SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Andrade CAC, Vieira RD, Ananina G, Klaczko LB (2009) Evolution of the male genitalia: morphological variation of the aedeagi in a natural population of Drosophila mediopunctata. Genetica 135, 1323.
  • Arnold SJ (1994) Is there a unifying concept of sexual selection that applies to both plants and animals? American Naturalist 144, S1S12.
  • Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38, 709719.
  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2002) Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56, 936947.
  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Arnqvist G, Thornhill R (1998) Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genetical Research 71, 193212.
  • Arora GL, Bhatnagar RDS (1961) Some observations on the habits and behaviour of Labirura riparia (Pallas); (Dermaptera: Labiduridae). Entomologist 94, 212217.
  • Ashford RW (1970) Observations on the biology of Hemimems talpoides (Insecta: Dermaptera). Journal of Zoology 162, 143148.
  • Bateson W, Brindley HH (1892) On some cases of variation in secondary sexual characters, statistically examined. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 40, 585594.
  • Baijal HN, Srivastava GK (1974) Notes on the biology of Euborellia plebeja (Dohrn). Indian Journal of Entomology 36, 2327.
  • Bertin A, Fairbairn DJ (2007) The form of sexual selection on male genitalia cannot be inferred from within-population variance and allometry. A case study in Aquarius remigis. Evolution 61, 825837.
  • Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Quarterly Review of Biology 75, 385407.
  • Bonduriansky R (2007) Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61, 838849.
  • Bonduriansky R, Day T (2003) The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits. Evolution 57, 24502458.
  • Briceño RD (1997) Genitalic structure and copulation in Paralabella dorsalis (Dermaptera: Labbidae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 45, 11071116.
  • Briceño RD, Eberhard WG (1995) The functional morphology of male cerci and associated characters in 13 species of tropical earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae, Labiidae, Carcinophoridae, Pygidicranidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 555, 163.
  • Briceño RD, Schunch W (1988) Reproductive biology and behavior of Doru taeniatum (Forficulidae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 36, 437440.
  • Brindle A (1984) The Esphalmeninae (Dermaptera: Pygidicranidae): a group of Andean and South African earwigs. Systematic Entomology 9, 281292.
  • Brink P (1956a) Reproductive system and mating in Plecoptera I. Opsucula Entomologica 21, 5796.
  • Brink P (1956b) Reproductive system and mating in Plecoptera II. Opsucula Entomologica 21, 97128.
  • Burr M (1915a) On the male genital armature of the Dermaptera Part 1: protodermaptera (except Psalidae). Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 1915, 413447.
  • Burr M (1915b) On the male genital armature of the Dermaptera Part 2: psalidae. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 1915, 521546.
  • Burr M (1916) On the male genital armature of the Dermaptera Part 3: eudermaptera. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 1916, 118.
  • Burr M, Jordan K (1913) On Arixenina Burr, a suborder of Dermaptera. The Transactions of the second Entomological Congress (Oxford, 1912) 2, 398421.
  • Colgan DJ, Cassis G, Beacham E (2003) Setting the molecular phylogenetic framework for the Dermaptera. Insect Systematics & Evolution 34, 6579.
  • Cooper LP (1992) Control of black field earwig, Nala lividipes (Dufour), in beetroot seedlings. Plant Protection Quarterly 7, 112113.
  • Cordero A, Santolamazza-Carbone S, Utzeri C (1995) Male disturbance, repeated insemination and sperm competition in the damselfly Coenagrion scitulum (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Animal Behaviour 47, 437449.
  • Cordero C, Eberhard WG (2003) Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16, 16.
  • Costa JT (2006) The Other Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland.
  • Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, London.
  • Dobler R, Kölliker M (2010) Kin-selected siblicide and cannibalism in the European earwig. Behavioral Ecology 21, 257263.
  • Dufour L (1844) Anatomie générale des Diptères. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 1, 244264.
  • Eberhard W, Rodriguez RL, Polihronakis M (2009) Pitfalls in understanding the functional significance of genital allometry. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, 435445.
  • Eberhard WG (1985) Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Priceton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Eberhard WG (2009) Static allometry and animal genitalia. Evolution 63, 4866.
