This study was made possible through the University of Singapore and University of Stanford Lee Kong Chian Distinguished Scholarship for Southeast Asia 2010 and a fellowship provided by The Freiburg Institute of Advanced Studies (FRIAS History). The author gratefully acknowledges this generous support. The paper also benefited from discussions facilitated by the University of Freiburg's Southeast Asian Studies Program which is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and audiences in Singapore, Stanford, and Freiburg. For thoughtful comments, I thank Mikko Huotari, Eric Thompson, Christian von Lübke, Marcus Mietzner, Don Emmerson, Paruedee Nguitragool, Astrid Carrapatoso, Maria-Gabriela Manea, and two anonymous reviewers. For his competent proofreading, I thank Alec Crutchley.
Constructing Regionalism Domestically: Local Actors and Foreign Policymaking in Newly Democratized Indonesia†
Article first published online: 25 JAN 2013
© 2013 International Studies Association
Foreign Policy Analysis
Volume 10, Issue 2, pages 181–201, April 2014
How to Cite
2013) Constructing Regionalism Domestically: Local Actors and Foreign Policymaking in Newly Democratized Indonesia. Foreign Policy Analysis, doi: 10.1111/fpa.12002. (
- Issue published online: 8 APR 2014
- Article first published online: 25 JAN 2013
- German Peace Foundation (DSF)
There is a dearth of studies exploring the construction of ideas on regionalism outside Europe. This article seeks to make a contribution to close this gap. It examines the construction of ideas on regionalism in Indonesia, the largest member country of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Theoretically, the paper draws from Acharya's concept of “constitutive localization” which it develops further. It offers an alternative explanation to studies which argue that as a result of mimetic behavior, social learning, and cost-benefit calculations, regional organizations across the world become increasingly similar. While this may be the case in terms of rhetoric and organizational structure, it is not necessarily the case at a normative level. The Indonesian case shows that even though foreign policy stakeholders have increasingly championed European ideas of regional integration after the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997/1998, they have skillfully amalgamated them with older local worldviews through framing, grafting, and pruning. European ideas of regional integration thereby served to modernize and relegitimize a foreign policy agenda which seeks to establish Indonesia as a regional leader with ambitions to play a major role in global politics.