• 1
    Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implementation Science, 2006; 1: 116.
  • 2
    Joosten EA, Defuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2008; 77: 219226.
  • 3
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. The British Journal of General Practice, 2000; 50: 892.
  • 4
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine, 1999; 49: 651661.
  • 5
    Kremer H, Ironson G, Schneiderman N, Hautzinger M. “It's my body”: does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict? Medical Decision Making, 2007; 27: 522532.
  • 6
    Hudak PL, Frankel RM, Braddock C III et al. Do patients' communication behaviors provide insight into their preferences for participation in decision making? Medical Decision Making, 2008; 28: 385393.
  • 7
    Er M. Decision support systems: a summary, problems, and future trends. Decision Support Systems, 1988; 4: 355363.
  • 8
    Bell DE, Raiffa H, Tversky A. Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In: Bell DE, Raiffa H, Tversky A (eds) Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988: 932.
  • 9
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of business, 1986; 59: 251278.
  • 10
    Karni E. A theory of medical decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2009; 39: 116.
  • 11
    Te'eni D, Ginzberg MJ. Human-computer decision systems: the multiple roles of DSS. European journal of operational research, 1991; 50: 127139.
  • 12
    Hill JB, Wallace WA. Decision support in a guaranteed student loan program: design and implementation of a model-based system. Information & Management, 1985; 9: 215225.
  • 13
    Turban E, Watkins PR. Integrating expert systems and decision support systems. MIS Quarterly, 1986; 10: 121136.
  • 14
    Wilson RA, Keil FC. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 2001.
  • 15
    Goldie SJ, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Garnett GP. Public health policy for cervical cancer prevention: the role of decision science, economic evaluation, and mathematical modeling. Vaccine, 2006; 24: S155S163.
  • 16
    Hunink MGM, Glasziou P, Siegel JE et al. Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • 17
    ACOG. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obsterician–Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 77, 2007; 217228.
  • 18
    Pollock K. Concordance in Medical Consultations: A Critical Review. London: Radcliffe Publishing, 2006: p.155.
  • 19
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine, 1997; 44: 681692.
  • 20
    Charles CA, Whelan T, Gafni A, Willan A, Farrell S. Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003; 21: 932936.
  • 21
    Hewison J, Green JM, Ahmed S et al. Attitudes to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: a comparison of white and Pakistani women in the UK. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2007; 27: 419430.
  • 22
    Ruland C. CHOICEs: patients as participants in shared care planning at the point of care. In: Lewis DA, Eysenbach G, Kukla R, Stavri PZ, Jimison H (eds) Consumer Health Informatics: Informing Consumers and Improving Health Care. New York: Springer, 2005: 208216.
  • 23
    Shortliffe EH. Computer programs to support clinical decision making. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987; 258: 6166.
  • 24
    Musen MA, Shahar Y, Shortliffe EH. Clinical decision-support systems. In: Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ (eds) Biomedical Informatics. New York: Springer, 2006: 698736.
  • 25
    Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 2004; 28: 75105.
  • 26
    Heckerling PS, Verp MS. Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing: a decision analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991; 44: 657670.
  • 27
    Durand MA, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals. Health Expectations, 2010; 13: 125138.
  • 28
    Potter BK, O'Reilly N, Etchegary H et al. Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: findings from a qualitative study. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 355365.
  • 29
    Norman J, Shahar Y, Kuppermann M, Gold B. Decision-Theoretic Analysis of Prenatal Testing Strategies. Technical Report SMI-98-0711, Stanford Medical Informatics, 1998.
  • 30
    Scott GC, Shachter RD. Individualizing generic decision models using assessments as evidence. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2005; 38: 281297.
  • 31
    Kuppermann M, Learman LA, Gates E et al. Beyond race or ethnicity and socioeconomic status: predictors of prenatal testing for Down syndrome. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2006; 107: 1087.
  • 32
    Neumann PJ, Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC. Rereference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care. Annual Reviews in Public Health, 2000; 21: 587611.
  • 33
    Liang H, Xue Y, Berger BA. Web-based intervention support system for health promotion. Decision Support Systems, 2006; 42: 435449.
  • 34
    The Israeli Medical Risk Management (MRM) Company. Amniocentesis agreement form, 2007.
  • 35
    Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Social science & medicine, 1998; 47: 329339.
  • 36
    Say R, Robson S, Thomson R. Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics. BMJ Open, 2011; 1: doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261.
  • 37
    Chervany NL, Dickson GW. An experimental evaluation of information overload in a production environment. Management Science, 1974; 20: 13351344.
  • 38
    Ahituv N. Assessing the value of information: problems and approaches. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems. Boston, Massachusetts: Association for Information Systems, 1989.
  • 39
    Adar Z, Ahituv N, Berman O. The value of an information system for service networks. Computers & Operations Research, 1985; 12: 7185.