Family Court Review

Cover image for Vol. 50 Issue 3

July 2012

Volume 50, Issue 3

Pages 373–542

  1. Editorial Notes

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial Notes
    3. Special Feature
    4. Program Profile
    5. Articles
    6. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue
    7. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators
    8. Student Notes
    1. FAMILY COURT REVIEW—JULY 2012 (pages 373–375)

      Andrew Schepard and Robert E. Emery

      Article first published online: 9 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01455.x

    2. EDITOR'S NOTE (page 376)

      Article first published online: 9 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01471.x

  2. Special Feature

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial Notes
    3. Special Feature
    4. Program Profile
    5. Articles
    6. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue
    7. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators
    8. Student Notes
  3. Program Profile

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial Notes
    3. Special Feature
    4. Program Profile
    5. Articles
    6. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue
    7. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators
    8. Student Notes
    1. THE TRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT: OUR TIPS FOR SUCCESS (pages 405–412)

      Elizabeth Patz Skola and Kara Williamson

      Article first published online: 9 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01456.x

  4. Articles

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial Notes
    3. Special Feature
    4. Program Profile
    5. Articles
    6. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue
    7. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators
    8. Student Notes
    1. COMPARING THE MEDIATION AGREEMENTS OF FAMILIES WITH AND WITHOUT A HISTORY OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE (pages 413–428)

      John W. Putz, Robin H. Ballard, Julia Gruber Arany, Amy G. Applegate and Amy Holtzworth-Munroe

      Article first published online: 9 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01457.x

    2. PERSPECTIVES ON PARENTING COORDINATION: VIEWS OF PARENTING COORDINATORS, ATTORNEYS, AND JUDICIARY MEMBERS (pages 441–454)

      Linda Fieldstone, Mackenzie C. Lee, Jason K. Baker and James P. McHale

      Article first published online: 9 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01459.x

    3. EDUCATION WELL-BEING: COURT OUTCOME MEASURES FOR CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE (pages 455–466)

      Nora E. Sydow and Victor E. Flango

      Article first published online: 9 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01460.x

  5. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial Notes
    3. Special Feature
    4. Program Profile
    5. Articles
    6. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue
    7. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators
    8. Student Notes
  6. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial Notes
    3. Special Feature
    4. Program Profile
    5. Articles
    6. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue
    7. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators
    8. Student Notes
    1. ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT SELECTION SHOULD BE GUIDED BY VALIDITY ANALYSIS NOT PROFESSIONAL PLEBISCITE: RESPONSE TO A FLAWED SURVEY (pages 502–507)

      David A. Martindale, Timothy M. Tippins, Yossef S. Ben-Porath, Jeffrey P. Wittmann and William G. Austin

      Article first published online: 8 JUN 2012 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01466.x

  7. Student Notes

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial Notes
    3. Special Feature
    4. Program Profile
    5. Articles
    6. Attachment and Family Law—Commentary Inspired by the July 2011 Special Issue
    7. More on the Working of Child Custody Evaluators
    8. Student Notes

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION