The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).
Lessons from the Bay of Bengal ITLOS case: stepping offshore for a ‘deeper’ maritime political geography
Article first published online: 12 DEC 2013
© 2013 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
The Geographical Journal
Volume 180, Issue 3, pages 260–264, September 2014
How to Cite
Lin, S. and Schofield, C. (2014), Lessons from the Bay of Bengal ITLOS case: stepping offshore for a ‘deeper’ maritime political geography. The Geographical Journal, 180: 260–264. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12060
- Issue published online: 11 AUG 2014
- Article first published online: 12 DEC 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: SEP 2013
- Bay of Bengal;
- maritime boundary delimitation;
- ‘grey area’
On 14 March 2012, the International Tribunal for Law of the Sea (ITLOS) delimited a maritime boundary with respect to multiple distinct maritime jurisdictional zones (territorial sea, exclusive economic zone and continental shelf) between Bangladesh and Myanmar (Bay of Bengal Case). ITLOS did not, however, wholly resolve the issues of marine governance that the two states face in the Bay of Bengal, leaving a number of complex and potentially problematic issues outstanding, including the unique creation of what was termed a ‘grey area’, the governance arrangements for which are open to debate. This commentary highlights future opportunities of research on the outer continental shelf and the grey area in political geography.