Health Expectations

Cover image for Vol. 9 Issue 3

September 2006

Volume 9, Issue 3

Pages 205–303, i–ii

  1. Editorial

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
  2. Citizen's Jury

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
    1. What choices should we be able to make about designer babies? A Citizens’ Jury of young people in South Wales (pages 207–217)

      Rachel Iredale, Marcus Longley, Christian Thomas and Anita Shaw

      Article first published online: 8 AUG 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00387.x

  3. Shared decision-making

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
    1. Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions (pages 218–231)

      Maria L. Jibaja-Weiss, Robert J. Volk, Lois C. Friedman, Thomas S. Granchi, Nancy E. Neff, Stephen J. Spann, Emily K. Robinson, Noriaki Aoki and J. Robert Beck

      Article first published online: 8 AUG 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00386.x

    2. Decision aids for familial breast cancer: exploring women's views using focus groups (pages 232–244)

      Frances Rapport, Rachel Iredale, Wendy Jones, Stephanie Sivell, Adrian Edwards, Jonathon Gray and Glyn Elwyn

      Article first published online: 8 AUG 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00392.x

  4. Viewpoint

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
  5. Commentary

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
  6. Shared decision-making

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
  7. Information for Choice

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
    1. Development of an information source for patients and the public about general practice services: an action research study (pages 265–274)

      Martin Marshall, Jenny Noble, Helen Davies, Heather Waterman, Kieran Walshe, Rod Sheaff and Glyn Elwyn

      Article first published online: 20 JUL 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00394.x

  8. Patients’ preferences

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
    1. You have free access to this content
      What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual ‘map’ of patient preferences (pages 275–284)

      Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Peter Bower, Nichola Mead, Ruth McDonald, Diane Whalley and Martin Roland

      Article first published online: 20 JUL 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00395.x

  9. Shared decision-making

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
    1. Who uses decision aids? Subgroup analyses from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of two prostate cancer screening decision support interventions (pages 285–295)

      Melissa R. Partin, David Nelson, Ann Barry Flood, Greta Friedemann-Sánchez and Timothy J. Wilt

      Article first published online: 8 AUG 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00400.x

  10. Resources review

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
  11. Book reviews

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
    1. Disability: Definitions, Value and Identity (pages 302–303)

      Nick Watson

      Article first published online: 8 AUG 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00409.x

  12. In this issue

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Citizen's Jury
    4. Shared decision-making
    5. Viewpoint
    6. Commentary
    7. Shared decision-making
    8. Information for Choice
    9. Patients’ preferences
    10. Shared decision-making
    11. Resources review
    12. Book reviews
    13. In this issue
    1. In this issue (pages i–ii)

      Article first published online: 8 AUG 2006 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00410.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION