SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Lambert H. Evidentiary truths? The evidence of anthropology through the anthropology of medical evidence. Anthropology Today, 2009; 25: 1620.
  • 2
    Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy, 2006; 75: 280297.
  • 3
    Buckland S, Hayes H, Ostrer C et al. How to get Actively Involved in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2007.
  • 4
    de Wit MP, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ et al. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2011; 70: 722726.
  • 5
    Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the design and conduct of clinical trials: a review. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 2011; 5: 91111.
  • 6
    Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintryre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 2008; 337: a1655.
  • 7
    Angell KL, Kreshka MA, Donnelly P et al. Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2003; 18: 499507.
  • 8
    Marsden P, Bradburn J. The Consumers' Advisory Group for Clinical Trials (CAG-CT), the Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial. Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 617.
  • 9
    Lambert H. Accounting for EBM: notions of evidence in medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 2006; 62: 26332645.
  • 10
    Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2007; 61: 254261.
  • 11
    Dziedzic KS, Hill S, Nicholls E et al. Self management, joint protection and exercises in hand osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial with cost effectiveness analyses. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2011; 12: 156.
  • 12
    Minns Lowe CJ, Barker KL, Dewey M, Sackley CM. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 2007; 335: 812.
  • 13
    Eccleston C, Williams AC, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012.
  • 14
    Moerman D. Meaning, Medicine and the ‘Placebo Effect'. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 15
    Doherty M, Dieppe P. The ‘placebo’ response in osteoarthritis and its implications for clinical practice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2009; 17: 12551262.
  • 16
    Kaptchuk TJ. Powerful placebo: the dark side of the randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 1998; 351: 17221725.
  • 17
    Miller FG, Kaptchuk TJ. The power of context: reconceptualising the placebo effect. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2008; 101: 222225.
  • 18
    Geers AL, Weiland PE, Kosbab K, Landry SJ, Helfer SG. Goal activation, expectations, and the placebo effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005; 89: 143159.
  • 19
    Edwards SJL, Stevens AJ, Braunholtz DA, Lilford RJ, Swift T. The ethics of placebo-controlled trials: a comparison of inert and active placebo controls. World Journal of Surgery, 2005; 29: 610614.
  • 20
    Foster NE, Thomas E, Barlas P et al. Acupuncture as an adjunct to exercise based physiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2007; 335: 436.
  • 21
    Paterson C, Dieppe P. Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture. BMJ, 2005; 330: 12021205.
  • 22
    Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Cuthbertson BH et al. Developing a placebo-controlled trial in surgery: issues of design, acceptability and feasibility. Trials, 2011; 12: 50.
  • 23
    Stamm T, van der Gisesn F, Thorstensson C et al. Patient perspective of hand osteoarthritis in relation to concepts covered by instruments measuring functioning: a qualitative European multicentre study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2009; 68: 14531460.
  • 24
    Kjeken I, Smedslund G, Moe RH et al. Systematic review of design and effects of splints and exercise programs in hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care and Research, 2011; 63: 834848.
  • 25
    Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2011; 19: 12701285.
  • 26
    Zhang Y, Niu J, Kelly-Hayes M, Chaisson CE, Aliabadi P, Felson DT. Prevalence of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among the elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2002; 156: 10211027.
  • 27
    Dziedzic KS, Thomas E, Hill S, Wilkie R, Peat G, Croft PR. The impact of musculoskeletal hand problems in older adults: findings from the North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project (NorStOP). Rheumatology, 2007; 46: 963967.
  • 28
    National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Osteoathritis: The Care and Management of Osteoarthritis in Adults. Nice Clinical Guideline 59, London: National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, 2008.
  • 29
    Ye L, Kalichman L, Spittle A, Dobson F, Bennell K. Effects of rehabilitative interventions on pain, function and physical impairments in people with hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 2011; 13: R28.
  • 30
    Dziedzic KS. Osteoarthritis: best evidence for best therapies in hand osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2011; 7: 258260.
  • 31
    Hill S, Dziedzic KS, Ong BN. Patients' perceptions of the treatment and management of hand osteoarthritis: a focus group enquiry. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2011; 33: 18661872.
  • 32
    Fess EE. A history of splinting: to understand the present, view the past. Journal of Hand Therapy, 2002; 15: 97132.
  • 33
    Adams J Orthotics of the hand. In: Dziedzic K, Hammond A (eds) Rheumatology: Evidence-based Practice for Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists. London: Elsevier Ltd, 2010: 163170.
  • 34
    Avins AL, Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Goldberg H, Pressman A. Should we reconsider the routine use of placebo controls in clinical research? Trials, 2012; 13: 44.
  • 35
    Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH) User requirements during the product development pathway. Available at: http://match-guide.brunel.ac.uk/development.aspx, accessed 8 November 2011.
  • 36
    Ram M, Grocott PR, Weir HCM. Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 6371.
  • 37
    INVOLVE. What You Need to Know About Payment: An Introductory Guide for Members of the Public who are Considering Active Involvement in NHS, Public Health or Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2011. Available at: http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/INVOLVEpaymentdocument2011.pdf, accessed 12 March 2012.
  • 38
    Rowe G, Frewer LJ. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2005; 30: 251290.
  • 39
    Tarpey M. Public Involvement in Research Applications to the National Research Ethics Service. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2011.
  • 40
    Vale CL, Thompson LC, Murphy C, Forcat S, Hanley B. Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: results of a survey. Trials, 2012; 13: 9.
  • 41
    Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ, 2001; 322: 519523.
  • 42
    Hansson SO. Uncertainty and the ethics of clinical trials. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2006; 27: 149167.
  • 43
    Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011; 27: 391399.
  • 44
    INVOLVE. What is Public Involvement in Research. Available at: http://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/, accessed 11 October 2012.
  • 45
    McIntyre A. Participatory Action Research: A Qualitative Research Methods Series 52. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2008.
  • 46
    Gooberman-Hill A. Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences. The Patient-Patient—Centered Outcomes Research, 2012; 5: 215–223.