SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abadie, A. and Imbens, G.W. (2011). ‘Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects’, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 29(1), pp. 111.
  • Adams, R.B. and Ferreira, D. (2009). ‘Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 94(2), pp. 291309.
  • Adams, S.M., Gupta, A., Haughton, D.M. and Leeth, J.D. (2007). ‘Gender differences in CEO compensation: evidence from the USA’, Women in Management Review, vol. 22(3), pp. 20824.
  • Ahern, K.R. and Dittmar, A.K. (2012). ‘The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 127(1), pp. 13797.
  • Albrecht, J., Bjorklund, A. and Vroman, S. (2003). ‘Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden?’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 21(1), pp. 14577.
  • Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991). ‘Some tests of specification for panal data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 58(2), pp. 27798.
  • Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995). ‘Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 68(1), pp. 2951.
  • Arrow, K. (1972). ‘Models of job discrimination’, in (A. Pascal, ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life, Lexington, KY: D.C. Heath.
  • Babcock, L. and Laschever, S. (2003). Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bebchuk, L.A., Coates, J.C. and Subramanian, G. (2002). ‘The powerful antitakeover force of staggered boards: theory, evidence, and policy’, Stanford Law Review, vol. 54(3), pp. 887951.
  • Becker, G.S. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Blackaby, D., Booth, A.L. and Frank, J. (2005). ‘Outside offers and the gender pay gap’, Economic Journal, vol. 115(501), pp. 81107.
  • Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998). ‘Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 87(1), pp. 11543.
  • Booth, A.L. (2009). ‘Gender and competition’, Labour Economics, vol. 16(6), pp. 599606.
  • Bygren, M. and Ghler, M. (2012). ‘Family formation and men's and women's attainment of workplace authority’, Social Forces, vol. 90(3), pp. 795816.
  • Cadbury, A. (1992). ‘The financial aspects of corporate governance, report on the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance’, GEE, London.
  • Conyon, M. and Murphy, K. (2000). ‘The prince and the pauper? CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, vol. 110(467), pp. 64071.
  • Conyon, M.J. (2011). ‘Compensation committees and CEO pay’, in (C.A. Malin, ed.), Handbook on International Corporate Governance: Country Analyses, pp. 297316, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Conyon, M.J., Fernandez, N., Ferreira, M.A., Matos, P. and Murphy, K.(2010). ‘The executive compensation controversy: a transatlantic analysis’, Cornell University, available at http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ics/5 (last accessed 1 November 2013).
  • Davies, E. (2011). Women on Boards an Independent Review into Women on Boards, London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills BIS.
  • Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. (1985). ‘The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93(6), pp. 115577.
  • Dezso, C.L. and Gaddis Ross, D. (2012). ‘Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel investigation’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33(9), pp. 107289.
  • Doldor, E., Vinnicombe, S., Gaughan, M. and Sealy, R. (2012). ‘Gender diversity on boards: the appointment process and the role of executive search firms’, Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series, Manchester.
  • Doyle, A.C. (1892). ‘The adventure of silver blaze’, The Strand Magazine, (December).
  • E&HRC (2007). ‘Sex and power’, Equalty and Human Rights Commission, Manchester.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M., Kahwajy, J.L. and Bourgeouis, L.J. (1997). ‘Conflict and strategic choice: how top management teams disagree’, California Management Review, vol. 39(2), pp. 4262.
  • Elstad, B. and Ladegard, G. (2012). ‘Women on corporate boards: key influencers or tokens?’, Journal of Management & Governance, vol. 16(4), pp. 595615.
  • Erhardt, N.L., Werbel, J.D. and Shrader, C.B. (2003). ‘Board of director diversity and firm financial performance’, Corporate Governance, vol. 11(2), pp. 10211.
  • European Union (2012). ‘Women in economic decision-making in the EU: progress report. A Europe 2020 initiative’, Commission Staff Working Document, Luxembourg.
  • Farrell, K.A. and Hersch, P.L. (2005). ‘Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender’, Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 11(1/2), pp. 85106.
  • FRC (2012). ‘The UK corporate governance code’, Financial Reporting Council, London.
  • Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. and Boeker, W. (1994). ‘The effect of board size and diversity on strategic change’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15(3), pp. 24150.
  • Greenbury, R. (1995). ‘Directors remuneration: report of a study group chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury’, Confederation of British Industry, London.
  • Gregory, A., Jeanes, E., Tharyan, R. and Tonks, I. (2013). ‘Does the stock market gender stereotype corporate boards? Evidence from the markets reaction to directors trades’, British Journal of Management, vol. 24(2), pp. 17490.
  • Gregory-Smith, I. (2012). ‘Chief executive pay and remuneration committee independence’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 74(4), pp. 51031.
  • Gregory-Smith, I. and Main, B.G.M. (2013). ‘Heads I win, tails you lose. A career analysis of executive pay and corporate performance’, Working Paper. University of Edinburgh, available at, http://www.homepages.ed.ac.uk/mainbg/images/Heads%20I%20win_Dec_2012.pdf (last accessed 18 November 2013).
  • Hallock, K.F. and Bertrand, M. (2001). ‘The gender gap in top corporate jobs’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 55(1), pp. 321.
  • Hampel, S.R. (1998). ‘Committee on corporate governance’, GEE, London.
  • Heckman, J.J. (1979). ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica, vol. 47(1), pp. 15361.
  • Hillman, A.J., Cannella, A.A. and Paetzold, R.L. (2000). ‘The resource dependence role of corporate directros: strategic adaption of board composition in response to environmnetal change’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 37(2), pp. 23555.
