SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agosta, S.J. & Klemens, J.A. (2008). Ecological fitting by phenotypically flexible genotypes: implications for species associations, community assembly and evolution. Ecol. Lett., 11, 11231134.
  • Ashton, I.W., Miller, A.E., Bowman, W.D. & Suding, K.N. (2010). Niche complementarity due to plasticity in resource use: plant partitioning of chemical N forms. Ecology, 91(3252–3260), 3.
  • Baker, H.G. & Baker, I. (1973). Amino acids in nectar and their evolutionary significance. Nature, 241, 543545.
  • Belisle, M., Peay, K.G. & Fukami, T. (2012). Flowers as islands: spatial distribution of nectar-inhabiting microfungi among plants of Mimulus aurantiacus, a hummingbird-pollinated shrub. Microb. Ecol., 63, 711718.
  • Best, R.J., Caulk, N.C. & Stachowicz, J.J. (2013). Trait vs. phylogenetic diversity as predictors of competition and community composition in herbivorous marine amphipods. Ecol. Lett., 16, 7280.
  • Bohannan, B.J.M. & Lenski, R.E. (2000). Linking genetic change to community evolution: insights from studies of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecol. Lett., 3, 362377.
  • Borody, T.J. & Khoruts, A. (2012). Fecal microbiota transplantation and emerging applications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 9, 8896.
  • Brown, W.L. Jr & Wilson, E.O. (1956). Character displacement. Syst. Zool., 5, 4964.
  • Bruno, J.F., Stachowicz, J.J. & Bertness, M.D. (2003). Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 119125.
  • Callaway, R.M. & Walker, L.R. (1997). Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology, 78, 19581965.
  • Chase, J.M. (2003). Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia, 136, 489498.
  • Chase, J.M. (2007). Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 104, 1743017434.
  • Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2003). Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Costello, E.K., Stagaman, K., Dethlefsen, L., Bohannan, B.J.M. & Relman, D.A. (2012). The application of ecological theory toward an understanding of the human microbiome. Science, 336, 12551262.
  • De Meester, L., Gomez, A., Okamura, B. & Schwenk, K. (2002). The Monopolization Hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecol., 23, 121135.
  • Drake, J.A. (1991). Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am. Nat., 137, 126.
  • Elton, C.S. (1927). Animal Ecology. Sidgewick and Jackson, London.
  • Fargione, J., Brown, C.S. & Tilman, D. (2003). Community assembly and invasion: an experimental test of neutral versus niche processes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 89168920.
  • Fox, B. (1987). Species assembly and the evolution of community structure. Evol. Ecol., 1, 201213.
  • Fukami, T. (2010). Community assembly dynamics in space. In: Community Ecology: Processes, Models, and Applications. (eds Verhoef, H.A., Morin, P.J.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 4554.
  • Fukami, T. & Morin, P.J. (2003). Productivity-biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly. Nature, 424, 423426.
  • Fukami, T., Bezemer, T.M., Mortimer, S.R. & van der Putten, W.H. (2005). Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecol. Lett., 8, 12831290.
  • Gause, G.F. (1932). Experimental studies on the struggle for existence: I. Mixed population of two species of yeast. J. Exp. Biol., 9, 389402.
  • Gilpin, M.E. & Case, T.J. (1976). Multiple domains of attraction in competition communities. Nature, 261, 4042.
  • Gleason, H.A. (1926). The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torry Bot. Club, 53, 726.
  • Goldberg, D.E. & Landa, K. (1991). Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J. Ecol., 79, 10131030.
  • Grinnell, J. (1917). The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. Auk, 34, 427433.
  • Grman, E. & Suding, K.N. (2010). Within-year soil legacies contribute to strong priority effects of exotics on native California grassland communities. Restor. Ecol., 18, 664670.
  • Herrera, C.M., Canto, A., Pozo, M.I. & Bazaga, P. (2010). Inhospitable sweetness: nectar filtering of pollinator-borne inocula leads to impoverished, phylogenetically clustered yeast communities. Proc. Biol. Sci., 277, 747754.
  • HilleRisLambers, J., Adler, P.B., Harpole, W.S., Levine, J.M. & Mayfield, M.M. (2012). Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 43, 227248.
  • Hoverman, J.T. & Relyea, R.A. (2008). Temporal environmental variation and phenotypic plasticity: a mechanism underlying priority effects. Oikos, 117, 2332.
  • Hubbell, S.P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol, 22, 41527.
  • Jackson, R. & Bartolome, J. (2002). A state-transition approach to understanding nonequilibrium plant community dynamics in Californian grasslands. Plant Ecol., 162, 4965.
  • Jiang, L., Tan, J. & Pu, Z. (2010). An experimental test of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis. Am. Nat., 175, 415423.
  • Kardol, P., Souza, L. & Classen, A.T. (2013). Resource availability mediates the importance of priority effects in plant community assembly and ecosystem function. Oikos, 122, 8494.
  • Knope, M.L., Forde, S.E. & Fukami, T. (2012). Evolutionary history, immigration history, and the extent of diversification in community assembly. Front. Microbiol., 2, 273.
  • Kraft, N.J.B., Valencia, R. & Ackerly, D.D. (2008). Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science, 322, 580582.
  • Lachance, M.-A., Starmer, W.T., Rosa, C.A., Bowles, J.M., Barker, J.S.F. & Janzen, D.H. (2001). Biogeography of the yeasts of ephemeral flowers and their insects. FEMS Yeast Res., 1, 18.
  • Lavorel, S. & Garnier, E. (2002). Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol., 16, 545556.
