Primary Research Article
Thermal controls of Yellowstone cutthroat trout and invasive fishes under climate change
Version of Record online: 21 JUN 2013
Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Goverment work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Global Change Biology
Volume 19, Issue 10, pages 3069–3081, October 2013
How to Cite
Al-Chokhachy, R., Alder, J., Hostetler, S., Gresswell, R. and Shepard, B. (2013), Thermal controls of Yellowstone cutthroat trout and invasive fishes under climate change. Global Change Biology, 19: 3069–3081. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12262
- Issue online: 3 SEP 2013
- Version of Record online: 21 JUN 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 20 MAY 2013 05:34AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 24 APR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 17 MAR 2013
- US Geological Survey Mendenhall Fellowship Program
|gcb12262-sup-0002-FigureS1.jpg||image/jpg||356K||Figure S1. Comparisons of stream temperature and YCT growth potential computed from daily temperature (blue), 7-day smoothed daily temperatures (red), and daily interpolated data interpolated from weekly averages (green) for May 1st to September 30th at Tom Miner Creek (a and b) and the Shields River (c and d).|
|gcb12262-sup-0003-FigureS2.jpg||image/jpg||736K||Figure S2. Decadal anomalies of average stream temperatures from May 1st to September 30th relative to the based period (1980–1999) using PRISM air temperature data for a historic period of 1900–2009.|
|gcb12262-sup-0004-FigureS3.jpg||image/jpg||2710K||Figure S3. Changes in mean May 1st to September 30th surface air temperature from 2050 to 2069 relative to 1980–1999 from the MPI ECHAM5 (a), GENMOM (b), and GFDL CM2.0 (c) climate simulations (Hostetler et al., 2011).|
|gcb12262-sup-0005-FigureS4.jpg||image/jpg||170K||Figure S4. Daily stream temperature predictions using simulated air temperature data for the 1980–1999 base period (NOAA NCEP; black) and future (2050–2069) using the MPI ECHAM5 (red), GENMOM (blue), and GFDL CM2.0 (green) models during May 1st to September 30th for the Yellowstone River at Corwin Springs, MT.|
|gcb12262-sup-0006-FigureS5.jpg||image/jpg||250K||Figure S5. Examples of simulated changes in stream runoff for current (blue, 1980–1999) and future (red, 2050–2069) periods using monthly snow water equivalent (SWE) for the Upper Snake River (a), total runoff over the Upper Snake watershed (b), monthly SWE for the Upper Yellowstone River (c), and total runoff over the Upper Yellowstone watershed (d).|
Table S1. Percent changes in the number of sites with positive and negative growth-days per month within the extant (i.e., occupied) range of Yellowstone cutthroat trout (YCT) and where YCT have been extirpated.
Table S2. Summary of sites with negative (<−10%), minimal (−10% to 10%), and positive (>10%) future (2050–2069) changes in body mass relative to the 1980–1999 period for end-of-month body mass for YCT at the 110 sites that are within the extant (i.e., occupied) range of YCT and 116 sites where YCT have been extirpated.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.