EXPERIMENTAL AND BASIC RESEARCH STUDIES
Scintigraphic comparison of intra-arterial injection and distal intravenous regional limb perfusion for administration of mesenchymal stem cells to the equine foot
Article first published online: 8 OCT 2013
© 2013 EVJ Ltd
Equine Veterinary Journal
Volume 46, Issue 4, pages 479–483, July 2014
How to Cite
Trela, J. M., Spriet, M., Padgett, K. A., Galuppo, L. D., Vaughan, B. and Vidal, M. A. (2014), Scintigraphic comparison of intra-arterial injection and distal intravenous regional limb perfusion for administration of mesenchymal stem cells to the equine foot. Equine Veterinary Journal, 46: 479–483. doi: 10.1111/evj.12137
- Issue published online: 9 JUN 2014
- Article first published online: 8 OCT 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 9 JUL 2013 03:40AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 28 JAN 2013
- mesenchymal stem cells;
- regional limb perfusion;
- hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime;
Reasons for performing study
Intra-arterial (i.a.) and intravenous (i.v.) regional limb perfusions (RLP) through the median artery and cephalic vein, respectively, have been previously investigated for administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to the equine distal limb. Limitations due to thrombosis of the arteries after i.a. RLP and poor distribution of MSCs to the foot with i.v. RLP were observed. These techniques need to be modified for clinical use.
Evaluate the distribution, uptake and persistence of radiolabelled MSCs after i.a. injection through the median artery without a tourniquet and after i.v. RLP through the lateral palmar digital vein.
In vivo experimental study.
99mTc-HMPAO-labelled MSCs were injected through the median artery of one limb and the lateral palmar digital vein of the other limb of 6 horses under general anaesthesia. No tourniquet was used for the i.a. injection. A pneumatic tourniquet was placed on the metacarpus for i.v. injection. Scintigraphic images were obtained up to 24 h after injection.
Intra-arterial injection resulted in MSCs retention within the limb despite the absence of a tourniquet and no thrombosis was observed. Both i.a. injection and i.v. RLP led to distribution of MSCs to the foot. The i.a. injection resulted in a more homogeneous distribution. The MSC uptake was higher with i.v. RLP at the initial timepoints, but no significant difference was present at 24 h.
Both i.a. injection through the median artery without a tourniquet and i.v. RLP performed through the lateral palmar digital vein under general anaesthesia are safe and reliable methods for administration of MSCs to the equine foot. The i.a. technique is preferred owing to the better distribution, but is technically more challenging. The feasibility of performing these techniques on standing horses remains to be investigated.