin organization and cortical neuronal migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1726.
  • Kippin, T. E., Martens, D. J. & Van Der Kooy, D. 2005. p21 loss compromises the relative quiescence of forebrain stem cell proliferation leading to exhaustion of their proliferation capacity. Genes Dev. 19, 756767.
  • Kitagawa, M., Higashi, H., Jung, H. K., Suzuki-Takahashi, I., Ikeda, M., Tamai, K., Kato, J., Segawa, K., Yoshida, E., Nishimura, S. & Taya, Y. 1996. The consensus motif for phosphorylation by cyclin D1-Cdk4 is different from that for phosphorylation by cyclin A/E-Cdk2. EMBO J. 15, 70607069.
  • Laurie, N. A., Donovan, S. L., Shih, C. S., Zhang, J., Mills, N., Fuller, C., Teunisse, A., Lam, S., Ramos, Y., Mohan, A., Johnson, D., Wilson, M., Rodriguez-Galindo, C., Quarto, M., Francoz, S., Mendrysa, S. M., Guy, R. K., Marine, J. C., Jochemsen, A. G. & Dyer, M. A. 2006. Inactivation of the p53 pathway in retinoblastoma. Nature 444, 6166.
  • Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., Chen, L., Chen, T. M., Chin, M. C., Chong, J., Crook, B. E., Czaplinska, A., Dang, C. N., Datta, S., Dee, N. R., Desaki, A. L., Desta, T., Diep, E., Dolbeare, T. A., Donelan, M. J., Dong, H. W., Dougherty, J. G., Duncan, B. J., Ebbert, A. J., Eichele, G., Estin, L. K., Faber, C., Facer, B. A., Fields, R., Fischer, S. R., Fliss, T. P., Frensley, C., Gates, S. N., Glattfelder, K. J., Halverson, K. R., Hart, M. R., Hohmann, J. G., Howell, M. P., Jeung, D. P, Johnson, R. A., Karr, P. T., Kawal, R., Kidney, J. M., Knapik, R. H., Kuan, C. L., Lake, J. H., Laramee, A. R., Larsen, K. D., Lau, C., Lemon, T. A., Liang, A. J., Liu, Y., Luong, L. T., Michaels, J., Morgan, J. J., Morgan, R. J., Mortrud, M. T., Mosqueda, N. F., Ng, L. L., Ng, R., Orta, G. J., Overly, C. C., Pak, T. H., Parry, S. E., Pathak, S. D., Pearson, O. C., Puchalski, R. B., Riley, Z. L., Rockett, H. R., Rowland, S. A., Royall, J. J., Ruiz, M. J., Sarno, N. R., Schaffnit, K., Shapovalova, N. V., Sivisay, T., Slaughterbeck, C. R., Smith, S. C., Smith, K. A., Smith, B. I., Sodt, A. J., Stewart, N. N., Stumpf, K. R., Sunkin, S. M., Sutram, M., Tam, A., Teemer, C. D., Thaller, C., Thompson, C. L., Varnam, L. R., Visel, A., Whitlock, R. M., Wohnoutka, P. E., Wolkey, C. K., Wong, V. Y., Wood, M., Yaylaoglu, M. B., Young, R. C., Youngstrom, B. L., Yuan, X. F., Zhang, B., Zwingman, T. A. & Jones, A. R. 2007. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168176.
  • Levine, E. M., Close, J., Fero, M., Ostrovsky, A. & Reh, T. A. 2000. p27(Kip1) regulates cell cycle withdrawal of late multipotent progenitor cells in the mammalian retina. Dev. Biol. 219, 299314.
  • Lukaszewicz, A., Savatier, P., Cortay, V., Giroud, P., Huissoud, C., Berland, M., Kennedy, H. & Dehay, C. 2005. G1 phase regulation, area-specific cell cycle control, and cytoarchitectonics in the primate cortex. Neuron 47, 353364.
  • Macpherson, D., Sage, J., Kim, T., Ho, D., McLaughlin, M. E. & Jacks, T. 2004. Cell type-specific effects of Rb deletion in the murine retina. Genes Dev. 18, 16811694.
  • Mairet-Coello, G., Tury, A., Van Buskirk, E., Robinson, K., Genestine, M. & Dicicco-Bloom, E. 2012. p57(KIP2) regulates radial glia and intermediate precursor cell cycle dynamics and lower layer neurogenesis in developing cerebral cortex. Development 139, 475487.
  • Marques-Torrejon, M. A., Porlan, E., Banito, A., Gomez-Ibarlucea, E., Lopez-Contreras, A. J., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Vidal, A., Gil, J., Torres, J. & Farinas, I. 2013. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 controls adult neural stem cell expansion by regulating Sox2 gene expression. Cell Stem Cell 12, 88100.
