• 1
    Family CA. Attitudes towards disability shocking say UK families with disabled children. 2009. Available at: (accessed 20 December 2010).
  • 2
    Nowicki EA, Sandieson R. A meta-analysis of school-age children's attitudes towards persons with physical or intellectual disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2002; 49: 24365.
  • 3
    Son E, Parish SL, Peterson NA. National prevalence of peer victimization among young children with disabilities in the United States. Child Youth Serv Rev 2012; 34: 15405.
  • 4
    Graham S, Juvonen J. Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: an attributional analysis. Dev Psychol 1998; 34: 58799.
  • 5
    Allport Gordon W. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1954.
  • 6
    Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 2006; 90: 75183.
  • 7
    Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. Eur J Soc Psychol 2008; 38: 92234.
  • 8
    Department of Education. Support and aspiration: a new approach to special educational needs and disability. 2012. Available at: (accessed 29 May 2013).
  • 9
    Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster: University of Lancaster, 2006.
  • 10
    Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prev Med 2007; 45: 24751.
  • 11
    Graffi S, Minnes PM. Attitudes of primary school children toward the physical appearance and labels associated with Down syndrome. Am J Ment Retard 1988; 93: 2835.
  • 12
    Manetti M, Schneider BH, Siperstein G. Social acceptance of children with mental retardation: testing the contact hypothesis with an Italian sample. Int J Behav Dev 2001; 25: 27986.
  • 13
    Weisel A. Contact with mainstreamed disabled children and attitudes towards disability: a multidimensional analysis. Educ Psychol 1988; 8: 1618.
  • 14
    Blockberger S, Armstrong RW, O'Connor A, Freeman R. Children's attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication techniques. Augment Altern Commun 1993; 9: 24350.
  • 15
    Krajewski J, Flaherty T. Attitudes of high school students toward individuals with mental retardation. Ment Retard 2000; 38: 15462.
  • 16
    Kalyva E, Agaliotis I. Can contact affect Greek children's understanding of and attitudes towards peers with physical disabilities? Eur J Spec Needs Educ 2009; 24: 21320.
  • 17
    Siperstein GN, Parker RC, Bardon JN, Widaman KF. A national study of youth attitudes toward the inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities. Except Child 2007; 73: 43555.
  • 18
    Stager SF, Young RD. Intergroup contact and social outcomes for mainstreamed EMR adolescents. Am J Ment Defic 1981; 85: 497503.
  • 19
    Jaffe J. Attitudes of adolescents toward the mentally retarded. Am J Ment Defic 1966; 70: 90712.
  • 20
    Strauch JD. Social contact as a variable in the expressed attitudes of normal adolescents toward EMR pupils. Except Child 1970; 36: 495500.
  • 21
    Condon ME, York R, Heal LW, Fortschneider J. Acceptance of severely handicapped students by nonhandicapped peers. J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps 1986; 11: 2169.
  • 22
    Townsend MA, Wilton K, Vakilirad T. Children's attitudes toward peers with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 1993; 37: 40511.
  • 23
    Archie VW, Sherrill C. Attitudes toward handicapped peers of mainstreamed and nonmainstreamed children in physical education. Percept Mot Skills 1989; 69: 31922.
  • 24
    Barrett J, Kitchenham A. An analysis of Q-variables associated with attitudes toward adolescent handicapped peers. J Spec Educ 1992; 16: 20111.
  • 25
    Maras P, Brown R. Effects of different forms of school contact on children's attitudes toward disabled and non-disabled peers. Br J Educ Psychol 2000; 70: 33751.
  • 26
    Tripp A, French R, Sherrill C. Contact theory and attitudes of children in physical education programs toward peers with disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q 1995; 12: 32332.
  • 27
    Schaffer HR. Social Development. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1996.
  • 28
    Arampatzi A, Mouratidou K, Evaggelinou C, Koidou E, Barkoukis V. Social developmental parameters in primary schools: inclusive settings' and gender differences on pupils' aggressive and social insecure behaviour and their attitudes towards disability. Int J Spec Educ 2011; 26: 5869.
  • 29
    Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Heidelberg: Springer, 1985: 1139.
  • 30
    Campbell M. An application of the theory of planned behavior to examine the impact of classroom inclusion on elementary school students. [Research Support, Non-US Gov't. J Evid Based Soc Work 2010; 7: 23550.
  • 31
    Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Austin , Worchel S, editors. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1079: 3347.
