SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akerlof, G. (1970). ‘The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 84(3), pp. 488500.
  • Barseghyan, L., Prince, J. and Teitelbaum, J. (2011a). ‘Are risk preferences stable across contexts? evidence from insurance data’, American Economic Review, vol. 101, pp. 591631.
  • Barseghyan, L., Molinari, F., O'Donoghue, E. and Teitelbaum, J. (2011b). ‘The nature of risk preferences: evidence from insurance choices’, Working Paper, Cornell University.
  • Cardon, J. and Hendel, I. (2001). ‘Asymmetric information in health insurance: evidence from the national medical expenditure survey’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 32(3), pp. 40827.
  • Cawley, J. and Philipson, T. (1999). ‘An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance’, American Economic Review, vol. 89(4), pp. 82746.
  • Chassagnon, A. and Chiappori, A. (2005). ‘Insurance under moral hazard and adverse selection: efficiency and competition’, Working Paper, Laval - Laboratoire Econometrie.
  • Chassagnon, A. and Villeneuve, B. (2005). ‘Efficient risk sharing under adverse selection and subjective risk perception’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 38, pp. 95578.
  • Chiappori, A., Jullien, B., Salanié, B. and Salanié, F. (2006). ‘Asymmetric information in insurance: general testable implications’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 37(4), pp. 78398.
  • Chiappori, P. and Salanié, B. (1997). ‘Empirical contract theory: the case of insurance data’, European Economic Review, vol. 41(3), pp. 94350.
  • Chiappori, P. and Salanié, B. (2000). ‘Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108(1), pp. 5678.
  • Chiappori, P. and Salanié, B. (2012). ‘Asymmetric information in insurance markets: predictions and tests’ forthcoming in (G. Dionne, ed.). Handbook of Insurance, 2nd edn, Boston, MA: Springer.
  • Cohen, A. and Einav, L. (2007). ‘Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice’, American Economic Review, vol. 97(3), pp. 74588.
  • Cohen, A. and Siegelman, P. (2010). ‘Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 77(1), pp. 3984.
  • de Meza, D. and Webb, D. (2001). ‘Advantageous selection in insurance markets’, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 32, pp. 6881.
  • DellaVigna, S. and Malmendier, U. (2004). ‘Contract design and self-control: theory and evidence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119(2), pp. 353402.
  • Einav, L., Finkelstein, A. and Cullen, M. (2010a). ‘Estimating welfare in insurance markets using variation in prices’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 125(3), pp. 877921.
  • Einav, L., Finkelstein, A. and Levin, J. (2010b). ‘Beyond testing: empirical models of insurance markets’, Annual Review of Economics, vol. 2, pp. 31136.
  • Einav, L., Finkelstein, A. and Schrimpf, P. (2010c). ‘Optimal mandates and the welfare cost of asymmetric information: evidence from the U.K. annuity market’, Econometrica, vol. 78(3), pp. 103192.
  • Eliaz, K. and Spiegler, R. (2008). ‘Consumer optimism and price discrimination’, Theoretical Economics, vol. 3, pp. 45997.
  • Ellison, G. (2006). ‘Bounded rationality in industrial organization’, in (R. Blundell, W. Newey and T. Persson, eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, pp. 14274, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fang, H., Keane, M. and Silverman, D. (2008). ‘Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the medigap insurance market’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 116(2), pp. 30350.
  • Finkelstein, A. and McGarry, K. (2006). ‘Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market’, American Economic Review, vol. 96(4), pp. 93858.
  • Finn, P. and Bragg, B. (1986). ‘Perception of the risk of an accident by young and old drivers’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 18(4), pp. 28998.
  • Gabaix, X. and Laibson, D. (2006). ‘Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 121(2), pp. 50540.
  • Grubb, M. (2009). ‘Selling to overconfident consumers’, American Economic Review, vol. 99(5), pp. 1770807.
  • Huang, R., Liu, Y. and Tzeng, L. (2007). ‘Hidden overconfidence and advantageous selection’, Working Paper, National Taiwan University.
  • Jeleva, M. and Villeneuve, B. (2004). ‘Insurance contracts with imprecise probabilities and adverse selection’, Economic Theory, vol. 23, pp. 77794.
  • Jullien, B. (2000). ‘Participation constraints in adverse selection models’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 93, pp. 147.
  • Jullien, B., Salanié, B. and Salanié, F. (2007). ‘Screening risk-averse agents under moral hazard: single-crossing and the CARA case’, Economic Theory, vol. 30(1), pp. 15169.
  • Katapodi, M., Lee, K., Facione, N. and Dodd, M. (2004). ‘Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review’, Preventive Medicine, vol. 38(4), pp. 388402.
  • Köszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2007). ‘Mistakes in choice-based welfare analysis’, American Economic Review, vol. 97(2), pp. 47781.
  • Koufopoulos, K. (2008). ‘Asymmetric information, heterogeneity in risk perceptions and insurances: an explanation to a puzzle’, Discussion Paper No. 42, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Landier, A. and Thesmar, D. (2009). ‘Financial contracting with optimistic entrepreneurs’, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 22(1), pp. 11750.
  • Makki, S. and Somwaru, A. (2001). ‘Evidence of adverse selection in crop insurance markets’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 68(4), pp. 685708.
  • Malmendier, U., Tate, G. and Yan, J. (2011). ‘Overconfidence and early-life experiences: the effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies’, Journal of Finance, vol. 66(5), pp. 1687733.
  • Manski, C. (2004). ‘Measuring expectations’, Econometrica, vol. 72(5), pp. 132976.
  • Peacock, W., Brody, S. and Highfield, W. (2005). ‘Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida's single family homeowners’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 73(2–3), pp. 12035.
  • Polednak, A., Lane, D. and Burg, M. (1991). ‘Risk perception, family history, and use of breast cancer screening tests’, Cancer Detection and Prevention, vol. 15(4), pp. 25763.
  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J. (1976). ‘Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 90, pp. 63049.
  • Sandroni, A. and Squintani, F. (2007). ‘Overconfidence, insurance and paternalism’, American Economic Review, vol. 97(5), pp. 19942004.
  • Sandroni, A. and Squintani, F. (2010). ‘Overconfidence and adverse selection: the case of insurance’, Working Paper, Northwestern and Essex Universities.
  • Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk, London: Earthscan.
  • Spiegler, R. (2011). Bounded Rationality and Industrial Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Spinnewijn, J. (2009). ‘Unemployed but optimistic: optimal insurance design with biased beliefs’, Working Paper, MIT.
  • Spinnewijn, J. (2012). ‘Heterogeneity, demand for insurance and adverse selection’, Discussion Paper No. 8833, CEPR.
  • Tränkle, U., Gelau, C. and Metker, T. (1990). ‘Risk perception and age-specific accidents of young drivers’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 22(2), pp. 11925.
  • Villeneuve, B. (2005). ‘Competition between insurers with superior information’, European Economic Review, vol. 49, pp. 32140.