SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
gcb12443-sup-0001-TableS1-S6_FigS1-S3.docxWord document1225K

Table S1 Investigated Fluxnet sites with in situ climate and land cover classification.

Table S2 Number of Fluxnet sites per IGBP land cover class from in situ and MODIS product, respectively.

Table S3 Reref parameter table for each fitted biome, parameters p1–p3 refer to Eqn 6. ‘lwr’ and ‘upr’ indicate lower and upper confidence intervals (2.5% and 97.5%), respectively.

Table S4 Restd parameter table for each aggregated biome, parameters p1–p5 refer to Eqn 7, 8, 9. ‘lwr’ and ‘upr’ indicate lower and upper confidence intervals (2.5% and 97.5%), respectively.

Table S5 Evaluation of temperature functions for the Restd response. Each biome is fitted individually (not WL) and R2 and AIC (Akaike's Information Criterion) are mean values over all fits. DF, Degrees of freedom.

Table S6 Re evaluation for each fitted biome, based on fivefold cross-validation.

Figure S1. MODIS NDSI vs. MODIS Snow index for Temperature-Limited sites, Scatter-plots of EVI against nighttime LST (a) and (b), against ecosystem respiration (c) and against Doy of Year (d).

Figure S2. Correlations between Terra and Aqua LST products for nighttime LST (a) and daytime LST (c) and for linearly adjusted Aqua LST products (b, d).

Figure S3. Definition of the dry season in the water-limited (WL) biome.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.