  • Eberhard WG (2010) Rapid divergent evolution of genitalia: theory and data updated. In: Leonard JL , Córdoba-Aguilar A (eds) The Evolution of Primary Sexual Characters in Animals, pp 4078. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Eberhard WG, Gutiérrez EE (1991) Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45, 1828.
  • Eberhard WG, Huber BA, Rodriguez RL, Briceño RD, Salas I, Rodriguez V (1998) One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52, 415431.
  • Emlen DJ, Nijhout HF (2000) The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 661708.
  • Fisher RA (1958) The General Theory of Natural Selection. Dover, New York.
  • Forslund P (2000) Male–male competition and large size mating advantage in European earwigs, Forficula auricularia. Animal Behaviour 59, 753762.
  • Forslund P (2003) An experimental investigation into status-dependent male dimorphism in the European earwig, Forficula auricularia. Animal Behaviour 65, 309316.
  • Ghent AW (1998) Spurious replication in analysis: making 2 × 2 tables out of paired data. American Midland Naturalist 139, 391393.
  • Green AJ (1992) Positive allometry is likely with mate choice, competitive display and other functions. Animal Behaviour 43, 170172.
  • Green AJ (1999) Allometry of genitalia in insects and spiders: one size does not fit all. Evolution 53, 16211624.
  • Grimaldi D, Engel MS (2005) Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
  • Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 9298.
  • Guillet S, Deunff J (2000) Isolation and characterization of four polymorphic microsatellite loci in Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae). Molecular Ecology 9, 16611686.
  • Guillet S, Guiller A, Deunff J, Vancassel M (2000) Analysis of a contact zone in the Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) species complex in the Pyrenean Mountains. Heredity 85, 444449.
  • Günther K, Herter K (1974) Ordnung Dermaptera (Ohrwürmer). In: Helmcke J-G , Starck D , Wermuth H (eds) Kükenthal's Handbuch Der Zoologie, 2nd edn, Vol. 4, pt 2, pp 1158. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.
  • Haas F (1995) The phylogeny of the Forficulina, a suborder of the Dermaptera. Systematic Entomology 20, 8598.
  • Haas F, Hwen JTC, Tang HB (2012) New evidence on the mechanics of wing unfolding in Dermaptera. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 70, 95105.
  • Haas F, Klass KD (2003) The basal phylogenetic relationships in the Dermaptera. Klass KD (ed.) Proceedings of the First Dresden Meeting on Insect Phylogeny: Phylogenetic Relationships within the Insect Orders, Dresden, September 19–21, 2003. Entomologische Abhandlungen 61: 138142.
  • Haas F, Kukalová-Peck J (2001) Dermaptera hindwing structure and folding: new evidence for familial, ordinal and superordinal relationships within Neoptera (Insecta). European Journal of Entomology 98, 445509.
  • Hata H, Hori M (2012) Inheritance patterns of morphological laterality in mouth opening of zebrafish, Danio rerio. Laterality 17, 741754.
  • Hellriegel B, Ward PI (1998) Complex female reproductive tract morphology: its possible use in postcopulatory female choice. Journal of Theoretical Biology 190, 179186.
  • Herberstein ME, Schneider JM, Uhl G, Michalik P (2011) Sperm dynamics in spiders. Behavioral Ecology 22, 692695.
  • Higgins SL, Hosken DJ, Wedell N (2009) Phenotypic and genetic variation in male genitalia in the seedbug, Lygaeus equestris (Heteroptera). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 98, 400405.
  • Hincks WD (1955) A Systematic Monograph of the Dermaptera of the World. I. Pygidicranidae: Diplatyinae. British Museum (Natural History), London.
  • Hincks WD, Popham EJ (1970) Dermaptera. In: Tuxen SL (ed.) Taxonomist's Glossary of Genitalia in Insects, 2nd edn, pp 7580. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.
  • Hori M (1993) Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale-eating cichlid fish. Science 260, 216219.
  • Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2004) Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, 8793.
  • House CM, Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of male genitalia: patterns of genetic variation and covariation in the genital sclerites of the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 12811292.
  • Huber BA (2010) Mating positions and the evolution of asymmetric insect genitalia. Genetica 138, 1925.