  • McClellan, K. A., Ruzhynsky, V. A., Douda, D. N., et al. 2007. Unique requirement for Rb/E2F3 in neuronal migration: evidence for cell cycle-independent functions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 48254843.
  • McEvoy, J., Flores-Otero, J., Zhang, J., Nemeth, K., Brennan, R., Bradley, C., Krafcik, F., Rodriguez-Galindo, C., Wilson, M., Xiong, S., Lozano, G., Sage, J., Fu, L., Louhibi, L., Trimarchi, J., Pani, A., Smeyne, R., Johnson, D. & Dyer, M. A. 2011. Coexpression of normally incompatible developmental pathways in retinoblastoma genesis. Cancer Cell 20, 260275.
  • Narita, M., Nunez, S., Heard, E., Lin, A. W., Hearn, S. A., Spector, D. L., Hannon, G. J. & Lowe, S. W. 2003. Rb-mediated heterochromatin formation and silencing of E2F target genes during cellular senescence. Cell 113, 703716.
  • Nguyen, L., Besson, A., Heng, J. I., Schuurmans, C., Teboul, L., Parras, C., Philpott, A., Roberts, J. M. & Guillemot, F. 2006. p27kip1 independently promotes neuronal differentiation and migration in the cerebral cortex. Genes Dev. 20, 15111524.
  • Nielsen, S. J., Schneider, R., Bauer, U. M., Bannister, A. J., Morrison, A., O'carroll, D., Firestein, R., Cleary, M., Jenuwein, T., Herrera, R. E. & Kouzarides, T. 2001. Rb targets histone H3 methylation and HP1 to promoters. Nature 412, 561565.
  • Novitch, B. G., Mulligan, G. J., Jacks, T. & Lassar, A. B. 1996. Skeletal muscle cells lacking the retinoblastoma protein display defects in muscle gene expression and accumulate in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 135, 441456.
  • Oshikawa, M., Okada, K., Nakajima, K. & Ajioka, I. 2013. Cortical excitatory neurons become protected from cell division during neurogenesis in an Rb family-dependent manner. Development 140, 23102320.
  • Pajcini, K. V., Corbel, S. Y., Sage, J., Pomerantz, J. H. & Blau, H. M. 2010. Transient inactivation of Rb and ARF yields regenerative cells from postmitotic mammalian muscle. Cell Stem Cell 7, 198213.
  • Pardee, A. B. 1974. A restriction point for control of normal animal cell proliferation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 12861290.
  • Parker, S. B., Eichele, G., Zhang, P., Rawls, A., Sands, A. T., Bradley, A., Olson, E. N., Harper, J. W. & Elledge, S. J. 1995. p53-independent expression of p21Cip1 in muscle and other terminally differentiating cells. Science 267, 10241027.
  • Rayman, J. B., Takahashi, Y., Indjeian, V. B., Dannenberg, J. H., Catchpole, S., Watson, R. J., Te Riele, H. & Dynlacht, B. D. 2002. E2F mediates cell cycle-dependent transcriptional repression in vivo by recruitment of an HDAC1/mSin3B corepressor complex. Genes Dev. 16, 933947.
  • Rockel, A. J., Hiorns, R. W. & Powell, T. P. 1980. The basic uniformity in structure of the neocortex. Brain 103, 221244.
  • Sage, C., Huang, M., Karimi, K., Gutierrez, G., Vollrath, M. A., Zhang, D. S., Garcia-Anoveros, J., Hinds, P. W., Corwin, J. T., Corey, D. P. & Chen, Z. Y 2005. Proliferation of functional hair cells in vivo in the absence of the retinoblastoma protein. Science 307, 11141118.
  • Sage, J., Miller, A. L., Perez-Mancera, P. A., Wysocki, J. M. & Jacks, T. 2003. Acute mutation of retinoblastoma gene function is sufficient for cell cycle re-entry. Nature 424, 223228.
  • Sage, J., Mulligan, G. J., Attardi, L. D., Miller, A., Chen, S., Williams, B., Theodorou, E. & Jacks, T. 2000. Targeted disruption of the three Rb-related genes leads to loss of G(1) control and immortalization. Genes Dev. 14, 30373050.
  • Schneider, J. W., Gu, W., Zhu, L., Mahdavi, V. & Nadal-Ginard, B. 1994. Reversal of terminal differentiation mediated by p107 in Rb-/- muscle cells. Science 264, 14671471.
  • Sdek, P., Zhao, P., Wang, Y., Huang, C. J., Ko, C. Y., Butler, P. C., Weiss, J. N. & Maclellan, W. R. 2011. Rb and p130 control cell cycle gene silencing to maintain the postmitotic phenotype in cardiac myocytes. J. Cell Biol. 194, 407423.
  • Sherr, C. J. & Roberts, J. M. 1999. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 13, 15011512.
