SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
gcb12020-sup-0001-FigureS1.epsimage/eps451KFigure S1. Representative T-S-profile from 10 February 2010 (start of the perturbation experiment).
gcb12020-sup-0002-FigureS2.pdfapplication/PDF86KTable S2. Mean carbonate system parameters calculated from samples taken from the prepared manipulated seawater at start and from all experimental jars at the end of the experimental period.
gcb12020-sup-0003-FigureS3.epsimage/eps418KFigure S3. Total abundance of Limacina helicina and Limacina retroversa during winter 2010 in Kongsfjorden.
gcb12020-sup-0004-FigureS4.pdfapplication/PDF502KFigure S4. Comparision of calcein stain intensity between shells from fall 2009 and winter 2010.
gcb12020-sup-0005-FigureS5.epsimage/eps425KFigure S5. MDS ordination of shell degradation categories for Limacina helicina with labels for the two-way crossed design.
gcb12020-sup-0006-FigureS6.epsimage/eps417KFigure S6. MDS ordination of shell degradation categories for Limacina retroversa with labels for the two-way crossed design.
gcb12020-sup-0007-FigureS7.pdfapplication/PDF2074KFigure S7. Representative examples of shell degradation category II ‘brownish’ (opacity) for Limacina retroversa and category III (‘scarred structures’) for Limacina helicina.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.