SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 3(3), 411423.
  • Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M.W. (2010). Exploration-exploitation tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696717.
  • Arregle, J.L., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 7395.
  • Basco, R. & Perez-Rodriguez, M.J. (2009). Studying the family enterprise holistically. Family Business Review, 22(1), 8295.
  • Bentler, P.M. & Chou, C.P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16(1), 78117.
  • Berent-Braun, M.M. & Uhlaner, L.M. (2012). Family governance practices and teambuilding: Paradox of the enterprising family. Small Business Economics Journal, 38(1), 103119.
  • Block, J. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 248265.
  • Bollen, K.A. & Long, J.S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS, basic concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Camison-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcami, R., Segarra-Cipres, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331361.
  • Cassia, L., De Massis, A., & Pizzurno, E. (2012). Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(2), 198232.
  • Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693716.
  • Davis, J.A. & Tagiuri, R. (1989). The influence of life-stage on father-son work relationships in family companies. Family Business Review, 2(1), 4774.
  • De Massis, A., Chua, J., & Chrisman, J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21(2), 183199.
  • Distelberg, B. & Sorenson, R.L. (2009). Updating systems concepts in family businesses: A focus on values, resource flows and adaptability. Family Business Review, 22(1), 6581.
  • Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F., & Zellweger, T. (2010). Exploring the entrepreneurial behavior of family firms: Does the stewardship perspective explain differences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 347367.
  • Fong, C.T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 10161030.
  • Ford, J. & Backoff, R. (1988). Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation (pp. 81121). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 3950.
  • Garcia-Alvarez, E., Lopez-Sintas, J., & Gonzalvo, P.S. (2004). Socialization patterns of successors in first- to second-generation family business. Family Business Review, 15(3), 189203.
  • Gotsi, M., Andriopoulos, C., Lewis, M., & Ingram, A. (2010). Creative tensions: Managing tensions of multiple identities. Human Relations, 63(6), 781805.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hinkin, T.R. (2005). Scale development principles and practices. In R. Swanson & E. Holton III (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 161179). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Ingram, A., Lewis, M., Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. (2008). Innovation tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Toward a collective paradox frame. In Academy of Management Proceedings. Anaheim, CA: Academy of Management.
  • Irava, W. & Moores, K. (2010). Clarifying the strategic advantage of familiness: Unbundling its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 131144.
  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287302.
  • Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137159.
  • Kanter, R. (1998). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169207.
  • Lewis, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760776.
  • Martin, R. (2007). The opposable mind: How successful leaders win through integrative thinking. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R., & Cannella, A. (2007). Are family firm's superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829858.
  • Moores, K. & Barrett, M. (2002). Learning family business—Paradoxes and pathways. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.
  • Nordqvist, M. & Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3), 211239.
  • Norman, P., Palich, L., Livingstone, L., & Carinin, G. (2004). The role of paradoxical logic in innovation: The case of Intel. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15, 5171.
  • Pitts, M., Fowler, C., Kaplan, M., Nussbaum, J., & Becker, J. (2009). Dialectical tensions underpinning family succession planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(1), 5979.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879903.
  • Podsakoff, P.M. & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(2), 531544.
  • Poza, E.J. (2007). Family business. Mason, OH: Thomson South Western.
  • Rothenberg, A. (1979). Homospatial thinking in creativity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 1726.
  • Rubio, D.M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S., Lee, E.S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94104.
  • Schuman, S., Stutz, S., & Ward, J. (2010). Family business as paradox. New York: Palgrave.
  • Scott, S. & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580607.
  • Smith, W.K. & Lewis, M.W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381403.
  • Smith, W.K. & Tushman, M.L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522536.
  • Tapias, J. & Ward, J. (2008). Family values and value creation: The fostering of enduring values within family owned businesses. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ward, J.L. (2009). The ten hidden arts of successful business families. Family Business, 20(4), 4952.
  • Ward, T., Finke, R., & Smith, S. (1995). Creativity and the mind: Discovering the genius within. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Wright, D. (1982). The significance of paradoxical language in Hua-yen Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 32(3), 325338.
  • Zahra, S., Hayton, J., Neubaum, D., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 10351054.
  • Zellweger, T.M., Nason, R., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families. Family Business Review, 25(2), 136155.