GENETIC ISOLATION BY ENVIRONMENT OR DISTANCE: WHICH PATTERN OF GENE FLOW IS MOST COMMON?
Version of Record online: 23 SEP 2013
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 68, Issue 1, pages 1–15, January 2014
How to Cite
Sexton, J. P., Hangartner, S. B. and Hoffmann, A. A. (2014), GENETIC ISOLATION BY ENVIRONMENT OR DISTANCE: WHICH PATTERN OF GENE FLOW IS MOST COMMON?. Evolution, 68: 1–15. doi: 10.1111/evo.12258
- Issue online: 23 DEC 2013
- Version of Record online: 23 SEP 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 27 AUG 2013 10:39AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 19 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Received: 20 NOV 2012
- United States National Science Foundation. Grant Number: 1003009
- Swiss National Science Foundation
- Australian Research Council
- CSIRO Science Industry Endowment Fund
Disclaimer: Supplementary materials have been peer-reviewed but not copyedited.
|evo12258-sup-0001-TableS1.xlsx||35K||Table S1. Details from all studies included in the review and evidence for gene flow scenario designations, including study methods and IBD and IBE tests, marker type, average FST, scale, gradient type, and notes on phenotypic and adaptive divergence. See text for gene flow scenario descriptions.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.