Corrections made after online publication August 17, 2014: author names have been updated.
Two Studies Examining the Error Theory Underlying the Measurement Model of the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale
Version of Record online: 17 AUG 2014
© 2014 International Communication Association
Human Communication Research
Volume 41, Issue 1, pages 55–81, January 2015
How to Cite
Beatty, M. J., Pascual-Ferra, P. and Levine, T. R. (2015), Two Studies Examining the Error Theory Underlying the Measurement Model of the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale. Human Communication Research, 41: 55–81. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12039
- Issue online: 17 DEC 2014
- Version of Record online: 17 AUG 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 30 MAY 2014
- Manuscript Revised: 22 MAY 2014
- Manuscript Received: 6 MAY 2013
Meta-analysis indicates moderate correlations between the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale (VAS) and other self-report measures but near-zero correlations with behavioral measures. Accurately interpreting correlations between the VAS and other variables, however, requires an examination of the untested error theory underlying the measurement model for the VAS. In two separate studies, the results of single-factor correlated uniqueness confirmatory factor analytic models revealed a pattern of significant error covariances indicating that VAS item scores are confounded by systematic error attributable to multiple unspecified latent effects. After pruning the item sets, we identified 4 items that were free of latent variable influences other than trait verbal aggressiveness. Implications for interpreting the verbal aggressiveness literature are discussed along with recommendations for revising the VAS.