  • Huber BA, Sinclair BJ, Schmitt M (2007) The evolution of asymmetric genitalia in spiders and insects. Biological Reviews 82, 647698.
  • Hudson L (1973) A systematic revision of the New Zealand Dermaptera. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 3, 219254.
  • Ishiwata K, Sasaki G, Ogawa J, Miyata T, Su Z-H (2011) Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein-coding gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58, 169180.
  • Jarvis KJ, Haas F, Whiting MF (2005) Phylogeny of earwigs (Insecta: Dermaptera) based on molecular and morphological evidence: reconsidering the classification of Dermaptera. Systematic Entomology 30, 442453.
  • Kamimura Y (2000) Possible removal of rival sperm by the elongated genitalia of the earwig, Euborellia plebeja. Zoological Science 17, 667672.
  • Kamimura Y (2003a) Effects of broken male intromittent organs on the sperm storage capacity of female earwigs, Euborellia plebeja. Journal of Ethology 21, 2935.
  • Kamimura Y (2003b) Effects of repeated mating and polyandry on the fecundity, fertility and maternal behaviour of female earwigs, Euborellia plebeja. Animal Behaviour 65, 205214.
  • Kamimura Y (2004a) Mating behaviour and insemination in Diplatys flavicollis, an earwig with double-barreled penises and a variable number of female sperm-storage organs. Journal of Zoology 262, 3746.
  • Kamimura Y (2004b) In search of the origin of twin penises: molecular phylogeny of earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulina) based on mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal RNA genes. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 903912.
  • Kamimura Y (2005) Last male paternity of Euborellia plebeja, an earwig with elongated genitalia and sperm removal behavior. Journal of Ethology 23, 3541.
  • Kamimura Y (2006) Right-handed penises of the earwig Labidura riparia (Insecta: Dermaptera: Labiduridae): evolutionary relationships between structural and behavioral asymmetries. Journal of Morphology 267, 13811389.
  • Kamimura Y (2007) Possible atavisms of genitalia in two species of earwigs (Dermaptera), Proreus simulans (Chelisochidae) and Euborellia plebeja (Anisolabididae). Arthropod Structure & Development 36, 361368.
  • Kamimura Y (2011) Population stochasticity, random determination of handedness, and the genetic basis of antisymmetry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 290, 7380.
  • Kamimura Y (2012) Correlated evolutionary changes in Drosophila female genitalia reduce the possible infection risk caused by male copulatory wounding. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66, 11071114.
  • Kamimura Y (2013) Promiscuity and elongated sperm storage organs work cooperatively as a cryptic female choice mechanism in an earwig. Animal Behaviour 85, 377383.
  • Kamimura Y, Iwase R (2010) Evolutionary genetics of genital size and lateral asymmetry in the earwig Euborellia plebeja (Dermaptera: Anisolabididae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101, 103112.
  • Kamimura Y, Matsuo Y (2001) A “spare” compensates for the risk of destruction of the elongated penis of earwigs (Insecta: Dermaptera). Die Naturwissenschaften 88, 468471.
  • Keller L, Reeve HK (1995) Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Advances in the Study of Behavior 24, 291315.
  • Kevan DKMcE, Vickery VR (1997) An annotated provisional list of non-Saltatorial orthopteroid insects of Micronesia, compiled mainly from the literature. Micronesia 30, 269353.
  • Kharboutli MS, Mack TP (1993) Comparison of three methods for sampling arthropod pests and their natural enemies in peanut fields. Journal of Economic Entomology 86, 18021810.
  • Kjer KM (2004) Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. Systematic Biology 53, 506514.
  • Klass KD (2001) The female abdomen of the viviparous earwig Hemimerus vosseleri (Insecta: Dermaptera: Hemimeridae), with a discussion of the postgenital abdomen of Insecta. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 131, 251307.
  • Klass KD (2003) The female genitalic region in basal earwigs (Insecta: Dermaptera: Pygidicranidae s.l.). Entomologische Abhandlungen 61, 173225.
  • Kočárek P (2009) A case of viviparity in a tropical non-parasitizing earwig (Dermaptera Spongiphoridae). Tropical Zoology 22, 237241.
