• 1
    Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49(Suppl. 109): 814.
  • 2
    Mutch L, Alberman E, Hagberg B, Kodama K, Perat MV. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we now and where are we going? Dev Med Child Neurol 1992; 34: 54751.
  • 3
    Bartlett DJ, Hanna SE, Avery L, Stevenson RD, Galuppi B. Correlates of decline in gross motor capacity in adolescents with cerebral palsy in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels III to V: an exploratory study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010; 52: e15560.
  • 4
    Bartlett D, Purdie B. Testing of the spinal alignment and range of motion measure: a discriminative measure of posture and flexibility for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 73943.
  • 5
    Wright M, Bartlett DJ. Distribution of contractures and spinal malalignments in adolescents with cerebral palsy: observations and influences of function, gender and age. Dev Neurorehabil 2010; 13: 4652.
  • 6
    Fosang AL, Galea MP, McCoy AT, Reddihough DS, Story I. Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003; 45: 66470.
  • 7
    Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 73745.
  • 8
    Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 53949.
  • 9
    de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 54.
  • 10
    Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 110923.
  • 11
    Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 2007; 7: 5416.
  • 12
    Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Avery L, Lane M. Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 and GMFM-88): User's Manual. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 159. London: Mac Keith Press, 2002.
  • 13
    Ottenbacher KJ, Taylor ET, Msall ME, et al. The stability and equivalence reliability of the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM). Dev Med Child Neurol 1996; 38: 90716.
  • 14
    Colton T. Statistics in Medicine. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Co., 1974.
  • 15
    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
  • 16
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 4208.
  • 17
    Brunner HI, Klein-Gitelman MS, Miller MJ, et al. Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 15061.
  • 18
    Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, Skarr D. The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr 2003; 3: 32941.
  • 19
    Iyer LV, Haley SM, Watkins MP, Dumas HM. Establishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 88898.
  • 20
    Lin KC, Chen HF, Chen CL, et al. Validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important change of the Pediatric Motor Activity Log in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2012; 33: 5707.
  • 21
    Lee YC, Wu CY, Liaw MY, et al. Developmental profiles of preschool children with spastic diplegic and quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2010; 26: 3419.
  • 22
    Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 100818.