THE CONTRIBUTION OF MATERNAL EFFECTS TO SELECTION RESPONSE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF COMPETING MODELS
Version of Record online: 30 SEP 2013
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 68, Issue 2, pages 549–558, February 2014
How to Cite
McGlothlin, J. W. and Galloway, L. F. (2014), THE CONTRIBUTION OF MATERNAL EFFECTS TO SELECTION RESPONSE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF COMPETING MODELS. Evolution, 68: 549–558. doi: 10.1111/evo.12235
- Issue online: 28 JAN 2014
- Version of Record online: 30 SEP 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 13 AUG 2013 12:10PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Received: 6 MAY 2013
- National Science Foundation. Grant Number: DEB-0922216
- NSF. Grant Numbers: DEB-9974126, DEB-0316298
Disclaimer: Supplementary materials have been peer-reviewed but not copyedited.
|evo12235-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docx||22K||Appendix S1. Derivation of multivariate variance-components model; translation between variance-components and trait-based models.|
|evo12235-sup-0002-TableS1.docx||19K||Table S1. The maternal effects matrix (M), recalculated as described in the text from Galloway et al. (2009).|
|evo12235-sup-0003-TableS2.docx||12K||Table S2. Selection gradients (β) for ln days to flower for four selection lines (two early flowering, E1 and E2, and two late flowering, L1 and L2) each selected for three generations.|
|evo12235-sup-0004-TableS3.docx||14K||Table S3. Estimate of the additive genetic (co)variance matrix (G) for four traits using an animal model (ASReml 3.0) that ignored maternal effects.|
|evo12235-sup-0005-TableS4.docx||16K||Table S4. Estimate of the additive genetic (co)variance matrix (G) for four traits calculated using equation (A10b) and results from Table S1 and Galloway et al. (2009; Table 3a).|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.