The role of exclusive breastfeeding and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on preschool children's weight gain
Article first published online: 11 JUN 2014
© 2014 The Authors. Pediatric Obesity © 2014 World Obesity
Volume 10, Issue 2, pages 91–97, April 2015
How to Cite
Silveira, J. A. C., Colugnati, F. A. B., Poblacion, A. P. and Taddei, J. A. A. C. (2015), The role of exclusive breastfeeding and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on preschool children's weight gain. Pediatric Obesity, 10: 91–97. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.236
- Issue published online: 16 MAR 2015
- Article first published online: 11 JUN 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 APR 2014
- Manuscript Revised: 7 MAR 2014
- Manuscript Received: 24 SEP 2013
- Ministry of Health
- Brazilian Centre for Analysis and Planning (CEBRAP)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP). Grant Number: 2011/17736-4
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
- exclusive breastfeeding;
- preschool children;
- sugar-sweetened beverages;
- weight gain
Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and breastfeeding practices have been recognized as important factors linked to children's weight status. However, no other studies have simultaneously investigated the role of each factor on children's conditional weight gain (CWG).
To evaluate the role of exclusive breastfeeding (EB) and the SSBs consumption on CWG from birth to the survey date among Brazilian preschool children (24–59 months old).
A nationally represented cross-sectional survey with complex probability sampling (n = 2421) was conducted. The outcome variable – CWG – represents how much an individual has deviated from its expected weight gain, given his or her prior weight. The multivariate linear regression to analyse the effects of EB and the consumption of SSBs on CWG were adjusted for economic status and maternal variables.
There was a significantly protective effect of EB duration during the first year of life on CWG from birth to the survey date (−0.02 [−0.03; 0.00 95% confidence interval]); however, the SSBs intake promoted an effect on the weight gain that was 2.5-fold higher (0.05 [0.02; 0.08 95% confidence interval]) than the EB.
As hypothesized, the exposure variables acted in opposite directions, but the harmful effect of SSBs intake had greater magnitude than the beneficial effect of EB on children's CWG.