SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ågren GI, Hyvönen R (2003) Changes in carbon stores in Swedish forest soils due to increased biomass harvest and increased temperatures analysed with a semi-empirical model. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 2537.
  • Äijälä O, Kuusinen M, Koistinen A (2010) Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset energiapuun korjuu ja kasvatus. [The good practice guidance to energy wood collection and growing]. Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapion julkaisuja, Forestry Development Centre Tapio, Helsinki.
  • Alam A, Kellomäki S, Kilpeläinen A, Strandman H (2012) Effects of stump extraction on the carbon sequestration in Norway spruce forest ecosystems under varying thinning regimes with implications for fossil fuel substitution. GCB Bioenergy, 5, 445458.
  • Berg B, Wessén B (1984) Changes in organic-chemical components and in growth of fungal mycelium in decomposing birch leaf litter as compared to pine needles. Pedobiologia, 26, 285298.
  • Berg B, Ekbohm G, McClaugherty C (1984) Lignin and holocellulose relations during long-term decomposition of some forest litters. Long-term decomposiotion in a scots pine forest. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique, 62, 25402550.
  • Berg B, Booltink H, Braymeyer A et al. (1991) Data on needle litter decomposition and soil climate as well as site characteristics for some coniferous forest sites. Part 2. Decomposition data. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Report, 42.
  • Blanco JA, Zavala MA, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ (2005) Sustainability of forest management practices: evaluation through a simulation model of nutrient cycling. Forest Ecology and Management, 213, 209228.
  • Brovkin V, van Bodegom P, Kleinen T, Wirth C, Cornwell W, Cornelissen J, Kattge J (2012) Plant-driven variation in decomposition rates improves projections of global litter stock distribution. Biogeosciences, 9, 565576.
  • Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, Strømman AH, Hertwich E (2011a) CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy, 3, 413426.
  • Cherubini F, Strømman AH, Hertwich E (2011b) Effects of boreal forest management practices on the climate impact of CO2 emissions from bioenergy. Ecological Modelling, 223, 5966.
  • Díaz-Yáñez O, Mola-Yudego B, Anttila P, Röser D, Asikainen A (2013) Forest chips for energy in Europe: current procurement methods and potentials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 562571.
  • Domke GM, Becker DR, D'amato AW, Ek AR, Woodall CW (2012) Carbon emissions associated with the procurement and utilization of forest harvest residues for energy, northern Minnesota, USA. Biomass and Bioenergy, 36, 141150.
  • Drebs A, Nordlund A, Karlsson P, Helminen J, Rissanen P (2002) Climatological statistics of Finland 1971–2000. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki.
  • EC (2009) Directive 2009/28/ECc of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. 2009/28. European union, Brussels. 2009/28.
  • Eriksson L, Gustavsson L (2010) Costs, CO2- and primary energy balances of forest-fuel recovery systems at different forest productivity. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34, 610619.
  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319, 12351238.
  • Fleming RL, Powers RF, Foster NW et al. (2006) Effects of organic matter removal, soil compaction, and vegetation control on 5-year seedling performance: a regional comparison of long-term soil productivity sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 529550.
  • Forsberg G (2000) Biomass energy transport: analysis of bioenergy transport chains using life cycle inventory method. Biomass and Bioenergy, 19, 1730.
  • Guest G, Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2012) The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy, 5, 459466.
  • Haberl H, Sprinz D, Bonazountas M et al. (2012) Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy, 45, 1823.
  • Hakkila P. (1989) Utilization of residual forest biomass. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Holmgren K, Eriksson E, Olsson O, Olsson M, Hillring B, Parikka M (2007) Biofuels and climate neutrality – system analysis of production and utilisation. Elforsk rapport 07:35.
  • Holtsmark B (2012) Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt. Climatic Change, 112, 415428.
  • Hope GD (2007) Changes in soil properties, tree growth, and nutrition over a period of 10 years after stump removal and scarification on moderately coarse soils in interior british columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 625635.
  • Hudiburg TW, Law BE, Wirth C, Luyssaert S (2011) Regional carbon dioxide implications of forest bioenergy production. Nature Climate Change, 1, 419423.
  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (eds. Houghton J, Ding Y, Griggs D, Noguer M, van der Linden P, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson C). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (eds. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor M, Miller H). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York.
  • Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L et al. (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma, 137, 253268.
  • Johansson M-B (1994) The influence of soil scarification on the turn-over rate of slash needles and nutrient release. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 9, 170179.
  • Johnson DW, Curtis PS (2001) Effects of forest management on soil c and n storage: meta analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 140, 227238.
  • Jylhä K, Ruosteenoja K, Räisänen J et al. (2009) Arvioita suomen muuttuvasta ilmastosta sopeutumistutkimuksia varten. Acclim-hankkeen raportti 2009. (The changing climate in Finland: Estimates for adaptation studies. Acclim project report 2009.) 2009:4, 102. (in Finnish). Helsinki, Finnish Meteorological Institute.
  • Kaipainen T, Liski J, Pussinen A, Karjalainen T (2004) Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 205219.
  • Kallio A, Salminen O, Sievänen R (2013) Sequester or substitute—Consequences of increased production of wood based energy on the carbon balance in Finland. Journal of Forest Economics. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2013.05.001.
  • Kellomäki S, Väisänen H, Hänninen H, Kolström T, Lauhanen R, Mattila U, Pajari BI (1992) Sima: a model for forest succession based on the carbon and nitrogen cycles with application to silvicultural management of the forest ecosystem. Silva Carelica, 22, 185.
  • Kendall A, Chang B, Sharpe B (2009) Accounting for time-dependent effects in biofuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions calculations. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 71427147.
  • Kirkinen J, Palosuo T, Holmgren K, Savolainen I (2008) Greenhouse impact due to the use of combustible fuels: life cycle viewpoint and relative radiative forcing commitment. Environmental Management, 42, 458469.
  • Lattimore B, Smith CT, Titus BD, Stupak I, Egnell G (2009) Environmental factors in woodfuel production: opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 13211342.
  • Lindholm E-L, Stendahl J, Berg S, Hansson P-A (2011) Greenhouse gas balance of harvesting stumps and logging residues for energy in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 26, 586594.
  • Liski J, Perruchoud D, Karjalainen T (2002) Increasing carbon stocks in the forest soils of Western Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 169, 159175.
  • Liski J, Kaasalainen S, Raumonen P, Akujärvi A, Krooks A, Repo A, Kaasalainen M (2013) Indirect emissions of forest bioenergy: detailed modeling of stump-root systems. Global Change Biology. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12091.
  • Lohila A, Minkkinen K, Laine J et al. (2010) Forestation of boreal peatlands: Impacts of changing albedo and greenhouse gas fluxes on radiative forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, G4 G04011.
  • Mäkipää R (1995) Effect of nitrogen input on carbon accumulation of boreal forest soils and ground vegetation. Forest Ecology and Management, 79, 217226.
  • Mantau U, Saal U, Prins K et al. (2010) Euwood - real potential for changes in growth and use of EU forests. Final report. June 2010. Hamburg.
  • Martikainen PJ, Aarnio T, Taavitsainen V-M, Päivinen L, Salonen K (1989) Mineralization of carbon and nitrogen in soil samples taken from three fertilized pine stands: long-term effects. Plant and Soil, 114, 99106.
  • Masera OR, Garza-Caligaris JF, Kanninen M et al. (2003) Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX v. 2 approach. Ecological Modelling, 164, 177199.
  • McKechnie J, Colombo S, Chen J, Mabee W, Maclean HL (2011) Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 789795.
  • Melillo JM, Reilly JM, Kicklighter DW et al. (2009) Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science, 326, 13971399.
  • Melin Y, Petersson H, Egnell G (2010) Assessing carbon balance trade-offs between bioenergy and carbon sequestration of stumps at varying time scales and harvest intensities. Forest Ecology and Management, 260, 536542.
  • Monni S, Korhonen R, Savolainen I (2003) Radiative forcing due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from Finland: methods for estimating forcing of a country or an activity. Environmental Management, 31, 401411.
  • Nilsen P (2001) Fertilization experiments on forest mineral soils: a review of the Norwegian results. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 541554.
  • Nohrstedt H-Ö (2001) Response of coniferous forest ecosystems on mineral soils to nutrient additions: a review of Swedish experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 555573.
  • Olsson P, Linder S, Giesler R, Högberg P (2005) Fertilization of boreal forest reduces both autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration. Global Change Biology, 11, 17451753.
  • Palosuo T, Wihersaari M, Liski J (2001) Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions Due to Energy Use of Forest Residues - Impact of Soil Carbon Balance. EFI Proceedings no 39, Wood biomass as an energy source challange in Europe, European Forest Institute, Joensuu.
  • Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J et al. (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science, 333, 988993.
  • Peng Y, Thomas SC, Dalung T (2008) Forest management and soil respiration: implications for carbon sequestration. Environmental Reviews, 16, 93111.
  • Pingoud K, Ekholm T, Savolainen I (2012) Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17, 369386.
