Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation

Cover image for Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation

February 2002

Volume 22, Issue 1

Pages 30–120

    1. In Situ Biodegradation Is Better Than Monitored Natural Attenuation (pages 30–39)

      Evan K. Nyer and Gus Suarez

      Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2007 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00651.x

    2. Arsenic MCL Redux (pages 44–45)

      Stuart Cohen

      Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2007 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00653.x

    3. DNAPL Characterization Methods and Approaches, Part 2: Cost Comparisons (pages 46–61)

      Mark L. Kram, Arturo A. Keller, Joseph Rossabi and Lome G. Everett

      Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2007 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00654.x

    4. Evaluation of BTEX Remediation by Natural Attenuation at a Coastal Facility (pages 62–77)

      Monica P. Suarez and Hanadi S. Rifai

      Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2007 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00655.x

    5. Ethanol-Stimulated Bioremediation of Nitrate-Contaminated Ground Water (pages 78–87)

      B. Tartakovsky, D. Millette, S. Del Isle and S.R. Guiot

      Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2007 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00656.x

    6. Experimental Evaluation of Fouling Processes in Porous Polyethylene Well Screens Used for Horizontal Wells (pages 98–105)

      Andrew J. Logan, Robert L. Siegrist and Junko Munakata-Mars

      Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2007 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00658.x

    7. Abandoned Underground Storage Tank Location Using Fluxgate Magnetic Surveying: A Case Study (pages 116–120)

      Thomas P. Van Biersel, Bill C. Bristoll, Robert W. Taylor and James Rose

      Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2007 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00660.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION