Get access

Mechanism of bilateral communication in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Authors

  • Stephan Michel,

    Corresponding author
    • Laboratory for Neurophysiology, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Roger Marek,

    1. The Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Henk T. vanderLeest,

    1. Laboratory for Neurophysiology, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mariska J. vanSteensel,

    1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • William J. Schwartz,

    1. Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Christopher S. Colwell,

    1. Laboratory for Neurophysiology, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
    2. Laboratory of Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Johanna H. Meijer

    1. Laboratory for Neurophysiology, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: Dr S. Michel, as above.

E-mail: S.Michel@lumc.nl

Abstract

The central circadian pacemaker of the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) is a bilaterally symmetrical structure. Little is known about the physiological mechanisms underlying communication between the left and right SCN and yet the degree of synchronization between SCN neurons can have a critical impact on the properties of the circadian system. In this study, we used electrophysiological tools and calcium (Ca2+) imaging to examine the mechanisms underlying bilateral signaling in mouse SCN. Electrical stimulation of one SCN produced responses in the contralateral SCN with a short delay (approximately 5 ms) and Ca2+-dependence that are consistent with action potential-mediated chemical synaptic transmission. Patch-clamp recordings of stimulated cells revealed excitatory postsynaptic inward-currents (EPSCs), which were sufficient in magnitude to elicit action potentials. Electrical stimulation evoked tetrodotoxin-dependent Ca2+ transients in about 30% of all contralateral SCN neurons recorded. The responding neurons were widely distributed within the SCN with a highest density in the posterior SCN. EPSCs and Ca2+ responses were significantly reduced after application of a glutamate receptor antagonist. Application of antagonists for receptors of other candidate transmitters inhibited the Ca2+ responses in some of the cells but overall the impact of these antagonists was variable. In a functional assay, electrical stimulation of the SCN produced phase shifts in the circadian rhythm in the frequency of multiunit activity rhythm in the contralateral SCN. These phase shifts were blocked by a glutamate receptor antagonist. Taken together, these results implicate glutamate as a transmitter required for communication between the left and right SCN.

Ancillary