SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
gcb12196-sup-0001-FigureS1-S9-TableS1-S2.docxWord document4892K

Figure S1. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Tetlin study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S2. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Yukon Flats East study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S3. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Yukon Flats Central study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S4. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Yukon Flats West study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S5. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Kanuti study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S6. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Selawik study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S7. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Koyukuk study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S8. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Togiak study area based on logistic regression model.

Figure S9. Predicted probabilities of decreasing vs. increasing lake area in the Becharof study area based on logistic regression model.

Table S1. Dates of each series of Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery used to estimate annual trends in lake area.

Table S2. Summary statistics by study area of individual lake coefficients of variation in area, intra-annual lake area trends and annual lake area trends since ca. 1985.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.