SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aaronson, D. (1998). ‘Using sibling data to estimate the impact of neighborhoods on children's educational outcomes’, Journal of Human Resources, vol. 33(4), pp. 91546.
  • Akerlof, G. (1997). ‘Social distance and social decisions’, Econometrica, vol. 65(5), pp. 100527.
  • Allen, R., Burgess, S. and Key, T. (2010). ‘Choosing secondary school by moving home: school quality and the formation of neighbourhood’, Working Paper 10/238, CMPO.
  • Altonji, J.G., Elder, T.E. and Taber, C.R. (2005). ‘Selection on observed and unobserved variables: assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 113(1), pp. 15184.
  • Ammermueller, A. and Pischke, J.-S. (2009). ‘Peer effects in European primary schools: evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 27(3), pp. 31548.
  • Anderson, M.L. (2008). ‘Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: a reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry preschool, and early training projects’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 103(484), pp. 148195.
  • Angrist, J. and Lang, K. (2004). ‘Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco program’, American Economic Review, vol. 94(5), pp. 161334.
  • Angrist, J.D., Lang, D. and Oreopolous, P. (2009). ‘Incentives and services for college achievement: evidence from a randomized trial’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 1(1), pp. 129.
  • Angrist, J.D. and Lavy, V. (2009). ‘The effect of high-stakes high school achievement awards: evidence from a randomized trial’, American Economic Review, vol. 99(4), pp. 1384414.
  • Argys, L.M., Rees, D.I. and Brewer, D.J. (1996). ‘Detracking America's schools: equity at zero cost?’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 15(4), pp. 62345.
  • Bayer, P., Ross, L. and Topa, G. (2008). ‘Place of work and place of residence: informal hiring networks and labour market outcomes’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 116(6), pp. 115096.
  • Bernheim, B. (1994). ‘A theory of conformity’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 102(5), pp. 84177.
  • Bolster, A., Burgess, S., Johnston, R., Jones, K., Propper, C. and Sarker, R. (2007). ‘Neighbourhoods, households and income dynamics: a semi-parametric investigation of neighbourhood effects’, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 7(1), pp. 138.
  • Card, D. and Rothstein, J. (2007). ‘Racial segregation and the black-white test score gap’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 91(11–12), pp. 215884.
  • Cheshire, P., Gibbons, S. and Gordon, I. (2008). ‘Policies for “mixed communities”: a critical evaluation’, Policy Paper 2, SERC.
  • Corcoran, M., Gordon, R., Laren, D. and Solon, G. (1989). ‘Effects of family and community background on men's economic status’, Working Paper 2896, NBER.
  • Crane, J. (1991). ‘The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 96(5), pp. 122659.
  • Currie, J. (2006). The Invisible Safety Net, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Cutler, D. and Glaeser, E. (1997). ‘Are ghettos good or bad?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112(3), pp. 82772.
  • Durlauf, S. (1996). ‘A theory of persistent income inequality’, Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 1(1), pp. 7593.
  • Edin, P., Fredriksson, P. and Aslund, O. (2003). ‘Ethnic enclaves and the economic success of immigrants – evidence from a natural experiment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 118(1), pp. 32957.
  • Edin, P., Fredriksson, P., Gronqvist, H. and Aslund, O. (2011). ‘Peers, neighbourhoods and immigrant student achievement – evidence from a placement policy’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 3(2), pp. 6795.
  • Fehr, E. and Falk, A. (2002). ‘Psychological foundations of incentives’, European Economic Review, vol. 46(4–5), pp. 687724.
  • Gibbons, S. (2002). ‘Neighbourhood effects on educational achievement’, Discussion Paper 18, CEE.
  • Gibbons, S., Machin, S. and Silva, O. (2008). ‘Choice, competition and student achievement’, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 6(4), pp. 91247.
  • Gibbons, S., Machin, S. and Silva, O. (2013). ‘Valuing school quality using boundary discontinuity regressions’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 75(1), pp. 1528.
  • Gibbons, S. and Silva, O. (2008). ‘Urban density and student attainment’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 63(1), pp. 63150.
  • Gibbons, S. and Telhaj, S. (2008). ‘Peers and achievement in England's secondary schools’, Discussion Paper 1, SERC.
  • Gibbons, S. and Telhaj, S. (2011). ‘Mobility and school disruption’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 95(9–10), pp. 115667.
  • Glaeser, E. and Scheinkman, J. (2001). ‘Measuring social interactions’, in (S. Durlauf and P. Young, eds.), Social Dynamics, pp. 83130, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gould, E., Lavy, V. and Paserman, D. (2004). ‘Immigrating to opportunity: estimating the effect of school quality using a natural experiment on Ethiopians in Israel’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119(2), pp. 489526.
