SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Sato T, Takeichi M, Hara T, Koizumi S. Second opinion behavior among Japanese primary care patients. British Journal of General Practice, 1999; 49: 546550.
  • 2
    Van Dalen I, Groothoff J, Stewart R, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen P, van Horn J. Motives for seeking a second opinion in orthopaedic surgery. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2001; 6: 195201.
  • 3
    Clauson J, Hsieh YC, Acharya S, Rademaker AW, Morrow M. Results of the Lynn Sage second-opinion program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer, 2002; 94: 889894.
  • 4
    Mellink WA, Dulmen AM, Wiggers T, Spreeuwenberg PM, Eggermont AM, Bensing JM. Cancer patients seeking a second surgical opinion: results of a study on motives, needs, and expectations. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003; 21: 14921497.
  • 5
    Improving the 21st-century health care system. In: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine (ed.) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Tenth printing. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2010: 3960.
  • 6
    Ong LML, de Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 1995; 40: 903918.
  • 7
    Mead N, Bower P. Patient centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science and Medicine, 2000; 51: 10871110.
  • 8
    Bensing J. Bidging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Education and Counseling, 2000; 39: 1725.
  • 9
    Roter D, Hall JA. Doctors Talking with Patients/Patients Talking with Doctors. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006.
  • 10
    Japan Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. Notice: revision of calculation for health care reimbursements. No. 0306012 March 6, 2006.
  • 11
    Yum JO. The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. In: Samovar LA, Porter RE (eds) Intercultural Communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000: 6373.
  • 12
    McDaniel ER, Quasha S. The communicative aspects of doing business in Japan. In: Samovar LA, Porter RE (eds) Intercultural Communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000: 213324.
  • 13
    Chen G-M, Chung J. The “five Asian dragons”: management behaviors and organizational communication. In: Samovar LA, Porter RE (eds) Intercultural Communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000: 301312.
  • 14
    Sato T, Takeichi M, Shirahama M, Fukui T, Gude JK. Doctor-shopping patients and users of alternative medicine among Japanese primary care patients. General Hospital Psychiatry, 1995; 17: 115125.
  • 15
    United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Getting a second opinion before surgery. CMS Product No. 02173, revised June 2010.
  • 16
    Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, the Second Opinion Clinic instruction. Retrieved from the hospital's Web site at http://www.tmd.ac.jp/medhospital/2nd/index.html, accessed 28 January 2011.
  • 17
    Japan Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. Act 20th—designated healthcare checkup.
  • 18
    Japan Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Statistics Bureau, Director-General for Policy Planning (Statistical Standards) & Statistical Research and Training Institute. Statistics Today No.32 (S. Okamoto, Trans.). Retrieved at http://www.stat.go.jp/info/today/032.htm, accessed 25 March 2011.
  • 19
    Paris M, Salsberg E, Berenson L. An analysis of nonconfirmation rates. Experiences of a surgical second opinion program. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1979; 242: 24242427.
  • 20
    Gertman PM, Stackpole DA, Levenson DK, Manuel BM, Brennan RJ, Janko GM. Second opinions for elective surgery. The mandatory Medicaid program in Massachusetts. New England Journal of Medicine, 1980; 302: 11691174.
  • 21
    McCarthy EG, Finkel ML. Second consultant opinion for elective orthopedic surgery. American Journal of Public Health, 1981; 71: 12331236.
  • 22
    Graboys TB, Headley A, Lown B, Lampert S, Blatt CM. Results of a second-opinion program for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987; 258: 16111614.
  • 23
    Rosenberg SN, Gorman SA, Snitzer S, Herbst EV, Lynne D. Patients' reactions and physician-patient communication in a mandatory surgical second-opinion program. Medical Care, 1989; 27: 466477.
  • 24
    Moumjid N, Gafni A, Bremond A, Carrere M-O. Seeking a second opinion: do patients need a second opinion when practice guidelines exist? Health Policy, 2007; 80: 4350.
  • 25
    Tanaka M, Nakayama T, Iishi H, Awata O. Qualitative research on second opinion for cancer patient support groups and medical institutions affiliated with Japan cancer center conference (S. Okamoto, Trans). The 48th Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, p. 1126, October 2010, Kyoto, Japan.
  • 26
    Mendel R, Traut-Mattausch E, Frey D, Buhner M, Berthele A, Kissling W, Hamann J. Do physicians' recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options? Health Expectations, 2011; 15: 2331.
  • 27
    Wagner TH, Wagner LS. Who gets second opinion? Once a technique for controlling inappropriate care, second medical opinions have become a controversial practice under managed care. Health Affairs, 1999; 18: 137145.
  • 28
    Goldman RE, Sullivan A, Back AL, Alexander SC, Matsuyama RK, Lee SJ. Patients' reflections on communication in the second-opinion hematology-oncology consultation. Patient Education and Counseling, 2009; 76: 4450.
  • 29
    Mellink WAM, Henzen-Logmans SC, Bongaerts AHH, Ooijen BV, Rodenburg CJ, Wiggers T. Discrepancy between second and first opinion in surgical oncological patients. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2006; 32: 108112.
  • 30
    Mazur DJ, Hickam DH, Mazur MD, Mazur MD. The role of doctor's opinion in shared decision making: what does shred decision making really mean when considering invasive medical procedures? Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 97102.
  • 31
    Gudykunst WB. Interpersonal and intergroup communication in Japan and the United States. In: Gudykunst WB (ed.) Communication in Japan and the United States. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993: 149214.
  • 32
    Roter D, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 2002; 46: 243251.
  • 33
    Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, Grol R. The option scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve in decision making tasks. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 3442.