Early Intervention in the Real World
Psychosis 101: evaluating a training programme for northern and remote youth mental health service providers
Version of Record online: 14 MAR 2013
© 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Volume 7, Issue 4, pages 442–450, November 2013
How to Cite
Cheng, C., deRuiter, W. K., Howlett, A., Hanson, M. D. and Dewa, C. S. (2013), Psychosis 101: evaluating a training programme for northern and remote youth mental health service providers. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 7: 442–450. doi: 10.1111/eip.12044
The Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health, Evaluation Doing Grant 1327.
The Foundation of the Canadian Psychiatric Association, Scotiabank Grant for Children and Mental Health.
- Issue online: 27 OCT 2013
- Version of Record online: 14 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 28 JUL 2012
- Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health
- Canadian Psychiatric Association
- continuing education;
- early psychosis intervention;
- remote learning;
- rural health service;
Most of the early psychosis intervention (EPI) training has focused on family physicians participants. In Northern Ontario, there is a shortage of primary care. This paper will present evaluation results of a pilot training programme for rural and remote youth mental health service providers.
A mixed methods approach was used. We evaluated a 2-day workshop about EPI for non-medical mental health workers delivered onsite and simultaneously by videoconferencing. There were 19 participants across four agencies. Seven were onsite and 12 were offsite. Participants’ knowledge was measured using a validated questionnaire at pre-intervention and at 3-, 6- and 9-month follow up. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate knowledge acquisition between the two modes of training. At 6 months, focus group interviews were conducted to explore their experiences of the mode of intervention delivery and evaluation. Emerging themes were iteratively derived through a series of discussions involving independent coders.
Only 15 complete datasets were available of the 19 original participants. Differences in knowledge acquisition between the two groups did not reach statistical difference. Six-month focus group data indicated that participants improved their relationship with EPI services and they were part of a strengthened network with other providers in the region. Post-intervention, the accuracy of referrals from participating agencies increased dramatically, with an increase in proportion of referrals who were eligible for EPI services. The follow-up process engaged participants in learning and re-engaged them with the material taught during the training session.
The results about developing service partnerships and relationship with specialist services are encouraging for policy and service decision-makers to address mental health service needs in northern and remote areas.