  • 32
    Hastings RP, Graham S. Adolescents' perceptions of young people with severe learning difficulties: the effects of integration schemes and frequency of contact. Educ Psychol 1995; 15: 14959.
  • 33
    Rosenbaum PL, Armstrong RW, King SM. Children's attitudes toward disabled peers: a self-report measure. [Research Support, Non-US Gov't. J Pediatr Psychol 1986; 11: 51730.
  • 34
    King SM, Rosenbaum P, Armstrong RW, Milner R. An epidemiological study of children's attitudes toward disability. [Research Support, Non-US Gov't]. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989; 31: 23745.
  • 35
    Tirosh E, Schanin M, Reiter S. Children's attitudes toward peers with disabilities: the Israeli perspective. [Comparative study]. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 8114.
  • 36
    Vignes C, Godeau E, Sentenac M, et al. Determinants of students' attitudes towards peers with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51: 4739.
  • 37
    McDougall J, DeWit DJ, King G, Miller LT, Killip S. High school-aged youths' attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: the role of school and student interpersonal factors. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2004; 51: 287313.
  • 38
    Yuker HE, Block J, Younng JH. The Measurement of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center, 1966.
  • 39
    Sigler G, Mabee W, Lazar A. Children's attitude toward handicapped students as a result of mainstreamed settings. Ment Retard Bull 1978; 6: 927.
  • 40
    Smith DB, Larson PA. Adolescent attitudes toward disabled persons in an integrated and nonintegrated school setting. Education 1980; 100: 3904.
  • 41
    Thomas SA, Foreman PE, Remenyi AG. The effects of previous contact with physical disability upon Australian children's attitudes toward people with physical disabilities. Int J Rehabil Res 1985; 8: 6970.
  • 42
    Sandberg LD. Attitudes of nonhandicapped elementary school students toward school-aged trainable mentally retarded students. Educ Train Ment Retard 1982; 17: 304.
  • 43
    Brewer N, Smith JM. Social acceptance of mentally retarded children in regular schools in relation to years mainstreamed. Psychol Rep 1989; 64: 37580.
  • 44
    Helmstetter E, Peck CA, Giangreco MF. Outcomes of interactions with peers with moderate or severe disabilities: a statewide survey of high school students. J Assoc Pers Serv Handicaps 1994; 19: 26376.
  • 45
    Rossiter L, Horvath P. The effects of integration, social contact, and information on attitudes toward persons with special needs. Can J Spec Educ 1996; 11: 7999.
  • 46
    Nikolaraizi M, Kumar P, Favazza P, Sideridis G, Koulousiou D, Riall A. A cross-cultural examination of typically developing children's attitudes toward individuals with special needs. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2005; 52: 10119.
  • 47
    Hazzard A. Children's experience with, knowledge of, and attitude toward disabled persons. J Spec Educ 1983; 17: 1319.
  • 48
    Gordon RA. Social desirability bias: a demonstration and technique for its reduction. Teach Psychol 1987; 14: 402.
  • 49
    McConkey R, McCormack B, Naughton M. A national survey of young people's perceptions of mental handicap. J Intellect Disabil Res 1983; 27: 17183.
  • 50
    Peterson GF. Factors related to the attitudes of nonretarded children toward their EMR peers. Am J Ment Defic 1974; 79: 4126.
  • 51
    Gillies P, Shackley T. Adolescents' views of their physically handicapped peers: a comparative study. Educ Res 1988; 30: 1049.
  • 52
    Maras P, Brown R. Effects of contact on children's attitudes toward disability: a longitudinal study. J Appl Soc Psychol 1996; 26: 211334.
  • 53
    Hewstone M, Swart H. Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: from hypothesis to integrated theory. Br J Soc Psychol 2011; 50: 37486.
  • 54
    Vignes C, Coley N, Grandjean H, Godeau E, Arnaud C. Measuring children's attitudes towards peers with disabilities: a review of instruments. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 1829.
  • 55
    Tausch N, Hewstone M, Kenworthy JB, et al. Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. J Pers Soc Psychol 2010; 99: 282302.
  • 56
    Block ME. Development and validation of the Children's Attitudes Toward Integrated Physical Education-Revised (CAIPE-R) inventory. Adapt Phys Activ Q 1995; 12: 6077.
  • 57
    Rapier J, Adelson R, Carey R, Croke K. Changes in children's attitudes toward the physically handicapped. Except Child 1972; 39: 21933.