  • Leibold, M.A. (1995). The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology, 76, 13711382.
  • Lewontin, R.C. (1969). The meaning of stability. Brookhaven Symp. Biol., 22, 1324.
  • Losos, J.B. (2008). Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol. Lett., 11, 9951003.
  • MacArthur, R.H. (1972). Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • MacArthur, R.H. & Levins, R. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat., 101, 377385.
  • Martiny, A.C., Treseder, K. & Pusch, G. (2013). Phylogenetic conservatism of functional traits in microorganisms. ISME J., 7, 830838.
  • Mayfield, M.M. & Levine, J.M. (2010). Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecol. Lett., 13, 10851093.
  • Mouquet, N., Devictor, V., Meynard, C.N., Munoz, F., Bersier, L.-F., Chave, J. et al. (2012). Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives. Biol. Rev., 87, 769785.
  • Munguia, P., Osman, R., Hamilton, J., Whitlatch, R. & Zajac, R. (2010). Modeling of priority effects and species dominance in Long Island Sound benthic communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 413, 229240.
  • Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O'Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L. et al. (2012). vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-4. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
  • Peay, K.G., Belisle, M. & Fukami, T. (2012). Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities. Proc. Biol. Sci., 279, 749758.
  • Petraitis, P.S. (1989). The representation of niche breadth and overlap on Tilman's consumer-resource graphs. Oikos, 56, 289292.
  • Petraitis, P.S. (2013). Multiple Stable States in Natural Ecosystems, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Pianka, E.R. (1973). The structure of lizard communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4, 5374.
  • Porensky, L.M., Vaughn, K.J. & Young, T.P. (2012). Can initial intraspecific spatial aggregation increase multi-year coexistence by creating temporal priority? Ecol. Appl., 22, 92736.
  • Pozo, M.I., Herrera, C.M. & Bazaga, P. (2011). Species richness of yeast communities in floral nectar of southern Spanish plants. Microb. Ecol., 61, 8291.
  • Pozo, M.I., Lachance, M.-A. & Herrera, C.M. (2012). Nectar yeasts of two southern Spanish plants: the roles of immigration and physiological traits in community assembly. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 80, 281293.
  • R Development Core Team (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Reynolds, H.L. & Pacala, S.W. (1993). An analytical treatment of root-to-shoot ratio and plant competition for soil nutrient and light. Am. Nat., 141, 5170.
  • Scheffer, M., Szabo, S., Gragnani, A., van Nes, E.H., Rinaldi, S., Kautsky, N. et al. (2003). Floating plant dominance as a stable state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 100, 40404045.
  • Shorrocks, B. & Bingley, M. (1994). Priority effects and species coexistence: experiments with fungal-breeding Drosophila. J. Anim. Ecol., 63, 799806.
  • Silvertown, J., Dodd, M., Gowing, D., Lawson, C. & McConway, K. (2006). Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity. Ecology, 87, S39S49.
  • Sturz, A.V., Christie, B.R. & Nowak, J. (2000). Bacterial endophytes: potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 19, 130.
  • Suding, K.N., Lavorel, S., Chapin, F.S., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Diaz, S., Garnier, E. et al. (2008). Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Glob. Change Biol., 14, 11251140.
  • Tan, J., Pu, Z., Ryberg, W.A. & Jiang, L. (2012). Species phylogenetic relatedness, priority effects, and ecosystem functioning. Ecology, 93, 11641172.
  • Temperton, V.M. & Zirr, K. (2004). Order of arrival and availability of safe sites: an example of their importance for plant community assembly in stressed ecosystems. In: Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. (eds Temperton, V.M., Hobbs, R., Nuttle, T., Halle, S.). Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 285304.
  • Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tilman, D. (1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Vannette, R.L., Gauthier, M.-P.L. & Fukami, T. (2013). Nectar bacteria, but not yeast, weaken a plant-pollinator mutualism. Proc. Biol. Sci., 280, 20122601.
  • Verbruggen, E., van der Heijden, M.G.A., Rillig, M.C. & Kiers, E.T. (2013). Mycorrhizal fungal establishment in agricultural soils: factors determining inoculation success. New Phytol., 197, 11041109.
  • Wainwright, C.E., Wolkovich, E.M. & Cleland, E.E. (2012). Seasonal priority effects: implications for invasion and restoration in a semi-arid system. J. Appl. Ecol., 49, 234241.
  • Warren, P.H., Law, R. & Weatherby, A.J. (2003). Mapping the assembly of protist communities in microcosms. Ecology, 84, 10011011.
  • Weiher, E., Clarke, G.D.P. & Keddy, P.A. (1998). Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos, 81, 309322.
  • Werner, E.E. & Peacor, S.D. (2003). A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology, 84, 10831100.
  • Westoby, M., Walker, B. & Noy-Meir, I. (1989). Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J. Range Manag., 42, 266274.
  • Wilson, J.B. (1999). Assembly rules in plant communities. In: Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. (eds Weiher, E., Keddy, P.). Cambridge University, Press, pp. 130164.
  • Young, T.P. & Peffer, E. (2010). “Recalcitrant understory layers” revisited: arrested succession and the long life-spans of clonal mid-successional species. Can. J. For. Res., 40, 11841188.
  • Young, T.P., Chase, J.M. & Huddleston, R.T. (2001). Community succession and assembly comparing, contrasting and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecol. Restor., 19, 518.
  • Young, T.P., Petersen, D.A. & Clary, J.J. (2005). The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecol. Lett., 8, 662673.