  • Gould, E., Lavy, V. and Paserman, D. (2011a). ‘Does immigration affect the long-term educational outcomes of natives? Quasi-experimental evidence’, Economic Journal, vol. 119(540), pp. 124369.
  • Gould, E., Lavy, V. and Paserman, D. (2011b). ‘Sixty years after the magic carpet ride: the long-run effect of the early childhood environment on social and economic outcomes’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 78(3), pp. 93873.
  • Goux, D. and Maurin, E. (2007). ‘Close neighbours matter: neighbourhood effects on early performance at school’, Economic Journal, vol. 117(523), pp. 1193215.
  • Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a Job, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hanushek, E. and Woessmann, L. (2006). ‘Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries’, Economic Journal, vol. 116(510), pp. C6376.
  • Hanushek, E., Kain, J., Markman, J. and Rivkin, S. (2003). ‘Does peer ability affect student achievement?’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 18(5), pp. 52744.
  • Hanushek, E., Kain, J. and Rivkin, S. (2004). ‘Disruption versus Tiebout improvement: the costs and benefits of switching schools’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 88(9–10), pp. 172146.
  • Harding, D., Gennetian, L., Winship, C., Sanbonmatsu, L. and Kling, J. (2010). ‘Unpacking neighborhood influences on education outcomes: setting the stage for future research’, Working Paper 16055, NBER.
  • Hobbs, G. and Vignoles, A. (2010). ‘Is children's free school meal “eligibility” a good proxy for family income?’, British Educational Research Journal, vol. 36(4), pp. 67390.
  • Hoxby, C. (2000). ‘Peer effects in the classroom: learning from gender and race variation’, Working Paper 7867, NBER.
  • Hoxby, C. and Weingarth, G. (2005). Taking Race Out of the Equation, School Reassignment and the Structure of Peer Effects, mimeo, Harvard University.
  • Jacob, B. (2004). ‘Public housing, housing vouchers, and student achievement: evidence from public housing demolitions in Chicago’, American Economic Review, vol. 94(1), pp. 23358.
  • Jencks, C. and Mayer, S. (1990). ‘The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighbourhood’, (in L. Lynn, ed.), Inner City Poverty in the United States, pp. 11186, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Kling, J., Ludwig, J. and Katz, L. (2005). ‘Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 120(1), pp. 87130.
  • Kling, J., Liebman, J. and Katz, L. (2007). ‘Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects’, Econometrica, vol. 75(1), pp. 83119.
  • Lavy, V. and Schlosser, A. (2011). ‘Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 3(2), pp. 133.
  • Lavy, V., Paserman, D. and Schlosser, A. (2012a). ‘Inside the black box of ability peer effects: evidence from variation in low achievers in the classroom’, Economic Journal, vol. 122(559), pp. 20837.
  • Lavy, V., Silva, O. and Weinhardt, F. (2012b). ‘The good, the bad and the average: evidence on ability peer effects in schools’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 30(2), pp. 367414.
  • Ludwig, J., Duncan, G., Gennetian, L., Katz, L., Kessler, R., Kling, J. and Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012). ‘Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults’, Science, vol. 21(337), No. 6101, pp. 150510.
  • Lupton, R., Tunstall, R., Sigle-Rushton, W., Obolenskaya, P., Sabates, R., Meschi, E., Kneale, D. and Salter, E. (2009). ‘Growing up in Social Housing in Britain, Report, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Manski, C. (1993). ‘Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 60(3), pp. 53142.
  • Manski, C. (2000). ‘Economic analysis of social interactions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14(3), pp. 11536.
  • Moffitt, R. (2001). ‘Policy interventions, low-level equilibria, and social interactions’, in (S. Durlauf and P. Young, eds.), Social Dynamics, pp. 4582, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Moretti, E. (2004). ‘Estimating the social return to higher education: evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 121(1–2), pp. 175212.
  • Oreopolous, P. (2003). ‘The long-run consequences of living in a poor neighborhood’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 118(4), pp. 153375.
  • Rosenbaum, J. (1995). ‘Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: lessons from the Gautreaux Program’, Housing Policy Debate, vol. 6(1), pp. 23169.
  • Sanbonmatsu, L., Kling, J., Duncan, G. and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2006). ‘Neighborhoods and academic achievement: results from the moving to opportunity experiment’, Journal of Human Resources, vol. 41(4), pp. 64991.
  • Weinhardt, F. (2013). ‘Neighbourhood quality and student performance’, IZA Discussion Paper 7139.