Get access

Changes in students' perceptions of their dental education environment

Authors

  • I. Kang,

    1. Faculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Search for more papers by this author
  • L. A. Foster Page,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    • Correspondence

      Lyndie A. Foster Page

      Department of Oral Rehabilitation

      Faculty of Dentistry

      Sir John Walsh Research Institute

      University of Otago

      PO Box 647

      Dunedin 9054, New Zealand

      Tel: 034795853

      Fax: 034795079

      e-mail: lyndie.fosterpage@otago.ac.nz

    Search for more papers by this author
  • V. R. Anderson,

    1. College of Education, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Search for more papers by this author
  • W. M. Thomson,

    1. Department of Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. M. Broadbent

    1. Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the ‘Expected’ and ‘Actual’ educational environment experienced by a cohort of Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students at the University of Otago's Faculty of Dentistry using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM).

Methods

Cohort members were asked to complete five DREEM surveys over the four-year BDS programme. Student expectations at the beginning of their first year were assessed using a modified version of the DREEM questionnaire, while following (standard) DREEM questionnaires at the end of each professional year addressed students' ‘Actual’ perception of the educational environment.

Results

Sixty-six students (99%) completed at least one questionnaire. Overall, the BDS students' perceptions of their educational environment tended to be positive and students identified both perceived strengths and weaknesses in the BDS programme. However, more negative than positive shifts were reported between the ‘Expected’ and ‘Actual’ individual DREEM individual items, suggesting that BDS students initially expected more from their educational environment than they actually experienced. Individual DREEM outcomes undergoing negative and positive shifts differed over the years and varied in number. These may be explained, in part, by changes in the curriculum focus from year to year.

Conclusion

The students' changing DREEM responses over time revealed anticipated and perceived strengths and weaknesses of the BDS curriculum, as well as shifts in students' perceptions in response to curricular changes. However, our findings highlight the potential usefulness for dental education of a measure for use that takes the unique aspects of the dental education environment into account.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary