SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Acemoglu, D. and Cao, D. V. (2010). Innovation by entrants and incumbents. NBER Working Paper no. 16411.
  • Acemoglu, D. and Linn, J. (2004). Market size and innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 104990.
  • Adams, J. and Clemmons, J. R. (2008). Invention and discovery in science-based firms. Mimeo, University of Florida.
  • Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 32351.
  • Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (2009). The Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P. and Prantl, S. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 2032.
  • Amemiya, T. (1978). The estimation of a simultaneous equation generalized probit model. Econometrica, 46(5), 1193205.
  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Innovative Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Baum, C. F., Wiggins, V., Stillman, S. and Schaffer, M. E. (1999). OVERID: Stata module to calculate tests of overidentifying restrictions after ivreg, ivreg2, ivreg29, ivprobit, ivtobit, reg3. Statistical Software Components S396902, Boston College Department of Economics; revised 26 April 2010.
  • Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980). Uncertainty, industrial structure and the speed of R&D. Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 128.
  • De Bondt, R. and Vandekerckhove, J. (2008). Innovation races with reward sharing. Review of Business and Economics, 53, 35474.
  • Etro, F. (2004). Innovation by leaders. Economic Journal, 114(495), 281303.
  • Etro, F. (2006). Aggressive leaders. RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 14654.
  • Etro, F. (2007). Competition, Innovation, and Antitrust. Berlin: Springer.
  • Etro, F. (2008). Stackelberg competition with endogenous entry. Economic Journal, 118(532), 128.
  • Eurostat (2004). Innovation in Europe results for the EU, Iceland and Norway. Panorama of the European Union: Edition 2004. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
  • Eurostat (2008). Science, Technology and Innovation in Europe. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
  • Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D. (1982). Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 72(3), 51426.
  • Greene, W. (2003). Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Griliches, Z. and Mairesse, J. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 15275.
  • Gschwandtner, A. and Lambson, V. E. (2012). Sunk costs, depreciation and industry dynamics. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 105965.
  • Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 127391.
  • Hausman, J. (1983). Specification and estimation of simultaneous equations models. In Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator (eds), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Kováč, E., Vinogradov, V. and Žigić, K. (2010). Technological leadership and the persistence of monopoly under endogenous entry: static versus dynamic analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(8), 142141.
  • Lee, L. F. (1992). Amemiya's generalized least squares and tests of overidentification in simultaneous equation models with qualitative or limited dependent variables. Econometric Reviews, 11(3), 31928.
  • Lyons, B., Matraves, C. and Moffatt, P. (2001). Industrial concentration and market integration in the European Union. Economica, 68, 126.
  • Maci, I. and Žigić, K. (2011). Competition policy and market leaders. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 10429.
  • Newey, W. K. (1987). Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogeneous explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics, 36, 23150.
  • OECD and Eurostat (1997). Oslo Manual—Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD.
  • Reinganum, J. F. (1985). Innovation and industry evolution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100, 8199.
  • Segerstrom, P. (2007). Intel economics. International Economic Review, 48(1), 24780.
  • Smith, R. and Blundell, R. (1986). An exogeneity test for a simultaneous equation Tobit model with an application to labor supply. Econometrica, 54(3), 67985.
  • Staiger, D. and Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 55786.
  • Sutton, J. (1998). Technology and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Sutton, J. (2007). Market structure: theory and evidence. In M. Armstrong and R. Porter (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 230168.
  • Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.