  • Kölliker M (2007) Benefits and costs of earwig (Forficula auricularia) family life. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61, 14891497.
  • Kölliker M, Vancassel M (2007) Maternal attendance and the maintenance of family groups in common earwigs (Forficula auricularia): a field experiment. Ecological Entomology 32, 2427.
  • Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL (2001) The discrimination of alternative male morphologies. Behavioral Ecology 12, 553557.
  • Kuhl W (1928) Die Variabilität der abdominalen Körperanhänge von Forfiucla auricularia L. unter Berücksichtigung ihrer normalen und abnormen Entwicklung, nebst einem Anhang über die Geschlechtsbiologie. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 12, 299514.
  • Leamy L, Klingenberg CP (2005) The genetics and evolution of fluctuating asymmetry. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36, 121.
  • Linnaeus CV (1758) Systema Naturae, edition 10 (Holmiae).
  • Ludwig W (1970) Das Rechts-Links-Problem Im Tierreich Und Beim Menschen [Reprint of 1932 edition]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Lüpold S, McElligott AG, Hosken DJ (2004) Bat genitalia: allometry, variation and good genes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 83, 497507.
  • McPeek MA, Shen L, Farid H (2009) The correlated evolution of three-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies. Evolution 63, 7383.
  • Mariani R (1994) Contribucion al Estudio Anatomico de las Espermatecas en el Orden Dermaptera (Insecta). Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 53, 7982.
  • Mas F, Haynes KF, Kölliker M (2009) A chemical signal of offspring quality affects maternal care in a social insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 276, 28472853.
  • Mas F, Kölliker M (2011) Differential effects of ofspring condition-dependent signals on maternal care regulation in the European earwig. Behavioral Ecology and Scoiobiology 65, 341349.
  • Masly JP (2012) 170 years of “lock-and-key”: genital morphology and reproductive isolation. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ID 247352. doi: 10.1155/2012/247352.
  • Matzke D, Klass K-D (2005) Reproductive biology and nymphal development in the basal earwig Tagalina papua (Insecta: Dermaptera: Pygidicranidae), with a comparison of brood care in Dermaptera and Embioptera. Entomologische Abhandlungen 62, 99116.
  • Meunier J, Kölliker M (2012a) When it is costly to have a caring mother: food limitation erases the benefits of parental care in earwigs. Biology Letters 8, 547550.
  • Meunier J, Kölliker M (2012b) Parental antagonism and parent-offspring co-adaptation interact to shape family life. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 279, 39813988.
  • Meunier J, Wong JWY, Gómez Y et al. (2012) One clutch or two clutches? Fitness correlates of coexisting alternative female life-histories in the European earwig. Evolutionary Ecology 26, 669682.
  • Miller JS, Rudolph L, Zink AG (2011) Maternal nest defense reduces egg cannibalism by conspecific females in the maritime earwig Anisolabis maritima. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, 18731879.
  • Miller JS, Zink AG (2012) Parental care trade-offs and the role of filial cannibalism in the maritime earwig, Anisolabis maritima. Animal Behaviour 83, 13871394.
  • Misof B, Niehuis O, Bischoff I, Rickert A, Erpenbeck D, Staniczek A (2007) Towards an 18S phylogeny of hexapods: accounting for group-specific character covariance in optimized mixed nucleotide/doublet models. Zoology 110, 409429.
  • Moczek AP (2006) A matter of measurement: challenges and approaches in the comparative analysis of static allometries. American Naturalist 167, 606611.
  • Moore AJ, Wilson P (1993) The evolution of sexually dimorphic earwig forceps: social interactions among adults of the toothed earwig, Vostox apicedentatus. Behavioral Ecology 4, 4048.
  • Munoz NE, Zink AG (2012) Asymmetric forceps increase fighting success among males of similar size in the maritime earwig. Ethology 118, 943954.
  • Nakata S, Maa TC (1974) A review of the parasitic earwigs. Pacific Insects 16, 307374.
  • Palmer AR (1996) From symmetry to asymmetry: phylogenetic patterns of asymmetry variation in animals and their evolutionary significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 14 27914 286.
