Advertisement

Contrasting effects of climate change in continental vs. oceanic environments on population persistence and microevolution of Atlantic salmon

Authors

  • Cyril Piou,

    Corresponding author
    1. Pau and Pays Adour University, UFR Sciences et Techniques Côte Basque, Anglet, France
    2. CIRAD, UPR Bioagresseurs analyse et maîtrise du risque, Montpellier, France
    • INRA, UMR 1224 ECOBIOP, Saint-Pée sur Nivelle, France
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Etienne Prévost

    1. INRA, UMR 1224 ECOBIOP, Saint-Pée sur Nivelle, France
    2. Pau and Pays Adour University, UFR Sciences et Techniques Côte Basque, Anglet, France
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: Cyril Piou, CIRAD BIOS, TA-A106/D, Campus International de Baillarguet, Montpellier cedex 534398, France, tel. +334 67 59 39 85, fax +334 67 59 38 73, e-mail: cyril.piou@cirad.fr

Abstract

Facing climate change (CC), species are prone to multiple modifications in their environment that can lead to extinction, migration or adaptation. Identifying the role and interplay of different potential stressors becomes a key question. Anadromous fishes will be exposed to both river and oceanic habitat changes. For Atlantic salmon, the river water temperature, river flow and oceanic growth conditions appear as three main stressing factors. They could act on population dynamics or as selective forces on life-history pathways. Using an individual-based demo-genetic model, we assessed the effects of these factors (1) to compare risks of extinction resulting from CC in river and ocean, and (2) to assess CC effects on life-history pathways including the evolution of underlying genetic control of phenotypic plasticity. We focused on Atlantic salmon populations from Southern Europe for a time horizon of three decades. We showed that CC in river alone should not lead to extinction of Southern European salmon populations. In contrast, the reduced oceanic growth appeared as a significant threat for population persistence. An increase in river flow amplitude increased the risk of local extinction in synergy with the oceanic effects, but river temperature rise reduced this risk. In terms of life-history modifications, the reduced oceanic growth increased the age of return of individuals through plastic and genetic responses. The river temperature rise increased the proportion of sexually mature parr, but the genetic evolution of the maturation threshold lowered the maturation rate of male parr. This was identified as a case of environmentally driven plastic response that masked an underlying evolutionary response of plasticity going in the opposite direction. We concluded that to counteract oceanic effects, river flow management represented the sole potential force to reduce the extinction probability of Atlantic salmon populations in Southern Europe, although this might not impede changes in migration life history.

Ancillary