SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Davies C, Wetherell M, Barnett E. Citizens at the Centre: Deliberative Participation in Healthcare Decisions. Bristol: Policy Press, 2006.
  • 2
    Øvretveit J. Does Improving Quality Save Money? A Review of the Evidence of Which Improvements to Quality Reduce Costs to Health Service Providers. London: Health Foundation, 2009.
  • 3
    Dixon-Woods M. Why is patient safety so hard? A selective review of ethnographic studies conducted as part of the Patient Safety Research Programme. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2010; 15: 1116.
  • 4
    Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM et al. Advancing the science of patient safety. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2011; 154: 693696.
  • 5
    Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Quality and Safety, 2012; 21: 876884.
  • 6
    Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine, 2003; 57: 239251.
  • 7
    Martin GP. Public and user participation in public service delivery: tensions in policy and practice. Sociology Compass, 2009; 3: 310326.
  • 8
    Frankish CJ, Kwan B, Ratner PA, Wharf Higgins J, Larsen C. Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities. Social Science and Medicine, 2002; 54: 14711480.
  • 9
    Craig GM. Involving users in developing health services. British Medical Journal, 2008; 336: 286287.
  • 10
    Fudge N, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. British Medical Journal, 2008; 336: 313.
  • 11
    Staniszewska S, Herron-Marx S, Mockford C. Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2008; 20: 373374.
  • 12
    Oliver S, Rees R, Clarke-Jones L et al. A multi-dimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 7284.
  • 13
    Nilsen E, Myrhaug H, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman A. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006; CD004563.
  • 14
    Vincent CA, Coulter A. Patient safety: what about the patient? Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2002; 11: 7678.
  • 15
    Koutantji M, Davis R, Vincent C, Coulter A. The patient's role in patient safety: engaging patients, their representatives, and health professionals. Clinical Risk, 2005; 11: 99104.
  • 16
    Jaques H. Putting patients at the heart of quality. British Medical Journal, 2012; 344: e3164.
  • 17
    Ling T, Soper B, Watt A et al. Evidence: Involving Primary Care Clinicians in Quality Improvement. London: Health Foundation, 2012.
  • 18
    Peat M, Entwistle V, Hall J, Birks Y, Golder S, on behalf of the PIPS Group. Scoping review and approach to appraisal of interventions intended to involve patients in patient safety. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2010; 15: 1725.
  • 19
    Church J, Saunders D, Wanke M, Pong R, Spooner C, Dorgan M. Citizen participation in health decision-making: past experience and future prospects. Journal of Public Health Policy, 2002; 23: 1232.
  • 20
    Martin GP. Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. Social Science and Medicine, 2008; 67: 17571765.
  • 21
    Harrison S, Mort M. Which champions, which people? Public and user involvement in health care as a technology of legitimation. Social Policy and Administration, 1998; 32: 6070.
  • 22
    Entwistle VA, McCaughan D, Watt IS, et al. Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2010; 19: e33.
  • 23
    Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 1989; 14: 532550.
  • 24
    Aveling E-L, Martin GP, Armstrong N, Banerjee J, Dixon-Woods M. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2012; 26: 158174.
  • 25
    Woods DD, Dekker S, Cook R, Johannesen L, Sarter N. Behind Human Error. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.
  • 26
    Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
  • 27
    Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Crawford MJ, Fulop N. Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science and Medicine, 2004; 58: 19731984.
  • 28
    Martin GP, Finn R. Patients as team members: opportunities, challenges and paradoxes of including patients in multi-professional healthcare teams. Sociology of Health and Illness, 2011; 33: 10501065.
  • 29
    Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Aveling E-L, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Quarterly, 2011; 89: 167205.
  • 30
    Donaldson LJ. Put the patient in the room, always. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 2008; 17: 8283.
  • 31
    Barnes M, Newman J, Sullivan H. Power, Participation and Political Renewal: Case Studies in Public Participation. Bristol: Policy Press, 2007.
  • 32
    Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. British Medical Journal, 2007; 334: 129132.
  • 33
    Martin GP. ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health and Illness, 2008; 30: 3554.