SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barrett J. (2004) Introducing the Murray-Darling Basin Native Fish Strategy and initial steps towards demonstration reaches. Ecological Management & Restoration 5, 1523.
  • Bartley Consulting Pty Ltd. (2010) Holland's Creek Demonstration Reach. Evaluation report for Goulburn-Broken Catchment Management Authority. Bartley Consulting Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Vic.
  • Baumgartner L. J. (2006) Population estimation methods to quantify temporal variation in fish accumulations downstream of a weir. Fisheries Management and Ecology 13, 355364.
  • Baumgartner L. J. and Boys C. (2012) Reducing the perversion of diversion: applying world standard fish screening practices to the Murray-Darling Basin. Ecological Management & Restoration 13, 135143.
  • Baumgartner L.J, Zampatti B., Jones M. et al. (2014) Fish Passage in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia: Not just an upstream battle. Ecological Management and Restoration (in press).
  • Berguis A. (2013) Technical Assessment of the Loudoun Weir Fishway Improvement Works. pp. 18. Aquatic Biopassage Services, Bundaburg, Qld. [Accessed 15th August 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.condaminealliance.com.au/project-final-reports-water.
  • Bond N. R. and Lake P. S. (2005) Ecological restoration and large-scale ecological disturbance: the effects of drought on the response by fish to a habitat restoration experiment. Restoration Ecology 13, 3948.
  • Boys C. A., Robinson W., Butcher A., Zampatti B. and Lyon J. (2009) Framework for developing and implementing ecological monitoring and evaluation of aquatic rehabilitation in demonstration reaches. MDBA Publication No. 43/08. Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. [Accessed 15 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/publications/framework-developing-and-implementing-ecological-monitoring-and-evaluation.
  • Boys C., Baumgartner L., Rampano B. et al. (2012a) Development of fish screening criteria for water diversions in the Murray-Darling Basin. Fisheries Final report series No. 134. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Cronulla. [Accessed 15 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/research/areas/fisheries-and-ecosystems/wild-fisheries/outputs/2012/2204.
  • Boys C. A., Rowland S. J., Gabor M. et al. (2012b) Emergence of epizootic ulcerative syndrome in native fish of the Murray-Darling River system, Australia: hosts, distribution and possible vectors. PLoS ONE 7, e35568.
  • Boys C. A., Robinson W., Baumgartner L. J., Rampano B. and Lowry M. (2013a) Influence of approach velocity and mesh size on the entrainment and contact of a lowland river fish assemblage at a screened irrigation pump. PLoS ONE 8, e67026.
  • Boys C. A., Southwell M., Thoms M. C. et al. (2013b) Evaluation of Aquatic Rehabilitation in the Bourke to Brewarrina Demonstration Reach, Barwon-Darling River, Australia. Fisheries Final report series No. 135, p. 141. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Port Stephens Fisheries Institute.
  • Brooks S. S. and Lake P. S. (2007) River restoration in Victoria, Australia: change is in the wind, and none too soon. Restoration Ecology 15, 584591.
  • Brooks A. P., Abbe T. B., Jansen J. D., Taylor M. and Gippel C. J.(2001) Putting the wood back into our rivers: an experiment in river rehabilitation proceedings: the value of healthy streams. In: Third Australian Stream Management Conference (eds I. Rutherfurd, F. Sheldon, G. Brierley and C. Kenyon) pp. 7380. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Brisbane, Qld.
  • Butcher A. and Norris A. (2010) Integrated Carp Removal in the Dewfish Demonstration Reach: A Report to the Condamine Alliance. June 2010. pp. 18. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Brisbane, Qld. [Accessed 15 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.condaminealliance.com.au/project-final-reports-water.
  • Downs P. W. and Kondolf G. M. (2002) Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29, 477496.
  • Hames F., Townsend A., Ringwood G. et al. (2014) Effective engagement of the Native Fish Strategy is delivered by coordinated and contextual effort. Ecological Management and Restoration (in press).
  • Hilderbrand R., Lemly A., Dolloff C. and Harpster K. (1997) Effects of large woody debris placement on stream channels and benthic macroinvertebrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54, 931939.