  • Rastetter EB, Ryan MG, Shaver GR, Melillo JM, Nadelhoffer KJ, Hobbie JE, Aber JD (1991) A general biogeochemical model describing the responses of the c and n cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to changes in CO2, climate, and n deposition. Tree Physiology, 9, 101126.
  • Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I, Clarke N, Callesen I, Helmisaari H-S, Karltun E, Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene I (2008) Effects of very intensive forest biomass harvesting on short and long term site productivity. In: Sustainable Use Of Forest Biomass For Energy (eds Röser D, Asikainen A, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I), pp. 2978. Springer, the Netherlands.
  • Raumonen P, Kaasalainen S, Kaasalainen M, Kaartinen H (2011) Approximation of volume and branch size distribution of trees from laser scanner data., International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Sciences, 38(5/W12).
  • Repo A, Tuomi M, Liski J (2011) Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 3, 107115.
  • Repo A, Känkänen R, Tuovinen J-P, Antikainen R, Tuomi M, Vanhala P, Liski J (2012) Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 4, 202212.
  • Routa J, Kellomaki S, Peltola H (2012) Impacts of intensive management and landscape structure on timber and energy wood production and net CO2 emissions from energy wood use of Norway spruce. BioEnergy Research, 5, 106123.
  • Saarsalmi A, Mälkönen E (2001) Forest fertilization research in Finland: a literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 514535.
  • Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2011) Time-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 25062516.
  • Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2012) Time-dependent radiative forcing effects of forest fertilization and biomass substitution. Biogeochemistry, 109, 203218.
  • Schelhaas MJ, Van Esch PW, Groen TA et al. (2004) Co2fix v 3.1 - a modelling framework for quantifying carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. In: Alterra report 1068.
  • Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Lüdeke M (1995) Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass and Bioenergy, 8, 221234.
  • Schulze E-D, Körner C, Law BE, Haberl H, Luyssaert S (2012) Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 4, 611616.
  • Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA et al. (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319, 12381240.
  • Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J et al. (2009) Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science, 326, 527528.
  • Shine K (2009) The global warming potential – the need for an interdisciplinary retrial. Climatic Change, 96, 467472.
  • Sievänen R, Salminen O, Lehtonen A, Ojanen P, Liski J, Ruosteenoja K, Tuomi M (2013) Carbon stock changes of forest land in Finland under different levels of wood use and climate change. Annals of Forest Science. doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0295-7.
  • SLU (2009) Stubbskörd och miljöeffekter- tema stubbar - årsrapport för 2009 (In Swedish, Stump harvesting and environmental impacts - theme stumps – year report for 2009). Swedish university of agricultural sciences, Uppsala.
  • Söderström B, Baath E, Lundgren B (1983) Decrease in soil microbial activity and biomasses owing to nitrogen amendments. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 29, 15001506.
  • Strömgren M, Egnell G, Olsson BA (2012a) Carbon stocks in four forest stands in Sweden 25 years after harvesting of slash and stumps. Forest Ecology and Management, 290, 5966.
  • Strömgren M, Mjöfors K, Holmström B, Grelle A (2012b) Soil CO2 flux during the first years after stump harvesting in two swedish forests. Silva Fennica, 46, 6779.
  • Stupak I, Asikainen A, Jonsell M et al. (2007) Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy-possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. Biomass and Bioenery, 31, 666684.
  • Thiffault E, Hannam KD, Paré D, Titus BD, Hazlett PW, Maynard DG, Brais S (2011) Effects of forest biomass harvesting on soil productivity in boreal and temperate forests — a review. Environmental Reviews, 19, 278309.
  • Tuomi M, Thum T, Järvinen H et al. (2009) Leaf litter decomposition–estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model. Ecological Modelling, 220, 33623371.
  • Tuomi M, Laiho R, Repo A, Liski J (2011a) Wood decomposition model for boreal forests. Ecological Modelling, 222, 709718.
  • Tuomi M, Rasinmäki J, Repo A, Vanhala P, Liski J (2011b) Soil carbon model yasso07 graphical user interface. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 13581362.
  • Walker T, Cardellichio P, Colnes A et al. (2010) Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study. June 2010 nci-2010-03. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Massachusetts.
  • Wall A (2012) Risk analysis of effects of whole-tree harvesting on site productivity. Forest Ecology and Management, 282, 175184.
  • Walmsley JD, Godbold DL (2010) Stump harvesting for bioenergy - a review of the environmental impacts. Forestry, 83, 1738.
  • Wihersaari M (2005) Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28, 435443.
  • Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2011) Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 4, 761772.
  • Zetterberg L, Uppenberg S, Åhman M (2004) Climate impact from peat utilisation in sweden. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, 3776.