Get access




    1. Northwestern University
    Search for more papers by this author
    • I am grateful to the editors, Rebecca Johnson, Roger Leech, an anonymous reviewer, and to participants in the Space to Place seminar for comments and criticisms on this article. Helena Demetriou kindly gave permission for her reconstruction of the bridge to be reproduced. Any errors and misconceptions remain my responsibility.


The aim of this article is to review and reconsider what scholars, including historians, archaeologists, and those in other disciplines, are trying to get at when they attempt a “social interpretation” of English late medieval domestic buildings. I focus on the definition and interpretation of “meaning,” and I examine critically a series of concepts routinely deployed in social interpretations in the past, including my own work, such as type, zeitgeist, and intention. I argue that some of these concepts and interpretive moves are problematic and rather than aiding in our understanding, raise further questions in their turn about how buildings were lived in and understood by their medieval inhabitants. I argue for a shift in language and jargon away from “planning” and “meaning” to that of “lived experience”. I explore such a possible shift with reference to different understandings of and debates over the late medieval castle of Bodiam in southeastern England. Such a shift from meaning to lived experience raises fresh challenges for the development and empirical evaluation of interdisciplinary research on medieval buildings, but it also raises fresh possibilities and insights.

Get access to the full text of this article