  • Inovact (2012) Murray Darling Basin Authority Native Fish Strategy, Demonstration Reach Concept: A Compendium of the River Demonstration Reaches. pp. 132. Inovact Consulting Ptd Ltd, Canberra, ACT.
  • Kail J. and Hering D. (2005) Using large wood to restore streams in Central Europe: potential use and likely effects. Landscape ecology 20, 755772.
  • Kail J., Hering D., Muhar S., Gerhard M. and Preis S. (2007) The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 11451155.
  • Koehn J. D. and Lintermans M. (2012) A strategy to rehabilitate fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin, south-eastern Australia. Endangered Species Research 16, 165181.
  • Lester R. and Boulton A. (2008) Rehabilitating agricultural streams in Australia with wood: a review. Environmental Management 42, 310326.
  • Lester R., Wright W. and Jones-Lennon M. (2007) Does adding wood to agricultural streams enhance biodiversity? An experimental approach. Marine and Freshwater Research 58, 687698.
  • Mallen-Cooper M. (1996) Fishways and Freshwater Fish Migration in South-Eastern Australia. University of Technology, Sydney, NSW.
  • MDBC (2004) Native Fish Strategy for the Murray-Darling Basin 2003–2013. Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council, Canberra, ACT. [Accessed 15 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/publications/native-fish-strategy-murray-Darling-basin-2003-2013.
  • Nicol S. J., Lieschke J. A., Lyon J. P. and Hughes V. (2005) Restoring structural woody habitat in the River Murray. In: Native Fish Habitat Rehabilitation and Management in the Murray-Darling Basin Workshop (eds M. Lintermans, P. Cottingham and R. O'Conner) pp. 5062. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Albury, NSW. February 2004.
  • Norris A., Hutchison M., Butcher A. et al. (2011) Dewfish Demonstration Reach Final Report. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Brisbane, Qld. [Accessed 15 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.condaminealliance.com.au/project-final-reports-water.
  • Norris A., Hutchison M. and Chilcott K. (2012a) Dewfish Demonstration Reach Monitoring and Evaluation Report, Autumn 2012. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Brisbane, Qld. [Accessed 15 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.condaminealliance.com.au/project-final-reports-water.
  • Norris A., Hutchison M. and Chilcott K. (2012b) Dewfish Demonstration Reach Monitoring and Evaluation Report, Spring 2012. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Brisbane, Qld. [Accessed 15 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.condaminealliance.com.au/project-final-reports-water.
  • Palmer M. A., Bernhardt E. S., Allan J. D. et al. (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 208217.
  • Phillips B. (2002) Conceptual model to guide investments for restoring native fish in the Murray-Darling Basin. Report by the Expert Panel convened by the Murray-Darling Basin Commission. In: Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, ACT.
  • Pusey B. J. and Arthington A. H. (2003) Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 116.
  • Raymond S., Hames F., Lyon J. and Tennant W. (2013a) Hollands creek demonstration reach: Final report 2012/13. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Client Report. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Heidelberg, Vic.
  • Raymond S., Lyon J., Hames F. and Wilson A. (2013b) Ovens river demonstration reach: 2012/13. Final report. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Heidelberg, Vic.
  • Reich M., Kershner J. L. and Wildman R. C. (2003) Restoring streams with large wood: a synthesis. In: The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. pp. 355366. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Roni P., Hanson K., Beechie T. et al. (2005) Habitat rehabilitation for inland fisheries. Global review of effectiveness and guidance for rehabilitation of freshwater ecosystems. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 484. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Rutherfurd I., Ladson A. R. and Stewardson M. J. (2004) Evaluating stream rehabilitation projects: reasons not to, and approaches if you have to. Australian Journal of Water Resources 8, 57.
  • Southwell M. R., Thoms M. C. and Boys C. A. (2009) The potential effect of re-snagging on hydraulic habitat. International Association of Hydrological Sciences 328, 103111.
  • Spanhoff B., Riss W., Jakel P., Dakkak N. and Meyer E. I. (2006) Effects of an experimental enrichment of instream habitat heterogeneity on the stream bed morphology and chironomid community of a straightened section in a sandy lowland stream. Environmental Management 37, 247257.