  • Palmer AR (2004) Symmetry breaking and the evolution of development. Science 306, 828833.
  • Palmer AR (2005) Antisymmetry. In: Hallgrímsson B , Hall BK (eds) Variation: A Central Concept in Biology, pp 359397. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
  • Palmer AR (2006) Caught right-handed. Nature 444, 689692.
  • Palmer AR (2009) Animal asymmetry. Current Biology 19, R473R477.
  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews 45, 525567.
  • Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 361, 235259.
  • Parker GA, Simmons LW (1996) Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 263, 315321.
  • Petrie M (1988) Intraspecific variation in structures that display competitive ability: large animals invest relatively more. Animal Behaviour 36, 11741179.
  • Petrie M (1992) Are all secondary sexual display structures positively allometric and, if so why? Animal Behaviour 43, 173175.
  • Polak M (2008) The developmental instability-sexual selection hypothesis: a general evaluation and case study. Evolutionary Biology 35, 208230.
  • Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y, Nee S (1991) The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45, 14221430.
  • Pomiankowski A, Møller AP (1995) A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 260, 2129.
  • Pomiankowski AN (1988) The evolution of female mate preference for male genetic quality. Oxford Surveys of Evolutionary Biology 5, 136184.
  • Popham EJ (1965) The functional morphology of the reproductive organs of the Common earwig (Forficula auricularia) and other Dermaptera with reference to the natural classification of the order. Journal of Zoology 146, 143.
  • Popham EJ (1985) The mutual affinities of the major earwig taxa (Insecta, Dermaptera). Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionforschung 23, 199214.
  • Popham EJ (2000) The geographical distribution of the Dermaptera (Insecta) with reference to continental drift. Journal of Natural History 34, 20072027.
  • Preziosi RF, Roff DA (1998) Evidence of genetic isolation between sexually monomorphic and sexually dimorphic traits in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Heredity 81, 9299.
  • Radesäter T, Halldórsdóttir H (1993a) Fluctuating asymmetry and forceps size in earwigs, Forficula auricularia. Animal Behaviour 45, 626628.
  • Radesäter T, Halldórsdóttir H (1993b) Two male types of the common earwig: male–male competition and mating success. Ethology 95, 8996.
  • Ramamurthi BN (1958) Studies on the male genital tube in the Dermaptera. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London A 33, 186190.
  • Rantala MJ, Roff DA, Rantala LM (2007) Forceps size and immune function in the earwig Forficula auricularia L. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90, 509516.
  • Renz DCF, Kevan DKMcE (1991) Dermaptera. In: CSIRO Division of Entomology (ed.) The Insects of Australia, 2nd edn, pp 360368. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  • Rönn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G (2007) Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 62176221.
  • Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent trait. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 263, 14151421.
  • Sakai S (1982) A new proposed classification of the Dermaptera with special reference to the check-list of the Dermaptera of the world. Bulletin of Daito Bunka University 20, 1108.
  • Sakai S (1985) Dermapterorum Catalogus XVI–XVIII: Iconographia I-III. Pygidicranidae and Diplatyidae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1987a) Dermapterorum Catalogus XIX–XX: Iconographia IV–V. Chelisochidae and Anisolabididae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1987b) Phylogenetic and evolutionary information on Dermaptera from the point of view of insect integrated taxonomy. In: Bacetti BM (ed.) Evolutionary Biology of Orthopteroid Insects, pp 496513. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.
  • Sakai S (1990) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXI–XXII: Iconographia VI–VII. Labiduridae and Apachyidae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1991) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXIII: Iconographia VIII. Spongiphoridae I. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1992) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXIV: Iconographia VIII. Spongiphoridae II. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1993) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXV: Iconographia IX. Spongiphoridae III. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1994) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXVI: Iconographia X. Forficulidae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1995a) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXVII: Iconographia XI. Forficulidae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1995b) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXVIII: Iconographia XII. Forficulidae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1995c) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXIX: Iconographia XIII. Forficulidae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Sakai S (1995d) Dermapterorum Catalogus XXX: Iconographia XIV. Forficulidae. Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.
