SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
gcb12333-sup-0001-TableS1-FigS1-S11.pdfapplication/PDF2738K

Figure S1. Lake Pääjärvi and the studied subcatchments.

Figure S2. Modelled and measured load of DOC and DIC to Lake Pääjärvi from 6 Mustajoki catchment.

Figure S3. Modelled and measured load of DOC and DIC to Lake Pääjärvi from 11 Löytynoja catchment.

Figure S4. Modelled and measured load of DOC and DIC to Lake Pääjärvi from 12 Koiransuolenoja catchment.

Figure S5. Modelled and measured load of DOC and DIC to Lake Pääjärvi from 6 Haarajoki catchment.

Figure S6. CH4 (mg C m−3), DIC (g C m−3) and DOC (g C m−3) concentrations within Mustajoki catchment, sample points 1–6.

Figure S7. CH4 (mg C m−3), DIC (g C m−3) and DOC (g C m−3) concentrations in 7 Luhdanjoki.

Figure S8. CH4 (mg C m−3), DIC (g C m−3) and DOC (g C m−3) concentrations in 8 Pääjärvi.

Figure S9. CH4 (mg C m−3), DIC (g C m−3) and DOC (g C m−3) concentrations within Löytynoja catchment, sample points 9–12.

Figure S10. CH4 (mg C m−3), DIC (g C m−3) and DOC (g C m−3) concentrations in 13 Koiransuolenoja.

Figure S11. CH4 (mg C m−3), DIC (g C m−3) and DOC (g C m−3) concentrations in 14 Haarajoki.

Table S1. Comparison of k600 values (mean of monthly values ± SE, m d−1) determined with different models from Raymond et al. (2012).

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.