  • Huang, J. and Kisgen, D.J. (2012). ‘Gender and corporate finance: are male executives overconfident relative to female executives?’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 108(3), pp. 82239.
  • Joy, L., Carter, N.M., Wagener, H.M. and Narayanan, S. (2007). ‘The bottom line: Corporate performance and women's representation on boards’, Catalyst.
  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H. (1991). ‘The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5(1), pp. 193206.
  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk’, Econometrica,vol. 47(4), pp. 26291.
  • Kanter, R.M. (1997). Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic Books.
  • Larcker, D.F., Richardson, S.A. and Tuna, A.I. (2007). ‘Corporate governance, accounting outcomes and organizational performance’, Accounting Review, vol. 82(4), pp. 9631008.
  • Lau, D.C. and Murnighan, K.T. (1998). ‘Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23(2), pp. 32540.
  • Lazear, E.P. and Rosen, S. (1990). ‘Male-female wage differentials in job ladders’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 8(1), pp. 10623.
  • Levi, M., Li, K. and Zhang, F. (2011). ‘Men are from mars, women are from venus: gender and mergers and acquisitions’, Sauder School of Business Working Paper, University of British Columbia.
  • Luckerath-Rovers, M. (2009). ‘Female directors on corporate boards provide legitimacy to a company: a resource dependency perspective’, Management Online Review, (June), pp. 113, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411693 (last accessed: 18 November 2013).
  • Main, B.G.M. (2006). ‘The ABI guidelines for share-option based incentive schemes. Setting the hurdle too high?’, Accounting and Business Research, vol. 36(3), pp. 191205.
  • Main, B.G.M., Jackson, C., Pymn, J. and Wright, V. (2008). ‘The remuneration committee and strategic human resource management’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 16(3), pp. 22538.
  • Manning, A. (2003). Monopsony in Motion, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Marschke, R., Laursen, S., Nielsen, J.M. and Rankin, P. (2007). ‘Demographic intertia revisited: an immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education, vol. 78(1), pp. 126.
  • Marshall, A. (1927). Industry and Trade, London: Macmillan.
  • Mayer, C. (2013). Firm Commitment. Why the Corporation is Failing us and how to Restore Trust in it, London: Oxford University Press.
  • McKinsey & Co. (2007). ‘Women matter. Gender diversity, a corporate performance driver’, McKinsey & Company.
  • McKinsey & Co. (2008). ‘Women matter. Female leadership, a competitive edge for the future’, McKinsey & Company.
  • McKinsey & Co. (2010). ‘Women matter. Women at the top of corporations, making it happen’, McKinsey & Company.
  • Miller, T. and del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). ‘Demographic diversity in the board room: mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 46(5), pp. 75586.
  • Milliken, F.J. and Martins, L.L. (1996). ‘Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 21(2), pp. 40233.
  • Mincer, J. and Polachek, S. (1974). ‘Family investment in human capital: earnings of women’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82(2), pp. S76108.
  • MM & K Ltd (2007). ‘The executive director total remuneration survey’, in Association with Manifest Information Services Ltd.
  • Nielsen, S. and Huse, M. (2010). ‘The contribution of women on boards of directors: going beyond the surface’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 18(2), pp. 13648.
  • O’Reilly, C.A. and Main, B.G.M. (2012). ‘Women in the boardroom: symbols or substance?’, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Palo Alto, California, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2039524 (last accessed: 18 November 2013).
  • Pau, S.L. and Sahni, H. (2009). ‘Women in top management and job self-selection’, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1444259 (last accessed: 18 November 2013).
  • Pepper, S. (2006). Senior Executive Reward: Key Models and Practices, Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.
  • Powell, G.N. and Butterfield, D. (1994). ‘Investigating the ‘glass ceiling’ phenomenon: an empirical study of actual promotions to top management’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37(1), pp. 6886.
  • Ransom, M.R. and Oaxaca, R.L. (2010). ‘New market power models and sex differences in pay’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 28(2), pp. 26789.
  • Robinson, G. and Dechant, K. (1997). ‘Building the business case for diversity’, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 11(3), pp. 2131.
  • Rohner, U. and Dougan, B. (2012). ‘Gender diversity and corporate performance’, Credit Suisse Research Institute, Zurich.
  • Smith, N., Smith, V. and Verner, M. (2006). ‘Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 55(7), pp. 56993.
  • Smith, N., Smith, V. and Verner, M. (2010). ‘Breaking through the glass ceiling? Gender differences in promotion patterns into CEO and VOCE-director positions in Danish companies’, Department of Economics, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark.
  • Storvik, A. and Teigen, M. (2010). ‘Women on board. The Norwegian experience’, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung International Policy Analysis, Berlin, Germany, available at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/07309.pdf (last accessed: 18 November 2013).
  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R. and Singh, V.2009). ‘Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 17(3), pp. 32037.
  • Torchia, M., Calabr, A. and Huse, M. (2011). ‘Women directors on corporate boards: from tokenism to critical mass’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 102(2), pp. 299317.
  • van der Walt, N. and Ingley, C. (2003). ‘Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors’, Corporate Governance, vol. 11(3), pp. 21834.
  • Westphal, J.D. (1999). ‘Collaboration in the boardroom: behavioural and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42(1), pp. 724.
  • Wilson, N. and Altanlar, A.R. (2009). ‘Director characteristics, gender balance and insolvency risk: an empirical study’, Leeds University Business School.
  • Windmeijer, F. (2005). ‘A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step gmm estimators’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 126(1), pp. 2551.
  • Zelechowski, D. and Bilimoria, D. (2004). ‘Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 12(3), pp. 33742.