The value of routine screening for peripheral arterial disease in stable outpatients with a history of coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease

Authors


  • Disclosures ADB has received research grants, consulting fees/honoraria and participated in speakers' bureaus for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi. AR reports no conflicts of interest. DPT is an employee of Sanofi. MG is an employee of Sanofi. JFC has received research grants and honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Sanofi. VH has participated in speakers' bureaus and created educational programmes for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck/Schering-Plough, Sanofi and Servier.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01076738.

Correspondence to:

Alan Bell,

2830 Keele Street, 2nd floor,

Toronto, ON M3M3E5, Canada

Tel.: +1 416 633 6812

Fax: +1 416 633 6187

Email: alan.bell@utoronto.ca

Summary

Background

Frequently unrecognised, PAD is associated with reduced quality of life and an increased mortality rate because of a greater propensity for fatal ischaemic events. PAD commonly coexists with coronary and cerebrovascular disease and is associated with poorer outcomes in such patients. The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) and the ankle–brachial index (ABI) are screening methods to identify the presence of PAD. This study used these methods to estimate the rate of previously undiagnosed PAD and to validate the ECQ against ABI in a Canadian outpatient population with manifest cerebrovascular or coronary disease.

Methods

At a regular office visit, patients completed the ECQ and were categorised as ECQ(+) or ECQ(−). All ECQ(+) and a randomly selected 25% of ECQ(−) patients were referred for ABI measurement. An ABI < 0.9 was considered positive. The prevalence of PAD in the patient population and the sensitivity and specificity of the ECQ score against the ABI were assessed.

Results

Of 2235 patients enrolled, 815 were selected for an ABI [ECQ(−), n = 478; ECQ(+), n = 337]. Extrapolated PAD prevalence in the total population was 12.3% (highest arterial pressure [HAP] method) and 20.8% (lowest arterial pressure [LAP] method), with a significantly higher prevalence found in diabetic patients than non-diabetic patients (p < 0.0001). Because ECQ is only a measure of symptomatic disease, it had poor sensitivity (35.3% and 25.8%), but high specificity (88.2% and 88.3%) using the HAP and LAP methods of ABI measurement, respectively.

Conclusions

Undiagnosed PAD is common in stable outpatients with a prior history of manifest cardiovascular disease, particularly in those with diabetes. The ECQ does not possess the diagnostic value of the ABI in detecting PAD in this high-risk population, but may be useful to raise suspicion of PAD to be confirmed by ABI assessment.

Ancillary