  • Shirodkar, S., Ewen, M., DeCaprio, J. A., Morgan, J., Livingston, D. M. & Chittenden, T. 1992. The transcription factor E2F interacts with the retinoblastoma product and a p107-cyclin A complex in a cell cycle-regulated manner. Cell 68, 157166.
  • Skapek, S. X., Rhee, J., Spicer, D. B. & Lassar, A. B. 1995. Inhibition of myogenic differentiation in proliferating myoblasts by cyclin D1-dependent kinase. Science 267, 10221024.
  • Smith, E. J., Leone, G., Degregori, J., Jakoi, L. & Nevins, J. R. 1996. The accumulation of an E2F-p130 transcriptional repressor distinguishes a G0 cell state from a G1 cell state. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 69656976.
  • Svoboda, D. S., Paquin, A., Park, D. S. & Slack, R. S. 2013. Pocket proteins pRb and p107 are required for cortical lamination independent of apoptosis. Dev. Biol. 384, 101113.
  • Takahashi, Y., Rayman, J. B. & Dynlacht, B. D. 2000. Analysis of promoter binding by the E2F and pRB families in vivo: distinct E2F proteins mediate activation and repression. Genes Dev. 14, 804816.
  • Takai, H., Smogorzewska, A. & De Lange, T. 2003. DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres. Curr. Biol. 13, 15491556.
  • Tarui, T., Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R. S., Hayes, N. L., Bhide, P. G. & Caviness, V. S. 2005. Overexpression of p27 Kip 1, probability of cell cycle exit, and laminar destination of neocortical neurons. Cereb. Cortex 15, 13431355.
  • Turner, D. L. & Cepko, C. L. 1987. A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development. Nature 328, 131136.
  • Tury, A., Mairet-Coello, G. & Dicicco-Bloom, E. 2011. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p57Kip2 regulates cell cycle exit, differentiation, and migration of embryonic cerebral cortical precursors. Cereb. Cortex 21, 18401856.
  • Weintraub, S. J., Prater, C. A. & Dean, D. C. 1992. Retinoblastoma protein switches the E2F site from positive to negative element. Nature 358, 259261.
  • Xu, X. L., Fang, Y., Lee, T. C., Forrest, D., Gregory-Evans, C., Almeida, D., Liu, A., Jhanwar, S. C., Abramson, D. H. & Cobrinik, D. 2009. Retinoblastoma has properties of a cone precursor tumor and depends upon cone-specific MDM2 signaling. Cell 137, 10181031.
  • Young, R. W. 1985. Cell differentiation in the retina of the mouse. Anat. Rec. 212, 199205.
  • Zacksenhaus, E., Jiang, Z., Chung, D., Marth, J. D., Phillips, R. A. & Gallie, B. L. 1996. pRb controls proliferation, differentiation, and death of skeletal muscle cells and other lineages during embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 10, 30513064.
  • Zetterberg, A. & Larsson, O. 1985. Kinetic analysis of regulatory events in G1 leading to proliferation or quiescence of Swiss 3T3 cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 53655369.
  • Zhang, J., Benavente, C. A., Mcevoy, J., Flores-Otero, J., Ding, L., Chen, X., Ulyanov, A., Wu, G., Wilson, M., Wang, J., Brennan, R., Rusch, M., Manning, A. L., Ma, J., Easton, J., Shurtleff, S., Mullighan, C., Pounds, S., Mukatira, S., Gupta, P., Neale, G., Zhao, D., Lu, C., Fulton, R. S., Fulton, L. L., Hong, X., Dooling, D. J., Ochoa, K., Naeve, C., Dyson, N. J., Mardis, E. R., Bahrami, A., Ellison, D., Wilson, R. K., Downing, J. R. & Dyer, M. A. 2012. A novel retinoblastoma therapy from genomic and epigenetic analyses. Nature 481, 329334.
  • Zhang, J., Gray, J., Wu, L., Leone, G., Rowan, S., Cepko, C. L., Zhu, X., Craft, C. M. & Dyer, M. A. 2004a. Rb regulates proliferation and rod photoreceptor development in the mouse retina. Nat. Genet. 36, 351360.
  • Zhang, J., Schweers, B. & Dyer, M. A. 2004b. The first knockout mouse model of retinoblastoma. Cell Cycle 3, 952959.
  • Zhang, P., Wong, C., Liu, D., Finegold, M., Harper, J. W. & Elledge, S. J. 1999. p21(CIP1) and p57(KIP2) control muscle differentiation at the myogenin step. Genes Dev. 13, 213224.
  • Zindy, F., Cunningham, J. J., Sherr, C. J., Jogal, S., Smeyne, R. J. & Roussel, M. F. 1999. Postnatal neuronal proliferation in mice lacking Ink4d and Kip1 inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 1346213467.