A multi-country comparison of reasons for dental non-attendance

Authors

  • Stefan Listl,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    2. Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max-Planck-Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany
    • Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

      E-mail: stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de

    Search for more papers by this author
  • John Moeller,

    1. Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Richard Manski

    1. Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non-attendance by Europeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life-history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 European countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non-attendance across different welfare-state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare-state regime, followed by the Eastern, the Bismarckian, and the Scandinavian welfare-state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non-attendance in all welfare-state regimes. The health system-level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and Bismarckian welfare-state regimes than in Scandinavia. This could be relevant information for health-care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.

Ancillary