Author's note: An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Montreal, Canada, in March 2011. I am grateful to Florida International University for a fellowship facilitating my research during 2012–2013. I am also grateful for the comments and suggestions of Asia Eaton, Paulette Johnson, Paul Kowert, and two anonymous reviewers. Any errors are my own.
Capabilities, Cooperation, and Culture: Mapping American Ambivalence Toward China†
Article first published online: 2 MAY 2013
© 2013 International Studies Association
Foreign Policy Analysis
Volume 10, Issue 3, pages 289–309, July 2014
How to Cite
2014) Capabilities, Cooperation, and Culture: Mapping American Ambivalence Toward China. Foreign Policy Analysis, doi: 10.1111/fpa.12020. (
- Issue published online: 15 JUL 2014
- Article first published online: 2 MAY 2013
The Sino-American relationship is arguably the most important bilateral relationship in the world. Whether this relationship remains peaceful or becomes conflictual will have far-reaching economic and political ramifications. For more than two decades, American analysts have been attempting to answer one question: Is China a threat to the United States? The result has been a voluminous collection of data that equally supports contradictory answers. I contend that if we want to understand the probable course of the Sino-American relationship, we need to ask a different question: When and why are Americans likely to perceive China as a threat? This paper reports the results of a social psychological experiment designed to explore the basis of American attitudes toward other states in general and toward China specifically. Contrary to expectations that economic insecurity drives American attitudes toward economic competitors, this study finds that American attitudes toward China are shaped primarily by cultural and institutional judgments. These results contribute to the field of IR by challenging preconceptions about the extent and potential impact of Americans' economic insecurities, by contributing to a nascent constructivist literature that examines how threat is constructed in the national imagination, and by informing how policymakers approach important bilateral relationships.