Get access

Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

Authors


Abstract

We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary