Get access

Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Authors

  • Naichuan Su,

    1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Hang Wang,

    Corresponding author
    1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    • Correspondence to:

      Hang Wang,

      State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Department of Prosthodontics,

      West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University,

      14 Block 3 of People's Road South, Chengdu 610041, China

      Emails: wanghang@scu.edu.cn; wang_hang@hotmail.com

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Shu Zhang,

    1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Shuang Liao,

    1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Shuying Yang,

    1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Yi Huang

    1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    2. Department of Orthodontics, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine compared with lidocaine in local anaesthesia in dental treatment. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched electronically. Relevant journals and references of studies included were hand-searched for randomised controlled trials comparing bupivacaine with lidocaine in terms of efficacy and safety. Sixteen studies were included, of which nine had low, six had moderate and one had high risk of bias. In comparison with 2% lidocaine plus 1:100,000 adrenaline, 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 adrenaline showed a higher success rate in inflamed pulp (= 0.03) but a lower success rate in vital pulp (< 0.00001), a lower percentage of patients using postoperative analgesics (P < 0.00001), a longer onset times of pulpal anaesthesia and a longer duration of pulpal anaesthesia (P < 0.00001). In comparison with 2% lidocaine plus 1:80,000 adrenaline, 0.75% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 adrenaline had same level of success rate (P = 0.29), and was better in postoperative pain control (P = 0.001) while 0.75% levobupivacaine had same level of postoperative pain control (P = 0.16); 0.5% levobupivacaine had higher success rate (P = 0.04) and was better in postoperative pain control (P = 0.001) than 2% lidocaine. There was no statistically significance in adverse events between two groups. Given the efficacy and safety, the bupivacaine group is better than the lidocaine group in dental operations that take a relatively long time, especially in endodontic treatments or where there is a need for postoperative pain management.

Ancillary