Get access

Planting methods matter for cost-effective rainforest restoration

Authors

  • Noel D. Preece,

    1. Biome5 Pty Ltd, Atherton, Qld, Australia
    2. Tropical Environmental & Sustainability Science (TESS), School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia
    3. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Penny van Oosterzee,

    1. Tropical Environmental & Sustainability Science (TESS), School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia
    2. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
    3. Biocarbon Pty Ltd, Atherton, Qld, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michael J. Lawes

    1. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Summary

Forest restoration efforts in Australia's Wet Tropics establish <100 ha/year, compared with 20-year average clearing rates of 1661 ha/year. Establishment costs are serious impediments to restoration efforts. Costs range from $25,000 to $67,000/ha, compared with less than $5,000/ha in other areas using other methods. Some of this difference stems from methods used to plant trees. Augered holes are used commonly in environmental plantings, whereas planting spades are used mostly in forestry plantings. To determine the most cost-effective planting method between auger and spade planting methods, we compared the planting costs and the survival and growth of seedlings of local rainforest species, The speed of planting with a spade is on average four times quicker than with an auger, whereas the survival (range = 89–94%, spade vs auger respectively), and growth (slightly greater height growth for auger planted individuals) rates were only marginally different. Given these results, using planting spades is a cost-effective alternative to augering holes.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary