PUPARIATION SITE PREFERENCE WITHIN AND BETWEEN DROSOPHILA SIBLING SPECIES
Version of Record online: 22 MAY 2013
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 67, Issue 9, pages 2714–2727, September 2013
How to Cite
Erezyilmaz, D. F. and Stern, D. L. (2013), PUPARIATION SITE PREFERENCE WITHIN AND BETWEEN DROSOPHILA SIBLING SPECIES. Evolution, 67: 2714–2727. doi: 10.1111/evo.12146
- Issue online: 3 SEP 2013
- Version of Record online: 22 MAY 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 26 APR 2013 04:14PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 APR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 1 JUL 2012
- NIH. Grant Number: F32 GM083546-02
- National Institutes of Health. Grant Number: P50 GM071508
Disclaimer: Supplementary materials have been peer-reviewed but not copyedited.
Figure S1. We created custom Agilent high-density–CGH array (8 × 15K) e-array including 6975 pairs of probes (Agilent part number G4427A, Amadid #022089) Drosophila sechellia genomic regions are shaded, Drosophila simulans regions are clear.
Figure S2. Plot of interactions between loci.
Figure S3. Interactions between QTL-II and sex, and QTL-II and QTL-X for the Drosophila sechellia back-cross (A,C), and the Drosophila simulans back-cross (B,D).
Figure S4. Whole genome effect plots for (A) the Drosophila sechellia backcross, (B) the Drosophila simulans backcross, and (C) the F2 intercross.
Appendix S1. The sequence of 384 bar-coded adapters.
Appendix S2. The identity, stock number, and collection site of fly strains used in this study.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.