• 1
    Zamorano JL, Bax JJ, Rademakers FE, et al: Evaluation of Systolic and Diastolic LV Function. The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Imaging. New York: Springer, 2010, pp. 307320.
  • 2
    Dorosz JL, Lezotte DC, Weitzenkamp DA, et al: Performance of 3-dimensional echocardiography in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:17991808.
  • 3
    Myles PS, Cui JI: Using the Bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007;99:309311.
  • 4
    Alfakih K, Plein S, Thiele H, et al: Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:323329.
  • 5
    Cain PA, Ahl R, Hedstrom E, et al: Age and gender specific normal values of left ventricular mass, volume and function for gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging: A cross sectional study. BMC Med Imaging 2009;9:2.
  • 6
    Nikitin NP, Huan Loh P, de Silva R, et al: Left ventricular morphology, global and longitudinal function in normal older individuals: A cardiac magnetic resonance study. Int J Cardiol 2006;108:7683.
  • 7
    Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al: Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:14401463.
  • 8
    Aune E, Bækkevar M, Rødevand O, et al: Reference values for left ventricular volumes with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. Scand Cardiovasc J 2010;44:2430.
  • 9
    Fukuda S, Watanabe H, Daimon M, et al: Normal values of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic parameters in a Healthy Japanese Population: The JAMP-3D Study. Circ J 2012;76:11771181.
  • 10
    Chahal NS, Lim TK, Jain P, et al: Population-based reference values for 3D echocardiographic LV volumes and ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:11911197.
  • 11
    Wang SY, Cheng MF, Hwang JJ, et al: Sex-specific normal limits of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes estimated by gated myocardial perfusion imaging in adult patients in Taiwan: A comparison between two quantitative methods. Nucl Med Commun 2011;32:113120.
  • 12
    Nakajima K, Kusuoka H, Nishimura S, et al: Normal limits of ejection fraction and volumes determined by gated SPECT in clinically normal patients without cardiac events: A study based on the J-ACCESS database. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:10881096.
  • 13
    Hor G, Schicha H, Standke R: Normal values in equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. Results of a multicenter study. Nuklearmedizin 1990;29:186194.
  • 14
    Pfisterer ME, Battler A, Zaret BL: Range of normal values for left and right ventricular ejection fraction at rest and during exercise assessed by radionuclide angiocardiography. Eur Heart J 1985;6:647655.
  • 15
    Jongjirasiri S, Sritara C, Waeosak P, et al: Normal data of left ventricular parameters in non-hypertensive patients using 320-slice cardiac CT: A study on intra- and interobserver variability. J Med Assoc Thai 2011;94:10531060.
  • 16
    Hoffmann R, von Bardeleben S, ten Cate F, et al: Assessment of systolic left ventricular function: A multi-centre comparison of cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2005;26:607616.
  • 17
    Mor-Avi V, Jenkins C, Kühl HP, et al: Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: Multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:413423.
  • 18
    Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al: Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000;21:13871396.
  • 19
    Mistry N, Halvorsen S, Hoffmann P, et al: Assessment of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance imaging vs. echocardiography, contrast echocardiography, and single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010;11:793800.
  • 20
    Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, et al: Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:10301035.
  • 21
    Jacobs LD, Salgo IS, Goonewardena S, et al: Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data. Eur Heart J 2006;27:460468.
  • 22
    Marsan NA, Westenberg JJ, Roes SD, et al: Three-dimensional echocardiography for the preoperative assessment of patients with left ventricular aneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:113121.
  • 23
    Gutierrez-Chico JL, Zamorano JL, Perez de Isla L, et al: Comparison of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions measured by three-dimensional echocardiography versus by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with various cardiomyopathies. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:809813.
  • 24
    Jenkins C, Chan J, Hanekom L, et al: Accuracy and feasibility of online 3-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:11191128.
  • 25
    Chukwu EO, Barasch E, Mihalatos DG, et al: Relative importance of errors in left ventricular quantitation by two-dimensional echocardiography: Insights from three-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:990997.
  • 26
    Caiani EG, Corsi C, Zamorano J, et al: Improved semiautomated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using 3-dimensional echocardiography with a full matrix-array transducer: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:779788.
  • 27
    Chang S, Lee S, Kim E, et al: Feasibility of single-beat full-volume capture real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and auto-contouring algorithm for quantification of left ventricular volume: Validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:853859.
