The effect of group size on vigilance in Ruddy Turnstones Arenaria interpres varies with foraging habitat

Authors

  • Richard A. Fuller,

    Corresponding author
    1. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship and CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Qld, Australia
    • School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stuart Bearhop,

    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Neil B. Metcalfe,

    1. Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Theunis Piersma

    1. Department of Marine Ecology, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands
    2. Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

Corresponding author.

Email: r.a.fuller@dunelm.org.uk

Abstract

Foraging birds can manage time spent vigilant for predators by forming groups of various sizes. However, group size alone will not always reliably determine the optimal level of vigilance. For example, variation in predation risk or food quality between patches may also be influential. In a field setting, we assessed how simultaneous variation in predation risk and intake rate affects the relationship between vigilance and group size in foraging Ruddy Turnstones Arenaria interpres. We compared vigilance, measured as the number of ‘head-ups’ per unit time, in habitat types that differed greatly in prey energy content and proximity to cover from which predators could launch surprise attacks. Habitats closer to predator cover provided foragers with much higher potential net energy intake rates than habitats further from cover. Foragers formed larger and denser flocks on habitats closer to cover. Individual vigilance of foragers in all habitats declined with increasing flock size and increased with flock density. However, vigilance by foragers on habitats closer to cover was always higher for a given flock size than vigilance by foragers on habitats further from cover, and habitat remained an important predictor of vigilance in models including a range of potential confounding variables. Our results suggest that foraging Ruddy Turnstones can simultaneously assess information on group size and the general likelihood of predator attack when determining their vigilance contribution.

Ancillary