SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Archer, S. N., Djamgoz, M. B. A., Loew, E. R., Partridge, J. C. & Vallerga, S. 1999: Adaptive Mechanisms in the Ecology of Vision. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 668.
  • Barreto, G. R. & Macdonald, D. W. 1999: The response of water voles, Arvicola terrestris, to the odours of predators. Anim. Behav. 57, 11071112.
  • Brose, U., Jonsson, T., Berlow, E. L., Warren, P., Banasek-Richter, C., Bersier, L.-F., Blanchard, J. L., Brey, T., Carpenter, S. R., Cattin Blandenier, M.-F., Cushing, L., Ali Dawah, H., Dell, T., Edwards, F., Harper-Smith, S., Jacob, U., Ledger, M. E., Martinez, N. D., Memmott, J., Mintenbeck, K., Pinnegar, J. K., Rall, B. C., Rayner, T. S., Reuman, D. C., Ruess, L., Ulrich, W., Williams, R. J., Woodward, G. & Cohen, J. E. 2006: Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 87, 24112417.
  • Brouwers, N. C. & Newton, A. C. 2009: Movement rates of woodland invertebrates: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2, 1022.
  • Brouwers, N. C. & Newton, A. C. 2010: Movement analyses of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 100, 623634.
  • Brouwers, N. C., Newton, A. C. & Bailey, S. 2011: The dispersal ability of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) in a wooded landscape. Eur. J. Entomol. 108, 117125.
  • Caro, T. 2005: Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals. Condo, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, p. 591.
  • Clemente, C. J., McMaster, K. A., Fox, E., Meldrum, L., Stewart, T. & York Main, B. 2010: The visual system of the Australian wolf spider Lycosa leuckartii (Araneae : Lycosidae): visual acuity and the functional role of the eyes. J. Arachnol. 38, 398406.
  • Creer, D. A. 2005: Correlations between ontogenetic change in color pattern and antipredator behavior in the racer, Coluber constrictor. Ethology 111, 287300.
  • Dangles, O., Pierre, D., Christides, J. P. & Casas, J. 2007: Escape performance decreases during ontogeny in wild crickets. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 31653170.
  • Dawkins, R. 1999: The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. The Bactra Review. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, USA, pp. 313.
  • Detzel, P. 1998: Die Heuschrecken Baden-Württembergs. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, p. 580.
  • Digel, C., Riede, J. O. & Brose, U. 2011: Body sizes, cumulative and allometric degree distributions across natural food webs. Oikos 120, 503509.
  • Foelix, R. F. 2011: Biology of Spiders. Museum, 3rd edn. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, USA, pp. 306.
  • Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Bates, D., Firth, D., Friendly, M., Gorjanc, G. O., Graves, S., Heiberger, R., Laboissiere, R., Monette, G., Nilsson, H., Ogle, D., Ripley, B., Zeileis, A. & R Development Core Team. 2012: car: Companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. R package version 2.0-12.
  • Gabbutt, P. D. 1959: The bionomics of the wood cricket, Nemobius sylvestris (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 1542.
  • Geiselhardt, S. F., Geiselhardt, S. & Peschke, K. 2009: Comparison of tarsal and cuticular chemistry in the leaf beetle Gastrophysa viridula (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and an evaluation of solid-phase microextraction and solvent extraction techniques. Chemoecology 19, 185193.
  • Goller, S. 2008: Chemical signals in arthropods – new structural motifs, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical Univ. Braunschweig, Germany.
  • Hänggi, A., Stöckli, E. & Nentwig, W. 1995: Habitats of Central European Spiders: Characterization of the Habitats of the Most Abundant Spider Species of Central Europe and Associated Species. Fauna Helvetica, Centre Suisse de Cartographie de la Faune, Neuchâtel, CH.
  • Hasson, O. 1991: Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predator. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 325329.
  • Hawlena, D., Strickland, M. S., Bradford, M. A. & Schmitz, O. J. 2012: Fear of predation slows plant-litter decomposition. Science 336, 14341438.
  • Hayward, M. W., Henschel, P., O'Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M., Balme, G. & Kerley, G. I. H. 2006: Prey preferences of the leopard (Panthera pardus). J. Zool. 270, 298313.
  • Helfman, G. S. 1989: Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish-trumpetfish interactions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24, 4758.
  • Hoefler, C. D., Durso, L. C. & McIntyre, K. D. 2012: Chemical-mediated predator avoidance in the European house cricket (Acheta domesticus) is modulated by predator diet. Ethology 118, 431437.
  • Ivins, B. L. & Smith, A. T. 1983: Responses of pikas (Ochotona princeps, Lagomorpha) to naturally occurring terrestrial predators. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13, 277285.
  • Jędrzejewski, W., Rychlik, L. & Jędrzejewska, B. 1993: Responses of bank voles to odours of seven species of predators: experimental data and their relevance to natural data and their experimental relationships. Oikos 68, 251257.
  • Jones, E. I. & Dornhaus, A. 2011: Predation risk makes bees reject rewarding flowers and reduce foraging activity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 15051511.
  • Kats, L. B. & Dill, L. M. 1998: The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5, 361394.
  • Kortet, R. & Hedrick, A. 2004: Detection of the spider predator, Hololena nedra by naïve juvenile field crickets (Gryllus integer) using indirect cues. Behaviour 141, 11891196.
  • Krala, K. & Poteserb, M. 2009: Relationship between body size and spatial vision in the Praying Mantis – an ontogenetic study. J. Orthoptera Res. 18, 153158.
  • Lenler-Eriksen, P. 1969: The hunting-web of the young spider Pisaura mirabilis. J. Zool. 157, 391398.
  • Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. 1990: Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619640.
  • Lizotte, R. S. & Rovner, J. S. 1988: Nocturnal capture of fireflies by lycosid spiders: visual versus vibratory stimuli. Anim. Behav. 36, 18091815.
  • MacNulty, D. R., Smith, D. W., Mech, L. D. & Eberly, L. E. 2009: Body size and predatory performance in wolves: is bigger better? J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 532539.
  • Marshall, S. D., Pavuk, D. M. & Rypstra, A. L. 2002: A comparative study of phenology and daily activity patterns in the wolf spiders Pardosa milvina and Hogna helluo in soybean agroecosystems in southwestern Ohio (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 30, 503510.
  • Martinou, A. F., Milonas, P. G. & Wright, D. J. 2009: Patch residence decisions made by Aphidius colemani in the presence of a facultative predator. Biol. Control 49, 234238.
  • Matsumoto, Y. & Mizunami, M. 2002: Lifetime olfactory memory in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 188, 295299.
  • Matsumoto, Y. & Mizunami, M. 2005: Formation of long-term olfactory memory in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Chem. Senses 20, i299i300.
  • Matsumoto, Y. & Mizunami, M. 2006: Olfactory memory capacity of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Biol. Lett. 2, 608610.
  • Miller, J. R. B., Ament, J. M. & Schmitz, O. J. 2013: Fear on the move: predator hunting mode predicts variation in prey mortality and plasticity in prey spatial response. J. Anim. Ecol., in press.
  • Morales, M. & R Development Core Team. 2012: sciplot: Scientific graphing functions for factorial designs. R package version 1.0-9, URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sciplot/index.html.
  • Mukherjee, S. & Heithaus, M. R. 2013: Dangerous prey and daring predators: a review. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 88, 550563.
  • Nordlund, D. A. & Morrison, R. K. 1990: Handling time, prey preference, and functional response for Chrysoperla rufilabris in the laboratory. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 57, 237242.
  • Persons, M. H. & Rypstra, A. L. 2001: Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 24932504.
  • Persons, M. H. & Uetz, G. W. 1997: The effect of prey movement on attack behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). J. Insect Behav. 10, 737752.
  • Persons, M. H., Walker, S. E., Rypstra, A. L. & Marshall, S. D. 2001: Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 61, 4351.
  • Persons, M. H., Walker, S. E. & Rypstra, A. L. 2002: Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav. Ecol. 13, 386392.
  • Petranka, J. W., Kats, L. B. & Sih, A. 1987: Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim. Behav. 35, 420425.
  • Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. & Sarkar, D. & R Development Core Team. 2012: nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-104, URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html.
  • Preisser, E. L. & Bolnick, D. I. 2008: The many faces of fear: comparing the pathways and impacts of nonconsumptive predator effects on prey populations. PLoS ONE 89, 24142415.
  • Preisser, E. L., Bolnick, D. I. & Benard, M. F. 2005: Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86, 501509.
  • Preisser, E. L., Orrock, J. L. & Schmitz, O. J. 2007: Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 88, 27442751.
  • Preisser, E. L., Bolnick, D. I. & Grabowski, J. H. 2009: Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey. Ecol. Lett. 12, 315323.
  • Provost, C., Lucas, É., Coderre, D. & Chouinard, G. 2006: Prey selection by the lady beetle Harmonia axyridis: the influence of prey mobility and prey species. J. Insect Behav. 19, 265277.
  • Pruitt, J. N., Stachowicz, J. J. & Sih, A. 2012: Behavioral types of predator and prey jointly determine prey survival: potential implications for the maintenance of within-species behavioral variation. Am. Nat. 179, 217227.
  • R Development Core Team. 2012: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org. [accessed 18 December 2012].
  • Radford, A. N. 2008: Age-related changes in nestling diet of the cooperatively breeding Green Woodhoopoe. Ethology 114, 907915.
  • Roberts, M. J. 1996: Collins Field Guide to the Spiders of Britain and Northern Europe. HarperCollins, London, UK.
  • Rypstra, A. L. & Buddle, C. M. 2013: Spider silk reduces insect herbivory. Biol. Lett. 9, 20120948.
  • Schmidt-Entling, M. H. & Siegenthaler, E. 2009: Herbivore release through cascading risk effects. Biol. Lett. 5, 773776.
  • Schmitz, O. J. 2008: Effects of predator hunting mode on grassland ecosystem function. Science 319, 952954.
  • Schmitz, O. J. & Suttle, K. B. 2001: Effects of top predator species on direct and indirect interactions in a food web. Ecology 82, 20722081.
  • Schmitz, O. J., Krivan, V. & Ovadia, O. 2004: Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett. 7, 153163.
  • Schmitz, O. J., Grabowski, J. H., Peckarsky, B. L., Preisser, E. L., Trussell, G. C. & Vonesh, J. R. 2008: From individuals to ecosystem function: toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosytem ecology. Ecology 89, 24362445.
  • Séquin, E. S., Jaeger, M. M., Brussard, P. F. & Barrett, R. H. 2003: Wariness of coyotes to camera traps relative to social status and territory boundaries. Can. J. Zool. 81, 20152025.
  • Stephens, D. W. & Krebs, J. R. 1986: Foraging Theory. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, p. 247.
  • Storm, J. J. & Lima, S. L. 2008: Predator-naïve fall field crickets respond to the chemical cues of wolf spiders. Can. J. Zool. 86, 12591263.
  • Storm, J. J. & Lima, S. L. 2010: Mothers forewarn offspring about predators: a transgenerational maternal effect on behavior. Am. Nat. 175, 382390.
  • Trabalon, M. & Bagnères, A.-G. 2010: Contact recognition pheromones in spiders and scorpions. In: Insect Hydrocarbons (Blomquist, G. J. & Bagnères, A. G., eds). Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, USA, pp. 344374.
  • Trussell, G. C., Ewanchuk, P. J. & Bertness, M. D. 2002: Field evidence of trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web. Ecol. Lett. 5, 241245.
  • Uetz, G. W. & Roberts, J. A. 2002: Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav. Evol. 59, 222230.
  • Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2002: Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  • Warren, P. H. & Lawton, J. H. 1987: Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? Oecologia 74, 231235.
  • Werner, E. E. & Anholt, B. R. 1993: Ecological consequences of the tradeoff between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am. Nat. 142, 242272.
  • Werner, E. E. & Peacor, S. D. 2003: A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84, 10831100.
  • Whitman, D. W. & Vincent, S. 2008: Large size as an antipredator defense in an insect. J. Orthoptera Res. 17, 353371.
  • Young, B. A. & Morain, M. 2002: The use of ground-borne vibrations for prey localization in the Saharan sand vipers (Cerastes). J. Exp. Biol. 205, 661665.