The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) instrument: its reproducibility in clinical studies

Authors

  • Ana Luiza de Souza,

    1. Department of Global Oral Health, College of Dental Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
    2. Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ewald M. Bronkhorst,

    1. Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Nico H. J. Creugers,

    1. Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Soraya C. Leal,

    1. Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jo E. Frencken

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Global Oral Health, College of Dental Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
    • Correspondence to:

      Jo E. Frencken,

      Department of Global Oral Health,

      College of Dental Sciences,

      Radboud University Medical Center,

      PO Box 9101, NL–6500 HB, Nijmegen,

      the Netherlands.

      Email: Jo.Frencken@radboudumc.nl

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

A new caries assessment instrument, the Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST), was developed. It covers carious lesion progression from no lesion, sealants and restorations to lesions in enamel and dentine, advanced stages in pulpal and tooth-surrounding tissues, and tooth loss owing to dental caries, in nine codes. The objective of this study was to determine the reproducibility of the CAST instrument in primary and permanent dentitions, using three age groups. Two epidemiological surveys were conducted in Brazil, covering three age groups: 2–6-year-old and 6–9-year-old children and 19–30-year-old adults. Four trained and calibrated examiners performed the examinations. Reproducibility was calculated for intra- and inter-examiner at surface and tooth levels and expressed as unweighted kappa-coefficient value (κ) and percentage of agreement (Po) for CAST codes (0–7) and for the categories healthy (0–2) versus diseased (3–7), and non-cavitated (0–3) versus cavitated (4–7) teeth. Using CAST codes (0–7) for the 2–6-year-old age group in primary dentitions, inter-examiner consistency was κ 0.74 and Po was 98.3%. In the 6–9-year-old age group in primary dentitions, inter-examiner consistency ranged from κ 0.68 to κ 0.86 and Po was ≥93.7%. In the 19–30-year-old age group inter-examiner consistency was κ 0.87 and Po was 94.1%. The reproducibility of the CAST instrument for use in the primary dentition of 2–6-year olds and of 6–9-year olds was ‘substantial’ to ‘almost perfect’. The reproducibility for its use in the permanent dentition of 19–30-year olds was ‘almost perfect’. The CAST instrument can reliably be applied in epidemiological studies covering these ages.

Ancillary