Retrospective Outcome Analyses for Headaches in a Pain Rehabilitation Interdisciplinary Program

Authors


  • Conflict of Interest: Dr. Tepper receives grants/research support from Allergan, ATI, BristolMyerSquibb, GSK, MAP, Merck, NuPathe, Valkee, and Zogenix. These grants do not go to him personally, and do not count toward his salary at Cleveland Clinic.
  • All amounts received are <$10,000/year per Cleveland Clinic Policy and are listed on the Cleveland Clinic website.
  • In the last 12 months, he has served as a consultant for Allergan, ATI, MAP, Nautilus, NuPathe, Pfizer, and Zogenix.
  • In the last 12 months, he has served on the speakers bureau for Allergan, MAP, Nautilus, and Zogenix.
  • In the last 12 months, he served on advisory boards for Allergan, ATI, MAP, Nautilus, NuPathe, USWorldMeds, and Zogenix.
  • He has stock options in ATI.
  • All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Address all correspondence to S. Tepper, Headache Center, Cleveland Clinic, C21, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA, email: teppers@ccf.org

Abstract

Background

Incapacitating chronic migraine and other severe headaches can have significant impact on peoples' lives, including family and occupational functioning. Although a number of reports have investigated the prevalence and medical treatment of chronic headache, few have reported on the efficacy of treating these disorders within a comprehensive, intensive chronic pain rehabilitation program (CPRP), instead of a headache-specific program. CPRPs provide treatment of headache by focusing not only on physical pain, but also its association with impaired mood and function.

Methods

We examined the efficacy of CPRP in patients with chronic headache via a retrospective analysis of 123 patients (76.4% female), ages 21 to 85, who completed the CPRP at the Cleveland Clinic between January 2007 and December 2011, and were diagnosed using International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition and International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition revision, with migraine or headache as a major complaint. Outcome measures included: pain intensity scores present at the moment of questioning where 10 is the maximal (0-10/10), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) scores, (measuring mood), and Pain Disability Index scores (measuring function). Repeated measures t-tests were used.

Results

Average pain score on admission was 6.4, and 3.4 upon discharge. Average function on admission was moderately impaired, and normalized on discharge. The average depression score was in the moderate range, and had normalized on discharge. The average anxiety score on admission was in the severe range and was in the mild range on discharge.

Conclusions

Results indicate that individuals had statistically and clinically meaningful improvement in pain, mood, and function. Data suggest that an interdisciplinary CPRP approach for patients diagnosed with headache can be effective in helping to decrease pain, as well as normalize mood and function. Thus, CPRPs serve as an alternative treatment to multidisciplinary headache programs, interventional pain techniques, and primary care standard headache care.

Ancillary