SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    University of Toronto Joint Center for Bioethics. Stand on Guard for Thee. Ethical considerations in Preparedness Planning for Pandemic Influenza. Pandemic Influenza Working Group. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2005.
  • 2
    World Health Organization (WHO). Ethical Considerations in Developing a Public Health Response to Pandemic Influenza. Genève: World Health Organization, 2007. Available at: www.who.int/entity/csr/resources/publications/WHO_CDS_EPR_GIP_2007_2c.pdf, accessed 17 September 2012.
  • 3
    National Ethics Advisory Committee. Getting Through Together: Ethical Values for a Pandemic. Wellington N.Z.: Ministry of Health, 2007.
  • 4
    UK Department of Health. Responding to Pandemic Influenza: The Ethical Framework for Policy and Planning. London: Department of Health, 2007.
  • 5
    Kinlaw K, Levine R. Ethical Guidelines in Pandemic Influenza: Recommendations of the Ethics Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee to the Director. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007.
  • 6
    Institut national de la santé publique du Québec (INSPQ). Bilan épidémiologique de la pandémie d'influenza A(H1N1). Province de Québec - 2009. Québec: Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Direction de l'analyse et de l'évaluation des systèmes de soins et services, 2010.
  • 7
    Fung A. Recipes for public Spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2003; 11: 338367.
  • 8
    Springett J. Participatory Approaches to Evaluation in Health Promotion. In: Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B et al. (eds) Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. Denmark: World Health Organization, 2001: 83106.
  • 9
    Baum NM, Jacobson PD, Goold SD. “Listen to the people”: public deliberation about social distancing measures in a pandemic. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2009; 9: 414.
  • 10
    Kass NE, Otto J, O'Brien D, Minson M. Ethics and severe pandemic influenza: maintaining essential functions through a fair and considered response. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefences Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2008; 6: 227236.
  • 11
    Keystone Center for Science and Public Policy. Citizen voices on pandemic flu choices. A Report of the Public Engagement Pilot. Final report 2005. Available at: http://ppc.unl.edu/documents/PEPPPI_FINALREPORT_DEC_2005.pdf, accessed 17 September 2012.
  • 12
    Keystone Center for Science and Public Policy. Available at: http://www.keystone.org/images/keystone-center/spp-documents/2011/H1N1/final-h1n1-report-sept-30-2009.pdf, accessed 17 September 2012.
  • 13
    Institute of Medicine (IOM). Ethical and Legal Considerations in Mitigating Pandemic Disease: Workshop Summary. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC: The National Academic Press, 2007.
  • 14
    DeCoster B. Currents in contemporary ethics: Avian influenza and the failure of public rationing discussions. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 2006; 34: 620623.
  • 15
    Rogers WA, Street J, Braunack-Mayer AJ, Hiller JE. Pandemic influenza communication: views from a deliberative forum. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 331342.
  • 16
    Murphy NJ. Citizen deliberation in setting healthcare priorities. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 172181.
  • 17
    Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine, 2003; 57: 239251.
  • 18
    Jacobs LP, Lomax Cook F, Delli Carpini MX. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
  • 19
    Dupras C, Williams-Jones B. The expert and the lay public: reflectiions on influenza A(H1N1) and the risk society. American Journal of Public Health, 2012; 102: 591595.
  • 20
    Comité d'éthique de santé publique. Avis du Comité d'éthique de santé publique Volet santé publique du Plan québécois de lutte à une pandémie d'influenza — Mission santé. Québec: Government of Quebec, 2006.
  • 21
    Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec (MSSSQ). Quebec Pandemic influenza Plan – Health Mission, 2006. Available at: http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/2005/05-235-06a.pdf, accessed 15 March 2011.
  • 22
    Singer PA, Benatar SR, Bernstein M et al. Ethics and SARS: lessons from Toronto. British Medical Journal, 2003; 327: 13421344.
  • 23
    Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
  • 24
    Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
  • 25
    Gibbs G. Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with Nvivo. Buckingham/Philadelphia, PA: Open University, 2002.
  • 26
    Paillé P, Muchielli A. L'analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Collin, 2008.
  • 27
    Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006.
  • 28
    Plummer-D'Amato P. Focus-group methodology Part 2: considerations for analysis. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 2008; 15: 123129.
  • 29
    Dare T. Mass immunization programmes: some philosophical issues. Bioethics, 1998; 12: 125149.
  • 30
    Dawson A. Vaccination and the prevention problem. Bioethics, 2004; 18: 515529.
  • 31
    Verweij M, Dawson A. Ethical principles for collective immunisation programmes. Vaccine, 2004; 22: 31223126.
  • 32
    Nuffield Council on bioethics. Public Health: Ethical Issues, 2007. Available at: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/Public%20health%20-%20ethical%20issues.pdf, accessed 17 September 2012.
  • 33
    Holland S. Public Health Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
  • 34
    Ritvo P, Wilson K, Gibson JL et al. Canadian survey on pandemic flu preparations. BMC Public Health, 2010; 10: 125.
  • 35
    Health Canada. Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public involvement in Decision Making. Ottawa: Corporate Consultation Secretariat, Health Policy and Communications Branch, Government of Canada, 2000.
  • 36
    Slocum N, Elliott J, Heesterbeek S, Lukensmeyer CJ. Méthodes participatives, un guide pour l'utilisateur. Brussels: Fondation Roi Beaudoin, 2006, Available at: www.kbs-frb.be/files/db/fr/PUB%5F1600%5FMethodesparticipatives.pdf, accessed 17 September 2012.
  • 37
    Prémont K. Les méthodes de consultations publiques. Étape 1: Description et comparaison; Les méthodes de consultation publiques Étape 2: Analyse critique. Montréal: Laboratoire d'éthique publique, 2002.
  • 38
    Kotalik J. Preparing for an influenza pandemic: ethical issues. Bioethics, 2005; 19: 422431.
  • 39
    World Health Organization (WHO). Outbreak Communication Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
  • 40
    Abelson J, Gauvin FP, Watling J, MacKinnon MP. Transparency, Trust and Citizen engagement - What Canadians Are Saying about Accountability. Réseaux canadiens de recherche en politiques publiques, December 2004. Available at: http://www.cprn.org/doc.cfm?doc=1141&l=fr, accessed 17 September 2012.