  • 58
    Yuker HE, Block J. Research with the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons scales (ATDP) 1960–1985. New York, NY: Hofstra University, 1986.
  • 59
    Voeltz LM. Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. Am J of Ment Defic 1980; 84: 45564.
  • 60
    Bagley MT, Green JF, editors. Peers Attitudes Toward the Handicapped Scale (PATHS). Austin, TX: PRO-ED, 1984.
  • 61
    Wheeler VA, Ladd GW. Assessment of children's self-efficacy for social interactions with peers. Dev Psychol 1982; 18: 795.
  • 62
    Antonak RF, Livneh H. The Measurement of Attitudes Toward People with Disabilities: Methods, Psychometrics and Scales. Springfield IL: Charles C Thomas, 1988.
  • 63
    Devenney MJ, Stratford B. Attitudes to the disabled. Int J Rehabil Res 1983; 6: 2057.
  • 64
    Siperstein GN, Bak JJ, Gottlieb J. Effects of group discussion on children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. J Educ Res 1977; 70: 1314.
  • 65
    Siperstein GN, Gottlieb J. Physical stigma and academic performance as factors affecting children's first impressions of handicapped peers. [Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.]. Am J Ment Defic 1977; 81: 45562.
  • 66
    Abrams D, Jackson D. St. Social identity and the handicapping functions of stereotypes: children's understanding of mental and physical handicap. Hum Rel 1990; 43: 108598.
  • 67
    Beh-Pajooh A. The effect of social contact on college students' attitudes toward severely handicapped students and their educational integration. J Ment Defic Res 1991; 35(Pt 4): 33952.
  • 68
    Gottlieb J, Gottlieb BW. Stereotypic attitudes and behavioral intentions toward handicapped children. Am J Ment Defic 1977; 82: 6571.
  • 69
    Bogardus ES. Measuring social distances. J Appl Soc 1925; 9: 229308.
  • 70
    Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The Measurement of Measuring. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
  • 71
    Gough HG. Reference handbook for the Gough Adjective Check-List. Berkley: University of California Institute of Pesonality Assessment and Research, 1955.
  • 72
    Gash H, Coffey D. Influences on Attitudes towards Children with Mental Handicap. Eur J Spec Needs Educ 1995; 10: 116.
  • 73
    Antonak RF, Harth R. Psychometric analysis and revision of the Mental Retardation Attitude Inventory. Ment Retard 1994; 32: 272.
  • 74
    Siperstein GN, Chatillon AC. Importance of perceived similarity in improving children's attitudes toward mentally retarded peers. Am J Ment Defic 1982; 86: 4538.
  • 75
    Siperstein GN, Bak JJ. Effects of social behavior on children's attitudes toward their mildly and moderately mentally retarded peers. [Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.]. Am J Ment Defic 1985; 90: 31927.
  • 76
    Coie JD, Dodge KA, Coppotelli H. Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Dev Psychol 1982; 18: 557.
  • 77
    McConkey R, Walsh J, Mulcahy M. Mentally handicapped adults living in the community—a survey conducted in and around the City of Dublin (APEX). J Br Inst Ment Handicap 1982; 10: 903.
  • 78
    Siperstein GN. Instruments for Measuring Children's Attitudes Toward the Handicapped. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts, 1980.
  • 79
    Favazza P, Odom S. The Acceptance Scale, Revised. Boulder, CO: Roots and Wings, 1999.
  • 80
    Harth R. Attitudes towards minority groups as a construct in assessing attitudes towards the mentally retarded. Educ Train Ment Retard 1971; 6: 1427.
  • 81
    Wolraich ML, Siperstein GN. Assessing professionals' prognostic impressions of mental retardation. Mental Retard 1983; 21: 812.
  • 82
    Friedman RS, editor. The Peer-Peer Program: A Model Project for the Integration of Severely Physically Handicapped Youngsters with Nondisabled Peers. New York: Human Resources School, 1977.
  • 83
    Fenrick NJ, Petersen TK. Developing positive changes in attitudes towards moderately/severely handicapped students through a peer tutoring program. Educ Train Ment Retard 1984; 19: 8390.
  • 84
    Siller J. Structure of Attitudes Toward the Physically Disabled: Disability Factor Scales-Amputations, Blindness, Cosmetic Conditions. New York: New York University School of Education, 1967.