  • Shimizu S, Machida R (2009) Eggs and their deposition and care of a primitive earwig Diplatys flavicollis (Shiraki) (Dermaptera: Diplatyidae). Proceedings of the Arthropodan Embryological Society of Japan 44, 2932.
  • Shimizu S, Machida R (2011a) Notes on mating and oviposition of a primitive representative of the higher Forficulina, Apachyus chartaceus (de Haan) (Insecta: Dermaptera: Apachyidae). Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 69, 7581.
  • Shimizu S, Machida R (2011b) Reproductive biology and postembryonic development in the basal earwig Diplatys flavicollis (Shiraki) (Insecta: Dermaptera: Diplatyidae). Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 69, 8397.
  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Simmons LW, House CM, Hunt J, Garcia-Gonzalez F (2009) Evolutionary response to sexual selection in male genital morphology. Current Biology 19, 14421446.
  • Simmons LW, Siva-Jothy MT (1998) Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In: Birkhead TR , Møller AP (eds) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, pp 341434. Academic Press, London.
  • Simmons LW, Tomkins JL (1996) Sexual selection and the allometry of earwig forceps. Evolutionary Ecology 10, 97104.
  • Simpson GB, Mayer DG (1990) Morphometric analysis of variation in Nala lividipes (Dufour) and Labidura truncata Kirby (Dermaptera: Labiduridae). Australian Journal of Entomology 29, 287294.
  • Singh SB, Khan TR, Singh KR (1982) Preliminary observations on the mating behaviour of Indian earwig, Labidura riparia (Pallas) (Dermaptera: Labiduridae). Biological Bulletin of India 4, 117118.
  • Siva-Jothy MT, Tsubaki Y (1989) Variation in copulation duration in Mnais pruinosa pruinosa Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae) 1. Alternative mate-securing tactics and sperm precedence. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24, 3945.
  • Snow LSE, Andrade MCB (2005) Multiple sperm storage organs facilitate female control of paternity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 272, 11391144.
  • Srivastava GK (1999) On the higher classification of Anisolabididae (Insecta: Dermaptera) with check-list of genera. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 97, 73100.
  • Staerkle M, Kölliker M (2008) Maternal food regurgitation to nymphs in earwigs (Forficula auricularia). Ethology 114, 844850.
  • Steinmann H (1986) Dermaptera. Catadermaptera I. Das Tierreich 102, 1343.
  • Steinmann H (1989a) Dermaptera. Catadermaptera II. Das Tierreich 105, 1504.
  • Steinmann H (1989b) World Catalogue of Dermaptera. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  • Steinmann H (1990) Dermaptera. Eudermaptera I. Das Tierreich 106, 1558.
  • Steinmann H (1993) Dermaptera. Eudermaptera II. Das Tierreich 108, 1711.
  • Styrsky JD, Van Rhein S (1999) Forceps size does not determine fighting success in European earwigs. Journal of Insect Behavior 12, 475482.
  • Suzuki S (2010) Progressive provisioning by the females of the earwig, Anisolabis maritima, increases survival rate of the young. Journal of Insect Science 10, 184 (available online: insectscience.org/10.184).
  • Suzuki S (2011) Provisioning mass by females of the maritime earwig, Anisolabis maritima, is not adjusted based on the number of young. Journal of Insect Science 11, 160 (available online: insectscience.org/11.160).
  • Suzuki S, Kitamura M, Matsubayashi K (2005) Matriphagy in the hump earwig, Anechura harmandi (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), increases the survival rates of the offspring. Journal of Ethology 23, 211213.
  • Swaddle JP (2003) Fluctuating asymmetry, animal behavior and evolution. Advances in the Study of Behavior 32, 169205.
  • Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist 122, 765788.
  • Tomkins JL (1999a) The ontogeny of asymmetry in earwig forceps. Evolution 53, 157163.
  • Tomkins JL (1999b) Environmental and genetic determinants of the male forceps length dimorphism in the European earwig. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47, 18.
  • Tomkins JL (2006) Major differences in minor allometries: a reply to Moczek. American Naturalist 167, 612618.
  • Tomkins JL, Brown GS (2004) Population density drives the local evolution of a threshold dimorphism. Nature 431, 10991103.
  • Tomkins JL, Hazel W (2007) The status of the conditional evolutionary stable strategy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 522528.
  • Tomkins JL, Kotiaho JS, LeBas NR (2005a) Phenotypic plasticity in the developmental integration of morphological trade-offs and secondary sexual trait compensation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 272, 543551.
  • Tomkins JL, Kotiaho JS, LeBas NR (2005b) Matters of scale: positive allometry and the evolution of male dimorphisms. American Naturalist 165, 389402.
  • Tomkins JL, Moczek AP (2009) Patterns of threshold evolution in polyphenic insects under different developmental models. Evolution 63, 459468.
  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (1995) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in earwig forceps: no evidence for reliable signalling. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 259, 8996.
  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (1996) Dimorphism and fluctuating asymmetry in the forceps of male earwigs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9, 753770.
  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (1998) Female choice and manipulations of forceps size and symmetry in the earwig, Forficula auricularia L. Animal Behaviour 56, 347356.
  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (1999) Heritability of size but not symmetry in a sexually selected trait chosen by female earwigs. Heredity 82, 151157.
  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (2002) Measuring relative investment: a case study of testes investment in species with alternative male reproductive tactics. Animal Behaviour 63, 10091016.
  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (2003) Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection: paradigms shifts, publication bias and observer expectation. In: Polak M (ed.) Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences, pp 262278. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Vahed K (2002) Coercive copulation in the alpine bushcricket Anonconotus alpinus Yersin (Tettigonidae: Tettigoniinae: Platycleidini). Ethology 108, 10651075.
  • van Lieshout E (2011) Male genital length and mating status differently affect mating behaviour in an earwig. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, 149156.
  • van Lieshout E, Elgar MA (2009) Armament under directional sexual selection does not exhibit positive allometry in an earwig. Behavioral Ecology 20, 258264.
  • van Lieshout E, Elgar MA (2011a) Longer exaggerated male genitalia confer defensive sperm-competitive benefits in an earwig. Evolutionary Ecology 25, 351362.
  • van Lieshout E, Elgar MA (2011b) Owner positional disadvantage in contests over mating prevents monopolization of females. Animal Behaviour 82, 753758.
  • van Lieshout E, van Wilgenburg E, Elgar MA (2009) No male agonistic experience effect on pre-copulatory mate choice in female earwigs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 17271733.
  • Van Valen L (1962) A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16, 125142.
  • Waage JK (1979) Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and sperm transfer. Science 203, 916918.
  • Wada T, Takegaki T, Mori T, Natsukari Y (2005) Sperm displacement behavior of the cuttlefish Sepia esculenta (Cephalopoda: Sepiidae). Journal of Ethology 23, 8592.
  • Walker KA, Fell RD (2001) Courtship roles of male and female European earwigs, Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), and sexual use of forceps. Journal of Insect Behavior 14, 117.
  • Ward PI (2000) Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). Evolution 54, 16801686.
  • Ward PI (2007) Postcopulatory selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.) and the mate-now-choose-later mechanism of cryptic female choice. Advances in the Study of Behavior 37, 343369.
  • Wiley RH, Poston J (1996) Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50, 13711381.
  • Wirth T, Le Guellec R, Vancassel M, Veuille M (1998) Molecular and reproductive characterization of sibling species in the European earwig (Forficula auricuaria). Evolution 52, 260265.
  • Wirth TR, Guellec L, Veuille M (1999) Directional substitution and evolution of nucleotide content in the cytochrome oxidase II gene in earwigs (dermapteran insects). Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 16451653.
  • Wong JWY, Kölliker M (2012) The effect of female condition on maternal care in the European earwig. Ethology 118, 450459.
  • Yasui Y (1997) A “good-sperm” model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females. American Naturalist 149, 573584.
  • Yoshizawa K (2011) Monophyletic Polyneoptera recovered by wing base structure. Systematic Entomology 36, 377394.
  • Yoshizawa K, Johnson KP (2005) Aligned 18S for Zoraptera (Insecta): phylogenetic position and molecular evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37, 572580.
  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection: a selection of a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53, 205244.