  • 28
    Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, et al: Assessment of left ventricular mass and volumes by three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with or without wall motion abnormalities: Comparison against cine magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 2008;94:10501057.
  • 29
    Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al: Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: Side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 2006;114:654661.
  • 30
    Qi X, Cogar B, Hsiung MC, et al: Live/real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and mass compared with magnetic resonance imaging. Echocardiography 2007;24:166173.
  • 31
    Soliman OI, Krenning BJ, Geleijnse ML, et al: A comparison between QLAB and TomTec full volume reconstruction for real time three-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes. Echocardiography 2007;24:967974.
  • 32
    Macron L, Lim P, Bensaid A, et al: Single-beat versus multibeat real-time 3D echocardiography for assessing left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: A comparison study with cardiac magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:450455.
  • 33
    Thavendiranathan P, Liu S, Verhaert D, et al: Feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of real-time full-volume 3D transthoracic echocardiography to measure LV volumes and systolic function: A fully automated endocardial contouring algorithm in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging 2012;5:239251.
  • 34
    Thavendiranathan P, Grant AD, Negishi T, et al: Reproducibility of echocardiographic techniques for sequential assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: Application to patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:7784.
  • 35
    Forthover RN, Lee SL, Hernandez M. Biostatistics: A Guide to Design, Analysis, and Discovery. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2007, pp. 50–51, 60–62, 425.
  • 36
    Karamitsos TD, Hudsmith LE, Selvanayagam JB, et al: Operator induced variability in left ventricular measurements with cardiovascular magnetic resonance is improved after training. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:777783.
  • 37
    Maffei E, Messalli G, Martini C, et al: Left and right ventricle assessment with Cardiac CT: Validation study vs cardiac MR. Eur Radiol 2012;22:10411049.
  • 38
    Childs H, Ma L, Ma M, et al: Comparison of long and short axis quantification of left ventricular volume parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, with ex-vivo validation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:40. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-40.
  • 39
    Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, Reduto LA, et al: A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1981;64:744753.
  • 40
    Dumesnil JG, Dion D, Yvorchuk K, et al: A new, simple and accurate method for determining ejection fraction by Doppler echocardiography. Can J Cardiol 1995;11:10071014.
  • 41
    Baran AO, Rogal GJ, Nanda NC: Ejection fraction determination without planimetry by two-dimensional echocardiography: A new method. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1:14711478.
  • 42
    Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, et al: Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: Echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 1976;37:711.
  • 43
    Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al: Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006;7:79108.
  • 44
    Lin C, Kuo C, Wang C, et al: Left ventricular systolic function is sensitive to cycle-length irregularity in patients with atrial fibrillation and systolic dysfunction. Acta Cardiol Sin 2012;28:103110.
  • 45
    Bull SC, Main ML, Stevens GR, et al: Cardiac toxicity screening by echocardiography in healthy volunteers: A study of the effects of diurnal variation and use of a core laboratory on the reproducibility of left ventricular function measurement. Echocardiography 2011;28:502507.
  • 46
    Yamani H, Cai Q, Ahmad M: Three-dimensional echocardiography in evaluation of left ventricular indices. Echocardiography 2012;29:6675.
  • 47
    Jenkins C, Moir S, Chan J, et al: Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: A comparison of left ventricular opacification, three-dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2009;30:98106.
  • 48
    Blondheim DS, Beeri R, Feinberg MS, et al: Reliability of visual assessment of global and segmental left ventricular function: A multicenter study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:258264.
  • 49
    Holloway CJ, Edwards LM, Rider OJ, et al: A comparison of visual and quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27:563569.
  • 50
    van Geuns RJ, Baks T, Gronenschild EH, et al: Automatic quantitative left ventricular analysis of cine MR images by using three-dimensional information for contour detection. Radiology 2006;240:215221.
  • 51
    Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, et al: Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2006;151:736744.
  • 52
    Annuar BR, Liew CK, Chin SP, et al: Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: A comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol 2008;65:112119.
  • 53
    Sarwar A, Shapiro MD, Nasir K, et al: Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: A comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:170177.
  • 54
    Xie BQ, Tian YQ, Zhang J, et al: Evaluation of left and right ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood-pool SPECT in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: Comparison with cardiac MRI. J Nucl Med 2012;53:584591.
  • 55
    Sibille L, Bouallegue FB, Bourdon A, et al: Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation. Nucl Med Commun 2011;32:121128.